Posts Tagged 'Robert Spencer'

Video: Robert Spencer vs. David Wood

Spencer modtager dødstrusler på grund af sin bog, skriver Arutz Sheva:

Several more threats from the same Twitter account were also sent, calling for killing David Wood, a blogger and Teaching Fellow in Philosophy, as well as blogger Pamela Geller who writes on the “Atlas Shrugs” website. The threat to Geller stated, “she needs to be hung or slaughtered because of her hatred.”

Fredens religion, hvad ellers? Video med de dødstruede mennesker:

Robert Spencer vs. David Wood: Did Muhammad Exist?

Muslims and non-Muslims assume that Muhammad existed. Robert Spencer’s new book challenges this assumption, charging that the Muhammad of Islam is shrouded in myths and legends. Can David Wood defend Muhammad’s existence against Robert’s arguments? Find out as Robert and David debate the topic, “Did Muhammad Exist?”

Undervejs henvises til denne debat:

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, PJ Media, OneNewsNow, Atlas Shrugs, IslamoCriticism,

Video: Robert Spencer, Michal Coren om Mona Eltahawy

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf – ham med ground zero moskeen, Cordoba Initiative – synes, at “profeten” var en revolutionær feminist. Det tyder ikke på at Spencer og Coren ser sådan på den debat, Mona el-Tahawy har rejst. Sun News TV om “Making Muslims look bad“:

Robert Spencer & Michael Coren on Mona Eltahawy – May 26, 2012

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins to discuss why we can’t speak the truth about Islam.

Og mere video – hele det show, vi så glimt af i Corens Arena:

Mona Eltahawy and Leila Ahmed discuss FP “Why DoThey Hate US” piece

Mona Eltahawy and Leila Ahmed discuss FP “Why Do They Hate US” piece on Melissa Harris Perry Show April 28th 2012

Eltahawy’s artikel er denne – Politiken har lavet en dansk oversættelse, som kan læses HER:

Why Do They Hate Us?

The real war on women is in the Middle East.

By Mona Eltahawy | May/June 2012

In “Distant View of a Minaret,” the late and much-neglected Egyptian writer Alifa Rifaat begins her short story with a woman so unmoved by sex with her husband that as he focuses solely on his pleasure, she notices a spider web she must sweep off the ceiling and has time to ruminate on her husband’s repeated refusal to prolong intercourse until she too climaxes, “as though purposely to deprive her.” Just as her husband denies her an orgasm, the call to prayer interrupts his, and the man leaves. After washing up, she loses herself in prayer — so much more satisfying that she can’t wait until the next prayer — and looks out onto the street from her balcony. She interrupts her reverie to make coffee dutifully for her husband to drink after his nap. Taking it to their bedroom to pour it in front of him as he prefers, she notices he is dead. She instructs their son to go and get a doctor. “She returned to the living room and poured out the coffee for herself. She was surprised at how calm she was,” Rifaat writes.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy. Og imam-fjolset Rauf og Leila Ahmed fra videoen ovenfor har også et bidrag:

[...]

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: 

As Islam has spread throughout the world, it has combined religion with native cultural practices. Many centuries later, separating the religion from the underlying culture has become difficult. That’s why Islam as practiced in Egypt differs from, say, Islam as practiced in Malaysia.

Mona Eltahawy describes cultural practices in Egypt and the Middle East that predate Islam yet have been embraced by many people now as part of Islam. The practice of genital mutilation of women, for example, is found only in Africa. If it were part of Islam, it would be practiced by Muslims all over the world.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy.

Kvinnehathateren

Mona Eltahawy venter på den andre revolusjonen i Midtøsten, den som skal frigjøre kvinnene.

En engelsk versjon av dette intervjuet er også tilgjengelig.

Nils August Andresen – 18. mai, 2012

Mona Eltahawy, få artikler i Foreign Policy har skapt så mye opphetet debatt som din artikkel om kvinnehat i Midtøsten – ”Why do they hate us?” – i siste utgave av bladet. For en utenforstående er det slående hvor smertefullt selvkritikk og offentlig skittentøyvask later til å være i mange kontekster. Det er ikke unikt for den arabiske verden; vi ser kanskje noe av det samme i den ilske tyrkiske reaksjonen på enhver diskusjon om folkemordet på armenerne, eller i den forsinkede og halvhjertede russiske unnskyldningen for Katyn-massakren. Hvorfor tror du essayet har skapt så sterke reaksjoner?

Mere HER hos norske Minerva. Den voldsepisode, Eltahawy blev udsat for, er omtalt her på bloggen:

Opdatering – Spencer:

Muslim Journalist Challenges Sharia, Gets Accused of ‘Hate’

by Robert Spencer – May 31, 2012

Mona Eltahawy receives the typical treatment given to defenders of Muslim women.

Mona Eltahawy’s piece in the May/June issue of Foreign Policy criticized a series of practices that are justified in Islamic law, including child marriage, wife-beating, and female genital mutilation. Counter-jihadist activists and writers have been calling attention to these human rights abuses for years, but Eltahawy’s piece was singular in that she is a Muslim journalist.

Mere HER hos PJ Media.

Andre kilder: Kristeligt Dagblad, PJ Media,

Video: Robert Spencer hos Wednesday Morning Club

Fra 16. maj 2012:

Robert Spencer – “Did Muhammad Exist?”

Robert Spencer speaks at the Wednesday Morning Club about his new book, “Did Muhammad Exist?” May 16, 2012

Q&A:

Desuden link til artikel på dansk – Daniel Pipes:

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch,

Video: Robert Spencer & Pamela Geller hos Stakelbeck on Terror

Fra 14. maj 2012:

Stakelbeck on Terror: Islamization in America (with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller)

CBN News Terrorism Analyst Erick Stakelbeck sits down with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, two leading voices in the fight against Islamization of the West.

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs,

Audio & video: Robert Spencer hos Middle East Forum

Spencer lancerer sin nye bog. Vi hører også Daniel Pipes:

Did Muhammad Exist?

Tommaso Virgili

A briefing by Robert Spencer April 24, 2012

Robert Spencer, director of Jihad Watch, has released a new book titled, Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry into Islam’s Obscure Origins. On April 24th, Mr. Spencer spoke on his book at a joint meeting of the Middle East Forum and Gatestone Institute in New York City.

Did the Prophet Muhammad really exist, or was he a sacred myth fashioned by the Koran decades after his purported death? Robert Spencer has addressed this thorny question with a dual intent:

Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 56 minutter. Og artiklen fortsætter her hos Middle East Forum.

