Skriften på væggen: Vi kan ikke blive i Europa. Det er ikke her, vi skal bo, når vi bliver gamle. Det er ikke her, børnebørn og oldebørn skal vokse op. Det er på tide at forberede udvandring. For mange vil det tage måske 10 år at få styr på gæld, banklån og lignende.
I løbet af nogle år kommer der sandsynligvis et ægte stop for al indvandring. Men der kommer også noget andet: et totalt stop for al europæisk udvandring. Man vil forhindre europæerne i at rejse. Kapitalflugt. Tomme huse. Truende statsbankerot. Det er mit gæt. Det udvandringsstop kommer, når det er for sent at redde stumperne.
Skynd jer ud, venner. Tag gerne eventuelle virksomheder og ansatte med jer. Protestantismens etik kan rekonstrueres overalt, hvor en nation vil det. Disciplinering til lønarbejde. Det, der har givet Danmark en stor middelklasse. Det, der skabte USA. Tag det med jer og rejs fra multikulturen.
Europarådet forlanger diversitet og det kan rådet ikke få uden fremmedimport. Europarådet har oprettet et redskab for at sikre, at rådet får sin vilje: Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedsdomstol. Hele 47 lande er medlemmer. England, Danmark og flere. Et andet af rådets værktøjer er Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention. Europas destruktion ligger fast og har gjort det i årtier. Det er en knaldrød dagsorden, der er tale om. Socialisme ad bagdøren, som forlængst er implementeret i de danske love. I dag har vi human lefts. Ikke human rights som i gamle dage. Og domstolsstyret er ikke demokratisk. Uanset hvilken regering, vi vælger, er der intet, der bliver anderledes. Der er kun spin og tom snak tilbage. Tilsat diversitet, vold, plyndringer med videre. Rejs, venner, rejs.
Er det måske ok, at du bliver slået til kørestolsbruger, hvis du får skattelettelser? Eller at din datter eller dit barnebarn bliver voldtaget, men eftersom der findes “økonomiske incitamenter”, så går det nok?
Nej. Og det kan ikke lade sig gøre at ændre noget ad politisk vej. Forlad Europa, mens I endnu kan:
Byen brænder
10. august 2011
Billederne fra London og andre britiske storbyer, der er stukket i brand af hærgende unge og kriminelle bander bringer mindelser om science fiction-film, hvor hele byer er omdannet til ruiner, og hvor forbrydere terroriserer de overlevende. En britisk avis bragte i går endda en tegning, hvor apokalypsens ryttere betragter den brændende storby.
Mere HER i Berlingske Tidende.
England fik aldrig rigtig noget ud af 70′erne og 80′erne. Hele 40 års efterslæb. Den middelklasse, de burde have opbygget, udeblev. I stedet blev proletariseringen udvidet ved hjælp af indvandring. Formålet var at udrydde det, Max Weber kaldte kapitalismens ånd og protestantismens etik. Det lykkedes. Berlingske skriver i lederen, at ingen har et svar, der virker. Det passer ikke helt. Vi har svaret, men det er for sent.
Venstrefløjen giver andre skylden for de ødelæggelser, venstrefløjen selv har skabt. De snakker om arbejderklassen (arbejderklassen?) og forstår ikke, at problemet er dem selv. Arbejderne og gadeproletariatet er jo den gruppe, der burde starte de virksomheder og skabe de job, der mangler. Arbejderne er dem, der skulle have været middelklassen. Forældrene er dem, der burde have unge ansat på egne virksomheder og i egne butikker. Men i visse indvandrerkredse er der næsten ingen. Visse indvandrere ansætter ikke sorte, kvinder og vantro. Nu har England ikke længere protestantismens etik som sammenhængskraft. Ingen social kapital.
Indvandrere har ofte anden religiøs baggrund. Rastafari, animisme, voodoo. Og den etik, der følger med de mest uintegrerbare, er som i Afrika og i Mellemøsten. Mange af dem vil have sharialov. Loyalitet overfor stamme, klan og kaste – ikke England. Tag ikke vantro til venner, siger koranen, som også rummer et kapitel om plyndring af krigens hus.
