Posts Tagged 'Edward Luttwak'

Edward Luttwak om de svækkede shiamuslimer

“Den shiamuslimske halvmåne” bliver ikke til noget foreløbig:

Revenge of the Sunnis

What the Arab Spring is really about.

By Edward Luttwak | December 7, 2011

Logo Foreign Policy MagazineThe last decade has been marked by the rise of the Shiites in the Middle East. Through the bullet and the ballot box, Shiite parties have risen to power from Baghdad to Beirut — thereby extending Iran’s reach into the heart of the Arab world. Sunni rulers have viewed with much anxiety the new “Shiite crescent” that extends from Iran all the way to Lebanon.

But as a popular — and now military — uprising in Syria becomes more powerful, the Shiite ascendancy is coming to an end. With every day that passes, President Bashar al-Assad’s grip on power seems to weaken: The United Nations assessed on Nov. 1 that Syria had entered a state of civil war and the country’s economy is projected to contract by a disastrous 12 percent to 20 percent this year. And now, the regional Sunni powers are hoping to exploit the turmoil to launch a counteroffensive that could reverse their losses.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy.

Edward Luttwak om Ben-Gurion

Og præsident Obama:

The Narrows

Ben-Gurion repeatedly faced down crises by fearlessly rejecting retreat and useless compromise. Obama would do well to follow his model.

By Edward N. Luttwak – October 27, 2011

Logo Tablet Magazine

Now an international airport and a university, as well as any number of boulevards in Israeli cities and towns, David Ben-Gurion – the man – was born in Płońsk, the Russian-ruled part of Poland in 1886. When he read Israel’s declaration of Independence on May 14, 1948, thereby inaugurating the first government of the first Jewish state in two millennia, he was already 62. In the years since, some 150 new states have been established. Most of these were the gift of colonial powers that handed them over to their new rulers as complete packages with everything ready from internationally recognized borders to a ministry of finance and a prison service. That was true of the post-Soviet states as well, except for the democratic bits, which their rulers mostly ignore anyway.

Mere HER i The Tablet.

Fint interview med Edward Luttwak

Q&A: Edward Luttwak

The military strategist talks about Israeli security, Henry Kissinger, the Arab Spring, and the death of Osama Bin Laden

By David Samuels | September 6, 2011

Logo Tablet Magazine

Edward Luttwak is a rare bird whose peripatetic life and work are the envy of academics and spies alike. A well-built man who looks like he is in his mid-50s (he turns 70 next year), Luttwak—who was born in 1942 to a wealthy Jewish family in Arad, Romania, and educated in Italy and England—speaks with a resonant European accent that conveys equal measures of authority, curiosity, egomania, bluster, impatience, and good humor. He is a senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University, and he published his first book, Coup d’État: A Practical Handbook, at the age of 26. Over the past 40 years, he has made provocative and often deeply original contributions to multiple academic fields, including military strategy, Roman history, Byzantine history, and economics. He owns a large eco-friendly ranch in Bolivia and can recite poetry and talk politics in eight languages, a skill that he displayed during a recent four-hour conversation at his house, located on a quiet street in Chevy Chase, Md., by taking phone calls in Italian, Spanish, Korean, and Chinese, during which I wandered off to the porch, where I sat and talked with his lovely Israeli-born wife, Dalya Luttwak, a sculptor.

Mere HER i Tablet Magazine.

Edward Luttwak – interview om den norske tragedie

Edward Luttwak: Heterogeneity Is an Advantage For Democracy But Up To a Point

July 27, 2011

- What is the correlation between ethnic homogeneity and democracy?

- Edward LuttwakIt is not simple. In making the US the Founding Fathers specifically identified a great advantage from diversity. Everybody spoke English but some colonies were slave-holders and others colonies vehemently anti-slavery. Some were Catholic like in Maryland, some were puritans like Massachusetts, some were Quaker pacifists like in Pennsylvania. The Founding Fathers said that without this diversity any democracy would be crashed by one unidirectional thinking. Heterogeneity is an advantage for democracy but up to a point. Of course, none of the sixteen colonies had an ideology that was destructive of the other fifteen. So there was nothing like Nazism, Bolshevism or Islamism. Because today you are not dealing with ethnic diversity but you are dealing with ideologies that are destructive in themselves, and they are destructive whether they are held by homogeneous people of the same language or nationality or different ones. Nazism does not have to be German, Islamism is multiethnic and that is the point. Ethnic diversity in itself is favoring democracy because it is reducing the tyranny of conformity. The Founding Fathers in America said that without diversity there will be theoretical democracy which is crashed by conformity when everybody has the same outlook. 

Mere HER hos Russia Yaroslavl. Kan også læses her hos Russia Beyond the Headlines.

Og endnu et interview fra 22. august 2011 – samme kilde:

Audio: Edward Luttwak kritiserer indsats i Libyen

Fra programmet Background Briefing with Ian Masters den 24. marts 2011. Luttwak er virkelig fin her:

Audio Headset Black 50Criticism of NATO in Libya

Edward Luttwak discusses the ideas in his article, “Libya: It’s Not Our Fight.”

Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varighed 22 minutter.

Andre kilder: CSIS – Center for Strategic and International Studies,

Edward Luttwak imod intervention i Libyen

Libya: It’s not our fight

Regardless of its good intentions, the U.S. intervention in Libya will be depicted once again as aggressive, predatory and anti-Muslim.

By Edward N. Luttwak – March 21, 2011

Logo Los Angeles Times 2

Once again the United States is bombing a Muslim country to liberate its people from their own sanguinary rulers. Once again we are told that innocent civilians are being massacred and that the United States must intervene as a matter of moral duty, in its capacity as a great and good nation. But in this case — even as part of a broader, U.N.-sanctioned coalition to enforce a no-fly zone — the U.S. should not have intervened at all.

No humanitarian appeal should ever be lightly dismissed, and indeed many Americans justifiably recall with deep regret the failure of the Clinton administration to intervene against the 1994 Rwandan genocide, when a few thousand lightly armed soldiers on the ground could have saved hundreds of thousands.

Mere HER i Los Angeles Times.

Video: Edward Luttwak om USA og Mellemøsten

Fra Russia Today den 23. februar 2011:

“Democracy is not something you can buy in a shop”

“Democracy is not something you can buy in a shop” – US military strategist

US military strategist and historian Edward Luttwak has given RT his insight into the continuing unrest across the Arab world.

Edward Luttwak has published works on military strategy, history and international relations. He recently wrote in The Wall Street Journal: “If Mubarak leaves now, the result is likely to be an anarchical or Islamist Egypt, or some of both until another dictatorship emerges.”

The strategist told RT it is because democracy takes centuries to develop.
“You cannot create it, you cannot jump ahead,” he said.

Edward Luttwak added that the US government is always in a state of embarrassment when its friends “are not democratic.”

“On the one hand, Mubarak is a friend. On the other hand, he is a dictator. And the rule is that once America is your patron, you can not shoot at the crowd,” Luttwak said.

“The US has always to manage a contradiction. On the one hand, we are normal American people, we like friends and we don’t like enemies. On the other [hand], we also want democracy, so when you become a friend of the United States and you are not democratic, you are in a difficult situation.”

The strategist told RT that the uprisings in the Arab world are “popular insurrections” and nobody is pulling the strings.

“This is a crowd action, a popular insurrection. It’s not a revolution, it is not a coup,” he said. “People are living under a government, and one day they all get up, because of an incident. This is a true popular uprising – quite a special event.”

Edward Luttwak also claims that the center of real world politics is far from the Middle East.

“The Middle East lost its importance with the end of the Cold War. It generates a lot of headlines, but the real politics now is in the Pacific, and it is China and anti-China. That’s where the world politics is,” he said. “The Middle East is just pictures – the pictures of shouting people. But what’s going on there? Nothing. You talk about the countries that don’t really produce anything, they don’t invent anything, don’t develop anything. They are not important. Some of them have oil. That’s it.”

Desuden link til Edward Luttwaks artikel i Wall Street Journal HER. Det kan blive nødvendigt at gå ind via Google her.

Egypten: Så er der pundits igen

Der er mange, så man må vælge sig nogle stykker ud:

Michael Savage & Greg Lewis, Marc Tracy, Stephen Flurry, Brad Macdonald, Edward Luttwak, Brigitte Gabriel, Walid Shoebat, Caroline Glick, Andrew C. McCarthy, Phyllis Chesler, Nonie Darwish, Daniel Greenfield, Alan Dershowitz, Ezra Levant, Paul Mason. Den første artikel findes åbenbart kun som pdf:

Obama and the Shadow Socialist Group Behind Egypt’s Fall?

By Michael Savage and Greg Lewis

Barack Obama has been playing a critical role in making sure that Egypt, one of our staunchest allies in the Middle East, is positioned to become the next member of the Union of Iranian Radical Islamist Republics headed by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Every single word out of the president’s mouth, every single move he’s made has had the effect of stabbing Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in the back, of opening the door to Islamist radicals taking another step on their way to restoring an unholy caliphate in that region.

Mere (pdf) HER hos Michael Savage.

Will the Real Brotherhood Please Stand Up?

Group gets a seat at the table, but what does it really want?

By Marc Tracy | Feb 7, 2011

With Vice President Omar Suleiman holding nearly unprecedented talks with Muslim Brotherhood representatives, and with Secretary of State Clinton accepting its participation in these negotiations and even President Obama de-emphasizing its importance while at the same time coming to terms with its inclusion (and not denying its “anti-U.S.” ideology), it’s time to try to answer the question: Who is the Muslim Brotherhood, and what does it want?

Mere HER i The Tablet.

Hosni Mubarak Sealed His Fate in 1981

February 4, 2011 | Stephen Flurry

As Herbert W. Armstrong told the Egyptian president early on, only God can establish a just and lasting peace.