Ovenstående findes også som video på YouTube, men lyden er elendig. Link her.

Udateret, men åbenbart fra begyndelsen af april 2012:

“Did Mohammed Exist?” Scholar, Robert Spencer’s inquiry into Islam’s obscure origins

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch,

Video: Robert Spencer i New Hampshire

New Hampshire 4 Israel og The Jewish Federation of New Hampshire arrangerede – fra 9. maj 2012:

Robert Spencer “Is resistance to jihad a right wing issue?” Manchester NH 5/9/12

Robert Spencer of jihad watch.com speaks to the guests of NH4Israel.com.

Video: Robert Spencer vs. Nadir Ahmed

Fra maj 2012 – Spencer skrev på Jihad Watch i går:

Last Thursday I was in Chicago and agreed to debate an Islamic apologist named Nadir Ahmed, who had been longing for that moment for years. But as you watch him getting shredded in the video below, you will at once understand why Ramadan, Esposito, Aslan and the rest decided that in response to my invitation to debate, [...] “silence is sometimes an answer.”

Og videoen, hvori man blandt andet diskuterer, hvad der er tilladt indenfor islamisk slaveri og anden lavpraktisk dhimmihåndtering. Må slaveejeren voldtage sine kvindelige slaver? Må man dræbe vantro, blot fordi de er vantro? Meget vigtige spørgsmål, selvsagt, eftersom de vedrører europæernes fremtid:

“Does Islam Teach Violence?” Robert Spencer vs Nadir Ahmed

Sappho, altid Sappho

Heldigvis:

Hvem opfandt Muhammed?

01. maj 2012 – klumme af Robert Spencer

Har muslimernes profet overhovedet levet, spørger Robert Spencer, der er aktuel med bogen, Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry into Islam’s Obscure Origins.

Mere HER i Sappho. Originalen kan læses på engelsk her i The American Thinker.

Logo Sappho Banner

Racismeanmeldelser som politisk instrument

05. maj 2012 – artikel af Sapphos medarbejder

Dette kommenterede foto på Facebook fik et medlem af  Enhedslisten til at anmelde en DF-politiker til politiet.

Se det famøse foto HER i Sappho.

De kristnes svaghed

05. maj 2012 – artikel af Lars Hedegaard

Der blev talt højt og tydeligt om kristendom og islam, da de to teologer Massoud Fouroozandeh og Marianne Søndergaard lørdag den 28. april præsenterede deres netop udkomne bog, Global Jihad: Islams sjette søjle, ved en reception i Odd Fellow-logen i Odense.

Mere HER i Sappho.

Kristne asylansøgeres mareridt

07. maj 2012 – klumme af Helle Frimann Hansen

Kristne konvertitter her i landet chikaneres og overfaldes, fortæller sognepræst Helle Frimann Hansen, der har oplevelserne tæt på livet.

Mere HER i Sappho.

Og et arrangement den 15. maj 2012 kl. 19:30 på Vartov, Grundtvigstuen, Farvergade 27, 1463 København K:

Den amerikanske forfatter Norman Berdichevsky besøger København

Hans netop udkomne bog, “An Introduction to Danish Culture”, bevidner ikke bare hans dybe indsigt i dansk kultur og historie, men først og fremmest hans kærlighed til og beundring for Danmarks bidrag til de værdier, der er grundlaget for den vestlige civilisation.

Læs mere HER i Sappho. Desuden link til:

Video: Robert Spencer, David Wood, Anjem Choudary & Omar Bakri

En lidt nørdet debat fra ABN den 30. april 2012:

Did Muhammad Exist? Robert Spencer & David Wood vs. Anjem Choudary & Omar Bakri

Did Muhammad exist? Robert Spencer’s new book claims that he didn’t. Can Muslims defend the existence of their prophet? In this debate, Spencer teams up with David Wood against Anjem Choudary and Sheikh Omar Bakri to see whether Muslims can offer historical evidence for one of their most fundamental beliefs.

Man kan læse et lille uddrag af Spencers bog i Crisis Magazine:

Spencer har genbrugt en stor del af uddraget i en artikel, som kan læses her hos Atlas Shrugs. Og flere artikler af Spencer:

Inventing Muhammad?

By Robert Spencer – April 23, 2012

Why would it matter if Muhammad never existed?  Certainly the accepted story of Islam’s origins is taken for granted as historically accurate; while many don’t accept Muhammad’s claim to have been a prophet, few doubt that there was a man named Muhammad who in the early seventh century began to claim that he was receiving messages from Allah through the angel Gabriel.  Many who hear about my new book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins ask why it would matter whether or not Muhammad existed — after all, a billion Muslims believe he did, and they are not going to stop doing so because of some historical investigations.  Yet the numerous indications that the standard account of Muhammad’s life is more legend than fact actually have considerable implications for the contemporary political scene.

These are just a few of the weaknesses in the traditional account of Muhammad’s life and the early days of Islam:

  • No record of Muhammad’s reported death in 632 appears until more than a century after that date.
  • The early accounts written by the people the Arabs conquered never mention Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an.  They call the conquerors “Ishmaelites,” “Saracens,” “Muhajirun,” and “Hagarians,” but never “Muslims.”
  • The Arab conquerors, in their coins and inscriptions, don’t mention Islam or the Qur’an for the first six decades of their conquests.  Mentions of “Muhammad” are non-specific and on at least two occasions are accompanied by a cross.  The word can be used not only as a proper name, but also as an honorific.
  • The Qur’an, even by the canonical Muslim account, was not distributed in its present form until the 650s.  Casting into serious doubt that standard account is the fact that neither the Arabians nor the Christians and Jews in the region mention its existence until the early eighth century.
  • We don’t begin to hear about Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, and about Islam itself until the 690s, during the reign of the caliph Abd al-Malik.  Coins and inscriptions reflecting Islamic beliefs begin to appear at this time also.
  • In the middle of the eighth century, the Abbasid dynasty supplanted the Umayyad line of Abd al-Malik.  In the Abbasid period, biographical material about Muhammad began to proliferate.  The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam finally appeared during this era-at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.

Mere HER i The American Thinker.

Muhammad: The Man Who Wasn’t There

By Robert Spencer – April 23, 2012

When I mention the title of my new book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins, many are startled, as they had no idea that there was any question that such a larger-than-life character might be legendary rather than historical. But in reality, no one who interacted with those who conquered the Middle East in the middle of the seventh century ever seems to have gotten the impression that a prophet named Muhammad, whose followers burst from Arabia bearing a new holy book and a new creed, was behind the conquests.