England kan ikke længere løfte sig selv. De kan ikke finansiere velfærd til sigselv og hinanden. Ingen fælles kultur. Ingen fælles værdier. Alle forsøg på at ændre de fremmedes kultur betragtes som racisme. De fremmede må ikke blive som europæerne – det strider imod målsætningerne om diversitet. Venstrefløjen har sejret ad helvede til:
Ignoreret af politikerne, mobbet af medierne
Af Hans Redder, Rasmus Bo Sørensen – 9. august 2011
I årevis er den britiske arbejderklasse blevet hånet og latterliggjort. I satireshows på tv udstilles de som dovne, dumme og uduelige, og mange briter opfatter deres socialstatus som selvforskyldt. Nu svarer den underkendte underklasse igen med vrede og vold i Londons gader. Det var kun et spørgsmål om tid, lyder det
Mere HER i Information.
A Nation of What
Daniel Greenfield – August 11, 2011
The London riots are yet another episode in the slow disintegration of Europe. London is no longer an English city, it’s just another pin on a map. Much of London is a bunch of Third World cultures living in a geographical area that they have no cultural or emotional connection to. The culture around them is as shamelessly materialistic, vulgar and violent as anything in the dark ages—with the occasional tip of the hat to politically correct values involving the environment or tolerating gay people. And the same goes for the rest of Europe’s capitals. Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, Brussels and Oslo are all obvious examples.
The real showdown in London was not between opportunistic rioters and the impotent police, but between African looters and Asian storekeepers fighting a purely materialistic battle. And if the UK’s immigration trends do not change, in a generation or two, the battle will have a much more open character. A struggle for ownership of the city.
Mere HER i Canada Free Press. Sultan Knish her.
Britain’s Road to Riots
Under Labour, a life on welfare appeared the best life to live.
By Douglas Murray – August 11, 2011
In April 1993, black teenager Stephen Lawrence was stabbed to death at a bus stop in south London. The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) bungled the investigation, and by 1997, Britain’s new Labour government had announced a judicial inquiry into the matter. The report was published in 1999 and found that “institutional racism affects the MPS, and police services elsewhere.” It also made recommendations aimed at “the elimination of racist prejudice and disadvantage and the demonstration of fairness in all aspects of policing.”
Since then the country’s police services have been suffering a public nervous breakdown, quaking at every public-relations setback and buckling under mounting restrictions on their ability to their jobs at all. Currently, the Metropolitan Police is actually leaderless, its commissioner having resigned last month in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal.
Mere HER hos Perdana. Stammer egentlig fra The Wall Street Journal her, men der er en paywall, som kommer og går. Melanie Phillips skriver igen om volden:
Dogma and decency
Melanie Phillips – 11 August 2011
Tensions were said this morning to be running high in Birmingham, where three public-spirited Muslim men in Winson Green who had been guarding their area against thugs during the riots were appallingly run down and killed by a rioters’ car containing a number of black men. The police are conducting a murder investigation, and one suspect has been arrested.
Mere HER på Melanie Phillips’ blog.
The Disastrous Death of Common Sense
Former British Ambassador Charles Crawford argues that the Labour Party’s support for the unrelenting deconstruction of British values has created ignorant, violent decontextualised people, completely detached from history – and morality
Written by Charles Crawford on 10 August 2011
Over the centuries English property law has invented many ingeniously pragmatic ways in which property can be owned. One key distinction shows itself every time a couple take out a new mortgage. They are offered a choice: a ‘tenancy in common’ or a ‘joint tenancy’.
The difference is as simple as it is profound. Under a tenancy in common, the property is owned by A and B in specific shares (eg half/half, one third/two thirds); A’s share can be sold or bequeathed to someone else, so B now co-owns the property with that new person. By contrast, if A and B own under a joint tenancy there are no identifiable shares: if A dies, A’s share automatically goes to B.
Mere HER i The Commentator. Og Theodore Dalrymple, der denne gang bruger sig eget navn:
Behind England’s riots, a violent and entitled generation of British young people
By Anthony Daniels – August 10th 2011
The riots in London and elsewhere in England have confirmed what I long knew and have long preached to my disbelieving but totally unobservant countrymen: that young British people are among the most unpleasant and potentially violent young people in the world. It took determination on the part of my countrymen not to notice it.
Needless to say, any generalization on such a scale needs to be tempered by qualification. Of course it is true that not all young Britons are unattractive in appearance and conduct, only a far higher proportion of them than of the young of any other nation. It requires but an overnight stay on a Friday or Saturday in any British city to prove it. Even Russians are appalled by what they witness.
Mere HER i New York Daily News.
Learning Something from the Streets?
By Victor Davis Hanson – August 11, 2011
Thousands of pages have already been written in explication of the British rioting and (quite lesser incidence of) American flash mobbing. If one combines these analyses with direct news accounts, op-eds, Youtube confessionals, and official government pronouncements describing constantly changing strategies, I think one can draw three disinterested conclusions.
Mere HER i National Review Online.
Years of liberal dogma have spawned a generation of amoral, uneducated, welfare dependent, brutalised youngsters
By Max Hastings on 10th August 2011
A few weeks after the U.S. city of Detroit was ravaged by 1967 race riots in which 43 people died, I was shown around the wrecked areas by a black reporter named Joe Strickland.
He said: ‘Don’t you believe all that stuff people here are giving media folk about how sorry they are about what happened. When they talk to each other, they say: “It was a great fire, man!”
I am sure that is what many of the young rioters, black and white, who have burned and looted in England through the past few shocking nights think today.
Mere HER i The Daily Mail.
British youths are ‘the most unpleasant and violent in the world’: Damning verdict of writer as globe reacts to riots
By Lee Moran and Allan Hall on 10th August 2011
British youths have been branded as ‘the most unpleasant and potentially violent young people in the world’ by a renowned doctor-writer.
Anthony Daniels, a retired prison doctor and psychiatrist who has worked in some of the hardest-hit areas on the planet, said the British were now in great fear of their own arrogant, knife-wielding children.
The author said Britain’s young had a ‘sense of entitlement’ and were unwilling to change their ways for anyone else – with the only difference between the rich and the poor being that the former had the money to buy what they wanted, whereas the poor had to ‘wheedle, cajole, swindle and steal it’.
Mere HER i The Daily Mail.
The Mob Tears at the Foundations of Civilization in London and America
J. Christian Adams – August 10, 2011
Watching London burn, one cannot help but sense something has gone awry in the west. London, the cradle of our law, spins toward lawlessness.
The law, the steady framework of our civilization, seems incapable of response. Americans don’t have the luxury anymore of watching the anarchy on television, assuming distance insulates us from the Mob-prowling neighborhoods like Camberwell and Tottenham. The howling rage has even come to our own Midwest.
Hopefully time and wisdom will reveal what has fractured, but for now, we are certain of some things.
Mere HER i Family Seurity Matters.
Riot of Opportunity
The most outlandish international reactions to Britain’s violence
By Philip Walker | August 10, 2011
After five days of riots in London that have spread across the country, everyone seems to be pontificating on — or pointing the finger at — who’s to blame for the wave of violent social unrest. And some of the comments are just plain wacky: Since when does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad approve of mass protest in the streets? Here’s a look at some governments around the world — especially those past recipients of British condemnations and military campaigns — who just can’t resist the temptation to give Britain a taste of its own medicine.
Iran
The Iranian Foreign Ministry has urged the British government to stop its violent confrontation with rioters and start a dialogue. Hossein Ebrahimi, a member of the Iranian parliament, also told the Fars News Agency that Britain should permit human rights monitors to investigate the troubles in its restive cities. And on Wednesday, Aug. 10, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told reporters after a cabinet meeting in Tehran:
Mere HER i Foreign Policy.
Opdatering: Hos Hudson New York skriver man om det samme som ovenfor - Anna Mahjar-Barducci – August 17, 2011:
The Kids Aren’t Alright
What’s really behind Britain’s wave of youth violence?
By Portia Walker | August 10, 2011
London – Buildings are charred and shops barricaded closed. Helicopters circle low overhead. London’s prison cells are all full. Police are flooding the streets of the capital. For four days now, mobs have run amok in multiple areas across this city, looting, brawling, and terrorizing people.
As a mob stormed through a warm Monday night on a west London street, restaurants locked their doors and diners headed home early.