This may seem to be an odd claim. After all, there are the well-known accounts of the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem. Those depict the caliph Umar meeting Sophronius and treating him respectfully, even magnanimously declining to pray in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre so that his followers will not be able to seize the church and convert it into a mosque. Umar and Sophronius conclude a pact that forbids Christians from building new churches, carrying arms, or riding on horses, and that requires them to pay a poll tax, jizya, to the Muslims; but Christians are generally allowed to practice their religion and live in relative peace. This is the foundation of the Islamic legal superstructure of dhimmitude, which denies equality of rights to non-Muslims in the Islamic state and is oppressive in numerous ways by modern standards, but which in the seventh century was comparatively tolerant.

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs.

An Interview with Robert Spencer

Author of 12 books, including the recently released Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins.

April 26, 2012 – by Barry Rubin

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of twelve books, including two New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery). His latest book is Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins (ISI). He is interviewed by Barry Rubin, PJ Media’s Middle East editor.

Rubin: What is the basic aim of the Jihad Watch site and of your books?

Spencer: The aim of all my work is to alert the public in the United States and around the world about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, with particular attention to the aspect of the threat that has been most obfuscated and obscured: its motives, goals, and root causes, as explained by the jihadis themselves. At Jihad Watch I post on a daily basis news stories showing jihad activity, both violent and stealthy, in the U.S. and worldwide. In my books I explore aspects of the issue in detail, most notably the chief motivating factors named by jihadis themselves: the Qur’an and the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.

Mere HER hos PJ Media. Jamie Glazov har endnu et interview med Spencer her i FrontPageMagazine. Boganmeldelser:

Robert Spencer Asks: Did Muhammad Exist?

by Bruce Thornton on Apr 23rd, 2012

One of the jihadists’ most potent psychological weapons is the double standard Muslims have imposed on the West. Temples and churches are destroyed and vandalized, Christians murdered and driven from the lands of Christianity’s birth, anti-Semitic lunacy propagated by high-ranking Muslim clerics, and Christian territory like northern Cyprus ethnically cleansed and occupied by Muslims. Yet the West ignores these depredations all the while it agonizes over trivial “insults” to Islam and Mohammed, and decries the thought-crime of “Islamophobia” whenever even factual statements are made about Islamic history and theology. This groveling behavior confirms the traditional Islamic chauvinism that sees Muslims as the “best of nations” destined by Allah to rule the world through violent jihad.

Even in the rarefied world of academic scholarship, this fear of offense has protected Islam from the sort of critical scrutiny every other world religion has undergone for centuries. Some modern scholars who do exercise their intellectual freedom and investigate these issues, like Christoph Luxenberg or Ibn Warraq, must work incognito to avoid the wrath of the adherents of the “Religion of Peace.” Now Robert Spencer, the fearless director of Jihad Watch and author of several books telling the truths about Islam obscured by a frightened academy and media, in his new book Did Muhammad Exist? challenges this conspiracy of fear and silence by surveying the scholarship and historical evidence for the life and deeds of Islam’s founder.

Mere HER  i FrontPageMagazine. Kan også læses her hos Free Republic.

Book Review: Did Muhammad Exist?, by Robert Spencer

April 23, 2012 – by Zombie

Scholars have for centuries been pursuing clues to “the historical Jesus” — evidence that the religious figure now known as Jesus Christ actually once existed as a real person. There have been hundreds, if not thousands, of popular books, documentaries, television programs, magazine articles, research papers, films and more on the search for the “real” Jesus. While this investigation into the ultimate origins of Christianity may have once long ago been controversial, it is by now quite commonplace and accepted as a standard part of religious studies, even when the researchers conclude (as they often do) that the evidence for the historicity of Jesus is skimpy at best.

But no similar investigations have ever been conducted on the historicity of Muhammad (a.k.a. Mohammed, depending on the Arabic transliteration). Why not?

Most people assume that no one bothers to investigate whether or not Muhammad was a real person for the same reason that no one bothers to investigate the reality of other religious founders such as Joseph Smith or Martin Luther or Anton LaVey — because the evidence for their existence is overwhelming, well-documented and unquestioned. Regardless of whether or not Muhammad’s teachings were moral or useful, everyone, even the most hardened infidels, of course accepts that he must have existed. Right?

Mere HER hos PJ Media.

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs, WND, Secular News Daily, Urban Infidel,

Video: Pamela Geller, Darwin Jiles, Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish, David Wood, Robert Muise, James Lafferty, Michael Coren, Magdi Khalil, Simon Deng

Fra 30. april 2012:

Michael Coren in Dearborn: Pamela Geller

Last night in Dearborn, Michigan, while the Islamic supremacists raged and fulminated, we held our Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference on Honor Killing. We told the whole truth about the justifications for honor killing in Islamic law, and other related instances of aspects of Islamic law advancing in the U.S. We stood determined to defend the principles of the equality of dignity of all people, and their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

It was a superb evening, thanks in large part to your support. The Islamic supremacist/Leftist smear and hate machine was out in force, holding a rally of their own earlier in the day and then attempting to storm our event and get in despite the fact that they had not registered. We had advertised for weeks that no one would be admitted without registering first. With their usual mendacity they have tried to spin this as our not allowing Muslims into the conference, but if no Muslims really got in, that was solely because no Muslims registered — if indeed there were indeed no Muslims inside. In any case, while these disturbances were roiling outside the door, our crack security detail, made possible by your kind and generous donations in response to our appeal Saturday, ensured that only those who registered got in, and that thuggish Leftist and Islamic supremacist brownshirts were unable to harm the speakers or attendees.

- Robert Spencer

Og selve konferencen:

Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference

Pamela Geller, Darwin Jiles, Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish, David Wood, Robert Muise, James Lafferty, Michael Coren, Magdi Khalil, Simon Deng

Og artikel:

Opposing honor killing is ‘Islamophobia’?

Pamela Geller tells of dueling conferences on either side of Shariah

by Pamela Geller – May 2, 2012

We held our AFDI/SIOA Jessica Mokdad Human Rights conference last Sunday in Dearborn, the first honor-killing conference of its kind. Hundreds converged upon the Hyatt to join Robert Spencer and me and a full roster of luminaries to educate, elucidate and shine a light on the ugly and brutal atrocities under the Shariah. As expected, the goons, thugs and Muslim supremacists were also out in force. It seems that Islamic supremacists support murder for “honor,” for these subversive groups energetically opposed our conference dedicated to exposing the plight of women under Islamic law on the first anniversary of the honor murder of a Muslim girl in Michigan, Jessica Mokdad.

When we first called the conference, which we did to increase awareness of honor killings and gendercide under the Shariah, the only attention the media paid to it at all was to give a platform to the Mokdad family, which was whining that Jessica’s name was being used. Such grief – so touching the way so many Muslims go into “protect Islam” mode and not “protect our girls.”

Mere HER hos WND.

Andre kilder: YouTube, Jihad Watch, Aramaic Broadcasting Network,

Video: Robert Spencer & Michael Coren om den fiktive “profet” Muhammed

Fra 26. april 202:

Robert Spencer: Did Muhammad Exist?

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren to discuss his latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?

Desuden dette interview:

An Interview with Robert Spencer

by Barry Rubin – April 26, 2012

Spencer: What is the basic aim of the Jihad Watch site and of your books?

Spencer: The aim of all my work is to alert the public in the United States and around the world about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, with particular attention to the aspect of the threat that has been most obfuscated and obscured: its motives, goals, and root causes, as explained by the jihadis themselves. At Jihad Watch I post on a daily basis news stories showing jihad activity, both violent and stealthy, in the U.S. and worldwide. In my books I explore aspects of the issue in detail, most notably the chief motivating factors named by jihadis themselves: the Qur’an and the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.

Rubin: How have your books fit together to portray the broad picture of the issues you are engaging with?

Spencer: In eleven books now I’ve covered the nature of the jihadist challenge to the Free World from a variety of angles. The principal books explore the life of Muhammad, showing why jihadis see him as a model and guide (The Truth About Muhammad); the texts of the Qur’an that incite Muslims to violence and hatred (The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran); the comparative capacity of Christianity and Islam to incite believers to violence (Religion of Peace?); the non-violent initiatives to assert elements of Islamic law in the West (Stealth Jihad); the jihad doctrine and how it is being put into practice in the modern world (Onward Muslim Soldiers). I’ve also written an introduction to the elements of Islam that make it problematic in the West, and a survey of the most celebrated episode of the “clash of civilizations” (The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)), as well as my new book, an examination of the historical value of the writings I explored in The Truth About Muhammmad: Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins.

The person who reads all these books would have, I believe, a comprehensive understanding of the motives and goals of jihadists and Islamic supremacists, as well as of the aspects of Islam that give rise to violence, terror, and supremacism, and the uniqueness of those aspects to Islam itself as compared to other religions.

Mere HER hos PJ Media.

Opdatering – Edward Cline har en boganmeldelse hos Family Security Matters:

Video: Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, Nonie Darwish, Simon Deng

Hyl og hvin. Skrig og skrål. Ballade og protester. Demonstrationer og sabotage. Venstrefløjen kan ikke lide ytringsfrihed. Konferencen fandt nu sted alligevel og der er video fra den:

Robert Spencer and “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 1 – Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch.

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. The speakers were introduced by Temple University student, Alvaro Watson. Robert Spencer was the first speaker; listened to by most, although there was the to-be-expect disruption by a few (this happens in a couple of moments during Spencer’s opening remarks) and handled by the speaker (security seemed to just stand by and watch). He was followed by Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller and “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 2 – Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. In spite of a couple of hecklers, Ms Geller confidently waited them out and then spoke of her organization, dedicated to the individual human rights and to women’s rights. The next speaker was Nonie Darwish.

Nonie Darwish and “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 3 – Nonie Darwish

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. Ms Darwish spoke of her upbringing as a Muslim In Egypt, of leaving Islam and the Islamic Apartheid against Former Muslim, Christians and Jews. The next speaker: Simon Deng.

Simon Deng and “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 4 – Simon Deng

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. Simon Deng was enslaved at the age of 9 by Muslims in the Sudan; a horrible practice that continues throughout the Muslim world today. This was a powerful presentation….

Q and A ( Part 1) on “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 1 of the Q and A. One heckler remained in the crowd ( ignored by security) and then many of the ‘questions’ were instead statements of propaganda. All handled superbly by the speakers. Audience mic was set too low so I tweaked the audio as best I could when questions were asked. In Part one: Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish and Pamela Geller.

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. the speakers were Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Nonie Darwish, Former Muslims United and Simon Deng, a Sudanese Refugee

Q and A ( Part 2) on “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 2- Q and A continues with a concerned young man asking Robert Spencer about what he has read in the Quran. He doesn’t like the violence in the Quran. The loud mouth heckler shouts out a few times, but the Q and A continues in spite of him. Part 2 is intense and quite interesting . Reminder, the audience mic was set too low so I tweaked the audio as best I could when questions were asked.

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. The speakers were Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Nonie Darwish, Former Muslims United and Simon Deng , a Sudanese Refugee

Q and A (Part 3) on “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

Part 3 ( end of the Q and A) The students get more argumentative. Their minds are closed but the speakers, Spencer, Geller, Darwish and Deng are politely confident as they continue to address The Islamic Apartheid ….a truth these students refused to listen to.

Reminder, the audience mic was set too low so I tweaked the audio as best I could when questions were asked.

David Horowitz Foundation and The Students For Intellectual Freedom hosted this conference at Temple University on the evening of April 23, 2012. The speakers were Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Nonie Darwish, Former Muslims United and Simon Deng , a Sudanese Refugee.

Artikel om balladen:

Islamic Apartheid Conference Sparks Protest

by Ali Watkins on Apr 25th, 2012

Dean of Students Stephanie Ives foreshadowed the inevitable contention in Kiva Auditorium at the Islamic Apartheid Conference, sponsored by Temple University Students for Intellectual Freedom, yesterday, April 23.

“I ask you all to keep the principles of free speech and civil discourse in mind tonight,” Ives urged the packed auditorium prior to the conference’s start.

Featuring controversial panelists Robert Spencer, director of the blog “Jihad Watch,” Pamela Geller, former-Muslim Nonie Darwish and Sudanese refugee Simon Deng, the conference addressed issues such as honor killing and Jihad in the Arab-world, and specifically focused on Islam’s contribution to said issues.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. The Temple News her.

Save the Misunderstanders of Islam!

By Robert Spencer – April 16, 2012

Why don’t the leading Muslim groups in the United States care about Muslims?