Mere HER i Foreign Policy. Og Chesler tror, at englænderne er tyske nazister. At de var på hver sin side under 2. verdenskrig, kan åbenbart være lige meget. Det hele er bare racistiske “Europeans”. Det her er fæl omgang sludder:
Multiculturalism = Racism
by Phyllis Chesler
The civilizational war that Jean Raspail once envisioned in his brilliant, dystopian novel The Camp of the Saints is now fully underway. What Raspail once only imagined has come to pass. People of color from many formerly colonized countries have created “no go” zones all across Europe; ambulances and the police enter there at their own risk.
The “youth,” the opportunistic criminal elements, the proto-jihadists (all of whom survive on the European dole), are torching cars, looting stores, battling the police.
Mere HER hos Phyllis Chesler eller her hos Arutz Sheva.
Opdatering – Jeg snupper lige dette citat:
[...]Unlike Los Angeles or Paris, the riots are not happening in ghettos where nobody goes. They are happening amid the organic gastropubs and latte bars. Alongside poverty, inner London is full of the sort of middle-class progressives who agree with Ken Livingstone that the rioters “feel no one at the top of society, in government or City Hall, cares about them or speaks for them”.
I predict a lot of those people, as they cower behind their sash windows, are revising their views tonight. The hardening of liberal opinion in London is palpable, and is taking even the likes of Boris Johnson by surprise.
Mere HER i The Telegraph.
Mere opdatering – det tonser løs med artikler om vold i England:
London and UK riots: The long retreat of order
To understand the cause of these riots, we need to accept that the police ceded control of the streets to the criminals decades ago.
By Philip Johnston – 09 Aug 2011
When rioters rampaged through the suburbs of Paris six years ago, Nicolas Sarkozy, then France’s interior minister, called them racaille. While this can mean “rabble” or “riff-raff”, it also translates as “scum”.
You cannot imagine a British politician using that term to describe the youths who have turned London into a war zone. Yet it is the word that will have been on the lips of all decent people as they watched – appalled, shocked and ashamed – while the capital and, later, other cities were trashed by elements of their criminally inclined underclass. Epithets like “rabble” or “riff-raff” are too mild for the lawless, feckless, mindless and amoral thugs who forced passers-by to strip naked while they stole their clothes; or who torched a furniture warehouse that had withstood the Blitz; or who ransacked shops across London. What else do you call them?
Mere HER i The Telegraph.
How did England’s cities become engulfed in a Lord of the Flies nightmare? Moral relativism is to blame, not gang culture
By Toby Young – August 11th, 2011
Towards the beginning of Lord of the Flies, William Golding’s masterpiece about a group of teenage boys marooned on a desert island, a scene takes place in which the most vicious of the boys, Roger, throws stones at a younger boy whose sandcastle he’s just knocked down:
Roger gathered a handful of stones and began to throw them. Yet there was a space round Henry, perhaps six yards in diameter, into which he dare not throw. Here, invisible yet strong, was the taboo of the old life. Round the squatting child was the protection of parents and school and policemen and the law. Roger’s arm was conditioned by a civilization that knew nothing of him and was in ruins.
Mere HER i The Telegraph.
Western Unrest and the Failure of Social Engineering
Frank Salvato – August 12, 2011
While the world mainstream media is focused on the unrest that has plagued Great Britain, they are delinquent in reporting on societal unrest elsewhere in the Western world. In Chile, tens of thousands of students staged violent protests, demanding changes in government-funded public education. In Philadelphia, a rash of “flash mob” incidents has forced that city’s mayor to impose curfews for teenagers in several neighborhoods. And in Milwaukee, authorities are investigating a string of mob-like actions involving large groups of predominantly black teenagers near the Wisconsin State Fair, leading one City Alderman to attributing the violence as a sign of “deteriorating African American culture in our city.”
In all of these instances – from London to Milwaukee, Santiago to Philadelphia, one common factor exists: Young people, who have been endowed with a falsely elevated sense of self-esteem, are narcissistically demanding more from a grossly over-extended government entitlement system instituted by Progressives to create a dependent populace. Why would anyone want to create such an unstable and dangerous societal atmosphere? Power.
Mere HER i Family Security Matters.
Seneste kommentarer