It’s a serious question. Its urgency became clear yet again last week, when three more warriors of Allah got their just desserts: Tarek Mehanna, a young Muslim in Massachusetts, got seventeen and a half years in prison on Thursday for conspiring with jihadis to murder American soldiers in Iraq. The same day, Agron Hasbajrami, a Muslim who lives in Brooklyn, pled guilty to trying to aid terrorists and attempting to go to Pakistan to join them. And Jubair Ahmad, a twenty-four-year-old Muslim from Woodbridge, Virginia, was sentenced Friday to twelve years in prison for aiding Lashkar-e-Taiba, a jihad terrorist group in Pakistan. But these cases point up yet again an even larger problem: the denial and deception of Muslim spokesmen and organizations in the U.S.

Nowadays when fresh arrests, trials, guilty pleas and convictions of jihad terror plotters come down the pike, Muslim leaders and Islamic advocacy groups like the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) don’t even bother to issue condemnations. They don’t have to. After over ten years of constant propaganda from the mainstream media, government and law enforcement about how Islam is religion of peace and how anyone who commits violence in its name is misunderstanding and misusing its basic tenets, most Americans take for granted, if they hear about the likes of Tarek Mehanna, Jubair Ahmad and Agron Hasbajrami at all, that they are not true Muslims.

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs.

Opdatering:

Fighting the fascists at Temple University

Pamela Geller tells of battle to present anti-Shariah message over protesters

Last week, Islamic Apartheid Week was announced at Temple University in Philadelphia. A singular brave student organization at Temple wanted to counter the blood libel and propaganda of Israeli Apartheid Week, which is so common and so awful on college campuses, with the reality of the Shariah and the oppression, subjugation and persecution of women and non-Muslims living under Islam.

No sooner was it announced than the Islamic smear machine went into high gear. Numerous articles appeared in the Philadelphia City Paper, Naked City and elsewhere, smearing and defaming the speakers (Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish, Simon Deng and me), but most egregiously me. Hamas-CAIR sent out a string of email alerts in support of the Occupy Muslim student groups’ protests.

Mere HER i WND.

Andre kilder: FrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine, The Land of Israel,

Video: David Horowitz – fantastisk konference

Fantastisk konference, utroligt mange pundits samlet på ét sted – vælg eventuelt noget ud. Først noget islamkritik – fra David Horowitz Freedom Center’s Restoration Weekend 17. – 20. november 2011:

Arab Spring, Muslim Winter – Mark Tapson, Michael Totten, Daniel Pipes, Andrew C. McCarthy, Douglas Murray,

Arab Spring, Muslim Winter – Q & A

Decline of the West: Rise of the Rest – Michael Wienir, Bruce Bawer, Paul Vallely, Michael Ledeen, Bruce Thornton

De fine foredrag fortsætter her på Veritas Universalis ► ► ► HER

Video: Robert Spencer, Bruce Thornton, David Goldman, Daniel Pipes, Jamie Glazov, Ward Connerly, Victor Davis Hanson

The Retreat – fra David Horowitz Freedom Center 30. marts – 1. april 2012:

Losing the Middle East

Ward Connerly

Victor Davis Hanson

På Blip TV kan man se flere videoer fra arrangementet: Congressman Mike Rogers, Senator Ron Johnson, The 2012 Elections: Jay Cost, Martha Zoller, Pat Caddell and Brian Calle, The 2012 Elections Q&A, Hollywood and the Culture Wars: Dwight Schultz, Michael Walsh, Jeremy Boreing, Bill Whittle, Mark Tapson, Hollywood and the Culture Wars Part 2, Hugh Hewitt – Part 1, Hugh Hewitt – Part 2, Daniel Henninger – Part 1, Daniel Henninger – Part 2, Ed Royce, Ben Horowitz: The Economy and Technology, Jim Gilliam: The Economy and Technology,

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, FrontPageMagazine, David Horowitz Freedom Center,

Video: Michael Coren & Robert Spencer om Vestens løgne

Narrativet må ikke forstyrres:

Michael Coren with Robert Spencer: islamic terrorism

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren via Skype to discuss the bombing of a Nigerian church during Easter celebrations by members of the Religion of Peace.

Og en artikel:

Framing Geller and Spencer For Murder

By Robert Spencer – April 09, 2012

Shaima Alawadi, murdered in her home, and for awhile, it was the fault of Pamela Geller and me. A hijab-wearing mother, in death Alawadi quickly became much more prominent than she had ever been in life. Paired with Trayvon Martin, she was made into the symbol of allegedly rampant anti-Muslim bigotry in the U.S., and the impetus for “Hoodie and Hijab” marches that protested the supposed dire predicament of racial and religious minorities in America today. There was only problem with all this handwringing and finger-pointing: Alawadi’s murder was not a hate crime at all.

This revelation Friday morning, along with the release of information that made it look much more likely that Alawadi was a victim of honor killing than of murderous “Islamophobia,” stopped a few of the more circumspect among the Islamic supremacists: the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) tweeted a claim that it had always had doubts about the “hate crime” claim. Islamic supremacist writer Reza Aslan, however, who had initially blamed Pamela Geller and me for the murder, reacted with scornful indifference to the news disproving his claims, and continued to promote Hoodie and Hijab rallies.

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs.

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch,

Video: The Glazov Gang – Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish, Bruce Thornton, Evan Sayet, Jim Tooey

Fin diskussion – fra 1. april 2012:

The Glazov Gang – The Islamic War on American Free Speech

The Glazov Gang – Part 1 of 3/The Islamic War on American Free Speech

Prof. Bruce Thornton (Author, “The Wages of Appeasement”)
Nonie Darwish (Author, “The Devil We Don’t Know”)
Robert Spencer (Author, “Did Muhammad Exist?”)

Og fra 18. marts 2012:

The Glazov Gang – Afghanistan Killings, Western Media and Double Standards

The Glazov Gang – Part 1 of 3/Afghanistan Killings, Western Media and Double Standards

Jim Tooey (Producer/Actor/Playwright)
Evan Sayet (America’s #1 Conservative Comedian)
Nonie Darwish (Author, “The Devil We Don’t Know”)

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, FrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine,

Video: Michael Coren & Robert Spencer om islamofascisme

Fra 31. marts 2012:

Michael Coren & Robert Spencer: The fight against islamofascism

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren to discuss the clear and present danger of islam in the West.

Fed opsang her – fra 31. marts 2012:

Michael Coren: Shut up!

The March 31, 2012 of Michael Coren’s occasional “Shut Up!” feature.

Og tilbage til Spencer:

The Empire of Fear

By Robert Spencer – March 26, 2012

As I wrote last week, Muslim and non-Muslim analysts often tell us that Muslims hate the West for its decadence, its immorality, its lasciviousness, which they contrast unfavorably with the supposed morality and uprightness of the Islamic world. Often this boils down to a Muslim critique of Western “freedom,” especially as Bush and Obama pursued military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan ostensibly to bring Western-style freedom to those countries.

In line with that, the Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali, once complained that “Australian law guarantees freedoms up to a crazy level.” Yet genuine freedom is an indispensable prerequisite for any cultivation of real virtue. Even the post-Christian West makes it more possible to be virtuous than the apparently much more straitlaced Islamic world. With its stonings, amputations, death penalties for an array of offenses including apostasy, Islam has created not a framework in which people can become genuinely good, but an empire of fear. People don’t dare step out of line, not out of an authentic understanding that the path of moral and ethical uprightness is preferable to the alternative, much less out of love for God or a real desire to please him, but because they are afraid of what would happen to them if they did depart from Islam’s vision of morality.

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs.

The Toulouse Massacre: More Jihad Denial

Robert Spencer – March 25, 2012

Every time a Muslim commits murder in the name of Islam, the denial begins again: Western leaders and the mainstream media tie themselves into knots trying to explain what happened without making any reference to its guiding motivation.

Last week was no different: Muhammad Merah was a self-styled “Islamic warrior” who killed a rabbi and several children at a Jewish day school in Toulouse, France, in an attack that the international media widely reported initially as having been perpetrated by a neo-Nazi. When it became clear that Merah was actually a jihadist, the predictable denial began: French President Nicolas Sarkozy said that the attack had nothing to do with Islam, and the call echoed worldwide not to allow the murders to harm French “pluralism.”

Mere HER i The American Thinker.

Accommodating Islam On the Checkout Line

By Robert Spencer – April 02, 2012

Wegman’s, a supermarket in Rochester, New York, has set up a special checkout line for a hijab-wearing Muslim cashier, directing customers to go to other lines if they have pork or alcohol.

Islamic law forbids Muslims not just to eat, but to handle or sell pork or alcohol, and Wegman’s customers seemed happy to go along. One said, “I feel like if they’re going to hire her and she’s got to have the job, why shouldn’t we respect her. Just go to another cashier.” Another added: “I would respect her beliefs and go to the next line if I had alcohol.”

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs. Et flot interview:

Robert Spencer interviews Nicolai Sennels: “Muslims are taught to be aggressive, insecure, irresponsible and intolerant”

By Robert Spencer on April 2, 2012

Nicolai Sennels regularly contributes to Jihad Watch, with articles on psychology and translations of Scandinavian and German news. To help you get to know Sennels better, we decided to do an interview.

Nicolai Sennels (born 1976) is a Danish psychologist. His first appearances in the Danish media concerned his unorthodox therapy methods that he developed as the only psychologist at Sønderbro, the youth prison (see here, here, here, here and here). He taught the young prisoners about mindfulness meditation and developed a special program on anger management. Sennels also developed a psychotherapeutic method that focused on teaching criminals with a low understanding of emotions and empathy how to take responsibility for their own behavior. In 2008, the prisoners of Sønderbro voted the facility as the best prison in Denmark. The leader of Social Services in the Copenhagen municipality concluded that this was due to the work of Nicolai Sennels (Amagerbladet, November 3, 2008).

Mere HER hos Jihad Watch. Vdare her.

CAIR Blocks Discussion of Islam – But Only Temporarily

by IPT News  •  Apr 5, 2012

Efforts by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to squash a lecture by writer Robert Spencer have been thwarted.

Spencer originally planned to speak April 18 at the New York law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel about his forthcoming book, Did Muhammad Exist? The talk was sponsored by the Middle East Forum (MEF), headed by Daniel Pipes.

CAIR issued an action alert March 29 calling on the firm to rescind its invitation, claiming the event would promote “Spencer’s claim that Islam’s Prophet Muhammad may never have existed.” Spencer’s book is based on his review of the 130-year scholarly tradition that raises fundamental questions

Mere HER hos The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Andre kilder: FrontPageMagazine, OneNewsNow, MarketWatchMarketWatch, MarketWatch, Middle East Forum, Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Jihad WatchJihad Watch, Jihad Watch,

Video, audio & artikler: Robert Spencer og Pamela Geller om verdens islamiske nedtur

Mange islamkritikere har ikke flere illusioner tilbage, – der er ikke nogen her i hvert fald. Geller er fantastisk i denne video. Fra 22. marts 2012:

Pamela Geller

3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour

Robert Spencer

3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour

Fra KHOW Radios The Caplis & Silverman Show. Fra 22. marts 2012:

If you missed Caplis and Silverman three o’clock hour yesterday, you missed a lot! But worry not, it is the featured podcast at www.khow.com. BTW, when Spencer and Geller were asked about military action against Iran’s nuclear program, they both said yes. When asked when it should occur, both said, “YESTERDAY!”

Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 38½ minutter.

Fra 22. marts 2012 på KHOW Radio – The Peter Boyles Show:

Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch is in studio with Peter for the Full hour. Peter and Robert discuss the history of Islam and the vast differences between Islamic and western culture and philosophy. Robert Spencer and Peter discuss Jihad in Europe, Jefferson and the Jihadist, Bush and Obama and western governments misunderstanding of Islamic law and culture, slavery and Islam and Arab Muslims slaughtering black Africans and more.

Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 33½ minut.

Time to Get Out of Afghanistan

March 19, 2012 – By Robert Spencer

The Afghan mission is imploding, and the Obama administration is covering for Islamic jihadists.  Last week, Marine officials revealed that a Marine killed on February 1 in what the Pentagon called “combat operations” at the time was actually murdered by a jihadist in the Afghan army.  The cover-up of this latest jihad attack from a supposed ally is emblematic of a failed mission.  It is long past time to end the  mission in Afghanistan.

Hamid Karzai has said that he wants Afghan forces to take control of the nation’s security in 2013, not 2014 as American officials are planning.  Karzai is a scoundrel, but he is right about this, albeit for the wrong reasons.  This mission is foredoomed.  There is no clearly defined goal, and in any case, any goal worth reaching is impossible to achieve.  There is no bringing democracy or humane values to a sharia state, and in any case, we already gave the Karzai regime a sharia constitution, so we aren’t really even trying to do anything effective for women or non-Muslims or the freedom of speech or the freedom of conscience.  We’re fighting against an enemy that the vice president of the United States says is not an enemy, and that our client president of Afghanistan threatens to join.  How long is this madness going to continue?

Mere HER i The American Thinker.

Egypt Designates Israel Its Top Enemy — Obama Restores Military Aid

by Robert Spencer on Mar 21st, 2012

Egypt’s parliament, which is dominated by two pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist groups, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists, voted unanimously last Monday to expel Israel’s ambassador to Egypt, and signaled that the Camp David Accords would soon be a thing of the past: Egypt, the parliamentarians declared, would “never” be Israel’s ally. In fact, Israel was Egypt’s “number one enemy.” And how did Barack Obama respond to this egregious trampling upon the agreement that has kept an uneasy peace between Israel and Egypt for thirty years? By announcing a resumption of military aid to Egypt.

From the beginning of the “Arab Spring,” I said repeatedly that it was not a democracy movement, as the Western press was claiming, but an Islamic supremacist takeover that would result in the creation of Sharia states that would be far more hostile to the U.S. and Israel than the Arab nationalist regimes they were supplanting. This assessment was greeted with the usual scorn: the Islamic supremacist media machine charged “Islamophobia,” on Fox Juan Williams said I was “fearmongering,” and the usual suspects made the usual ad hominem attacks. Yet everything that has happened since then has shown that the “Arab Spring” is indeed an Islamic supremacist winter, ushering in repressive Sharia regimes with the enthusiastic blessing of Barack Obama.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Sex, Jihad and Islam

By Robert Spencer – March 19, 2012

They hate us because we’re pigs. No, not the apes and pigs into which Allah transforms the Sabbath-breaking Jews in the Qur’an (2:62-66; 5:59-60; 7:166), but pigs as in…dogs. Wolves. Immoral, lecherous, lustful, fornicating creeps. Western immorality is a frequent feature of the Islamic critique of the contemporary West, as well as a target for the morality police of Sharia states. In the summer of 2009 Iranian authorities even published a list of hairstyles that were acceptably moral and Islamic, as opposed to “decadent” Western imports, among which were the ponytail and the mullet.

That same Western decadence is also a frequent preoccupation of Islamic jihadists. In December 2010, a Muslim named Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly set off explosives on a street in Stockholm that was crowded with Christmas shoppers, killing himself and injuring two others. His wife, who was herself later arrested for helping plan the attack, explained that Abdulwahab “disliked the decadent side of society here.”

Even some non-Muslim writers echo this critique. Dinesh D’Souza argued in his 2007 farrago The Enemy At Home that Islamic jihadists were largely motivated by rage at the West’s “social and moral corruption,” and asserted that “the Muslims who hate us the most are the ones who have encountered Western decadence, either in the West or in their own countries.”

Mere HER hos Atlas Shrugs.

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs,

Video: Michael Coren & Robert Spencer om voldtægt og tvangsægteskab i islam

Gad lide at vide, hvorfor pressen pludselig interesserer sig for voldtægt og tvangsægteskab i islam? Er det ikke negativ omtale af muslimer? Og så er der jo risiko for, at Vestens fredsommelige borgere bliver fascister? Eller noget:

Girl forced to marry muslim rapist, kills self

Michael Coren and Robert Spencer discuss the case of Amina Filali, a young girl who killed herself after a judge forced her to marry her rapist.

Artikel om sagen:

Moroccans demand change to Islamic penal code after girl, 16, kills herself because judge forced her to marry her RAPIST

  • Online petition after case of teen who swallowed rat poison in protest
  • Women’s rights activist describes horror as ‘recurring phenomenon’
  • ‘Law protects public morality but not the individual’

By Lee Moran | 14 March 2012

Angry Moroccans are demanding a change to the country’s strict Islamic penal code after a 16-year-old girl killed herself after being forced to marry her rapist. An online petition, a Facebook page and countless tweets expressed horror over the suicide of Amina Filali, who swallowed rat poison on Saturday in protest at her marriage to the man who raped her a year earlier.

Mere HER i The Daily Mail.

The Necessity of Anti-Sharia Laws

By Robert Spencer – March 13, 2012

Louisiana, Arizona ,and Tennessee have already passed legislation restricting the use of foreign law in state courtrooms, and twenty-one other states are considering similar laws.  These statutes are designed to halt the use of Islamic law, sharia, by American judges — a measure that many see as necessary, since sharia has already been involved in cases in twenty-three states.  Many see this as an alarming encroachment upon First Amendment protection of religion; however, anti-sharia laws do not actually infringe upon religious freedom at all, and they become more urgently needed by the day.

In the March issue of First Things, law professor Robert K. Vischer equates anti-sharia laws with recent intrusions upon the religious freedom of Christians, such as laws that now require “pro-life pharmacists to dispense the morning-after pill” and “Christian adoption agencies to place children with same-sex couples, and religious entities to pay for their employees’ contraceptives.”  He asserts that “[t]he recent spate of ‘anti-Sharia’ initiatives is just the most politically popular example of such threats” to religious freedom.

Mere HER i The American Thinker. Og en debat – Spencer og Ibrahim diskuterer sprogbrug:

Why We Need Words Like ‘Islamist’

Without such words, meaningful talk becomes next to impossible.

by Raymond Ibrahim – February 13, 2012

Is the problem Islam or Islamism?  Muslims or Islamists?

These and related questions regularly foster debate (see the exchange between Robert Spencer and Andrew McCarthy for a recent example). The greatest obstacle on the road to consensus is what such words imply; namely, that Islamism and Islamists are “bad,” and Islam and Muslims are good (or simply neutral).

Some observations in this regard:

Islamism is a distinct phenomenon and, to an extent, different from historic Islam.  The staunch literalness of today’s Islamists is so artificial and anachronistic that, if only in this way, it contradicts the practices of medieval Muslims, which often came natural and better fit their historical context.

Mere HER hos PJ Media. Raymond Ibrahim har den her – The Middle East Forum her.

Why We Don’t Need Words Like ‘Islamist’

By Robert Spencer – February 15, 2012

Since I previously had an exchange with Andy McCarthy about the utility of the term “Islamist” (article here; video with transcript here); I read Raymond Ibrahim’s new piece, “Why We Need Words Like ‘Islamist,'” with great interest.

Raymond initially states the controversy this way:

“Is the problem Islam or Islamism? Muslims or Islamists?

These and related questions regularly foster debate (see the exchange between Robert Spencer and Andrew McCarthy for a recent example). The greatest obstacle on the road to consensus is what such words imply; namely, that Islamism and Islamists are “bad,” and Islam and Muslims are good (or simply neutral).”

Mere HER hos Jihad Watch. FrontPageMagazine her. Ibrahim trækker lidt i land i en post hos Jihad Watch:

Opdatering – fra 22. marts 2012:

Protestors call for reform to Morrocan rape laws

Andre kilder: Jihad Watch, Atlas Shrugs, B.T., Stonegate Institute,

Video: Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, J. Christian Adams, Ilario Pantano, Robert Muise, James Lafferty

Pamela Geller og Robert Spencer havde sørget for, at der også var islamkritik ved CPAC-konferencen – fra 10. februar 2012:

Pamela Geller Opening Remarks AFDI “Islam in America”- CPAC 2012

Pamela Geller (AFDI/SIOA & Atlas Shrugs.com)Her opening remarks before she introduced this explosive panel at CPAC 2012. They spoke of “Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department is Selling us Out.” And then introduced Ilario Pantano, the first speakers ( Many thanks to Tim and Maria Lyng of TheRemembranceProject.org for permission to post this video)

The Obama Justice Department is not just tolerating, but actively aiding the assertion of Islamic law in the U.S. and the primacy of Sharia over U.S. Law.” The purpose of this panel was to encourage the efforts of many who are already fighting to stop the Stealth Jihad and to show other Americans, perhaps new to this struggle, what we must do to preserve our Constitutional Freedoms.

AFDI presents Ilario Pantano on “Islamic Law in America” at CPAC 2012

Pamela Geller introduces Ilario Pantano, a war hero and Congressional candidate in North Carolina. (video quality improves at 2:48)

Ilario was the first of the speakers who gathered to address the Obama Justice Department, which is not just tolerating but actively aiding the assertion of Islamic law in the U.S. and the primacy of Sharia over U.S. Law.”

The purpose of this panel is to encourage the efforts of many who are already fighting to stop the Stealth Jihad and to show other Americans perhaps new to this struggle, what we must do to preserve our Constitutional Freedoms.

At 207 views replaced previous video so that we could include the footage that had been omitted due to a camera malfunction

Robert Spencer’s opening remarks at AFDI’s “Islamic Law in America” Panel at CPAC 2012

Robert Spencer, in association with Pamela Geller, is co-founder of AFDI and SIOA . They presented this explosive panel at CPAC 2012 on “Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department is Selling us Out.

Robert Muise & Robert Spencer at AFDI’s “Islamic Law in America” Panel – CPAC 2012

Robert Spencer (AFDI/SIOA) introduces Robert Muise, co-founder and Senior Counsel of the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) participated in this explosive panel at CPAC 2012. The topic was “Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department is Selling us Out.

Pamela Geller, “Islamic Law in America” Panel at CPAC 2012

Pamela Geller (AFDI/SIOA & Atlas Shrugs.com) follows speaker Robert Muise, co-founder and Senior Counsel of the American Freedom Law Center and then introduces J. Christian Adams ( former Justice Department official) . This explosive panel at CPAC 2012. spoke of the threat : “Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department is Selling us Out.

J. Christian Adams on AFDI’s “Islamic Law in America” at CPAC 2012

J. Christian Adams, Former Justice Department Official and author of “Injustice:Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department” participated in this explosive panel at CPAC 2012. The topic was “Islamic Law in America: How the Obama Justice Department is Selling us Out. Introduced by Pamela Geller of AtlasShrugs.com and co-founder of AFDI and SIOA .

James Lafferty at AFDI’s ” Islamic Law in America” CPAC 2012

James Lafferty of VAST ( Virginia anti-Sharia Task Force) is introduced by Robert Spencer of AFDI/SIOA and JihadWatch.org.

This video has been edited to remove remarks that have been willfully misconstrued by Leftist news sites. James Lafferty said in a statement: “My CPAC speech has drawn great attention from the leftist blogs and CAIR. In reality, I do not condone, advocate or support any violent or vigilante action against mosques or any other building or any individual, and I am a firm believer in the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and in the rest of the Constitution.”

Members of the panel spoke on the Obama Justice Department, which is not just tolerating but actively aiding the assertion of Islamic law in the U.S. and the primacy of Sharia over U.S. Law. There was also time for a few questions from the audience

The purpose of was panel is to encourage the efforts of many who are already fighting to stop the Stealth Jihad and to show other Americans perhaps new to this struggle, what we must do to preserve our Constitutional Freedoms.

AFDI Geller and Spencer, the conclusion of panel on “Islamic Law in America” at CPAC 2012

Final statements from Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer after the panel spoke on the Obama Justice Department, which is not just tolerating but actively aiding the assertion of Islamic law in the U.S. and the primacy of Sharia over U.S. Law. There was also time for a few questions from the audience

Andre kilder: Atlas Shrugs,

Reservelink YouTube.


Translations

Translate Danish to English Translate Danish to Arabic Translate Danish to Bulgarian Translate Danish to Catalan Google-Translate-Chinese (Simplified) BETA  Translate Danish to Traditional Chinese Translate Danish to Croatian Translate Danish to Czech Translate Danish to Dutch Translate Danish to Finnish Translate Danish to French Translate Danish to German Translate Danish to Greek Translate Danish to Hebrew Translate Danish to Hindi Translate Danish to Indonesian  Translate Danish to Italian Google-Translate-Danish to Japanese BETA Translate Danish to Korean BETA Translate Danish to Latvian Translate Danish to Lithuanian Translate Danish to Norwegian Translate Danish to Polish Translate Danish to Portuguese Translate Danish to Romanian Translate Danish to Russian Translate Danish to Serbian Translate Danish to Slovak Translate Danish to Slovene Translate Danish to Spanish Translate Danish to Swedish Translate Danish to Tagalog Translate Danish to Ukrainian Translate Danish to Vietnamese Warning: The English translation is hopeless

Ingen link herunder

Blogportaler

Polit-blogs

Politblogs

DanskeWeblogs.dk | Katalog over danske blogs

Kategorier

Fundet på Snaphanen:

Arkiv – dato

juli 2014
m ti o to f l s
« jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Arkiv – måned

Uriasposten om Danmarks Radio:

Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.

7. oktober 2007

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.