After a terrorist organization with links to the Muslim Brotherhood assassinated Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in October 1981, a startled world watched with wonder. How will this sudden, unexpected jolt impact world events? Will Sadat’s relatively unknown successor continue the pursuit of peace in the Middle East?

What few people realized at the time was that Hosni Mubarak had been carefully groomed to follow in the steps of his predecessor.

Mere HER i The Trumpet eller her på Stephen Flurrys blog. Endnu en artikel fra samme kilde:

America’s Self-Righteousness Is Destroying Egypt

February 3, 2011 | Brad Macdonald

Washington’s naive devotion to democracy is doing untold damage.

For many Americans, the violent scenes of anarchy unfolding on the streets of Cairo, Alexandria and other Egyptian cities are a beautiful and inspiring sight.

Mere i The Trumpet HER. Og en Dry Bones:

Dry Bones February 7, 2011

Dry Bones er tegnet af Yaakov Kirschen. Man kan finde mange sjove tegninger på The Dry Bones Blog. Næste:

On Egypt, Mubarak, And Eight More Months For The Democratic Opposition To Organize

A Quick Mubarak Exit Is Too Risky

It is not often recalled that Hamas is the Gaza branch of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.

By Edward Luttwak, 4 February 2011

The Obama administration, like much of the world, is not reacting to the situation in Egypt—a mostly rural country populated mainly by poor peasants. It is reacting to the media spectacle in the center of Cairo, in which huge but largely middle-class crowds have gathered to demand President Hosni Mubarak’s removal.

Interestingly, the few journalists who speak colloquial Egyptian Arabic report that among the poor majority of the population—those who wear the traditional robe (djellaba) and depend on bread subsidized by the state—many still support Mr. Mubarak. They know that Egypt is the world’s largest importer of wheat, and that part of it is paid for by U.S. aid. While market prices have increased by 17% since last October, the rationed bread of the poor remains very cheap.

Mere HER i The Wall Street Journal – kan også læses her i New English Review. Francis Fukuyama siger i øvrigt også noget i en meget kort artikel i Wall Street Journal. Det kan man se her. Og næste artikel:

Muslim Brotherhood Rises as Egypt and Middle East Destabilize

by Brigitte Gabriel – February 4, 2011

In the last three weeks, America has lost three major Islamic moderate governments in the Middle East.  Lebanon’s secular and Western-friendly government has now been replaced and is controlled by Hezbollah, Iran’s proxy army in that country.  Islamic radicals are already filling the power vacuum in Tunisia, and now Egypt is falling into chaos.

What we are witnessing in Egypt and across the Arab-Islamic world is a revolution, and not simply for economic reasons.  What was sparked by uprisings in Tunisia is now taking on a life of its own, with demonstrations in Jordan, Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Yemen, Lebanon, and ones planned this weekend in Syria.

 Mere HER i Human Events.

The emerging Muslim Union

By Walid Shoebat – February 04, 2011

PREPARE [Wa-a-iddou] is a single Arabic word that appears on the Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood’s logo written under the sign of the two swords, the symbol of Islamic Jihad. “Prepare” actually comes from the Quranic verse:

“Prepare against them as you are able of force and cavalry to terrorize Allah’s enemy and yours. …” (Al-Anfal:60)

Warfare and terror is their motto. It started when many Egyptians were angered at Arabia’s collaboration with the West in the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire, especially since the Caliphate fell with it. That dismantling was the primary reason the Muslim Brotherhood was created four years later in 1928; its sole purpose was the resurrection of the Caliphate. They made inroads, especially after the failure of Arab Nationalism; the Brotherhood gave birth to the slogan “Al-Islam-Huwa-Alhal” (Islam is The Solution), which became their main slogan.

Mere HER i WorldNetDaily eller her i The New Media Journal.

Israel and Arab democracy

By Caroline Glick – February 4, 2011

Whether they are democrats or autocrats, we fully expect they will continue to hate us.

Over the past week, Israel has been criticized for being insufficiently supportive of democratic change in Egypt. While Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has been careful to praise the cause of democracy while warning against the dangers of an Islamic takeover of the most populous Arab state, many Israelis have not been so diplomatic.

To understand why, it is necessary to take a little tour of the Arab world.

Mere HER i The Jerusalem Post eller her på Caroline Glicks blog.

Mubarak v. The Brotherhood

Andrew McCarthy . February 3, 2011

It is simply delirious to suggest that we can work with the Muslim Brotherhood, that the Brotherhood has renounced violence, or that a Brotherhood-led government will ultimately be better for the United States or, for that matter, for Egyptians.

We have two principal interests in the region: peace and anti-terrorism. Say what you will about Mubarak, who has committed abominable abuses and stunted the growth of civil society — albeit in the face of a non-stop terrorist threat that is more immediate and existential than anything we face in the U.S. Mubarak has also kept the peace with Israel, and he has been a real ally against terrorists (as opposed to “allies” who profess allegiance with us but do more to abet than defeat jihadism).

Mere HER hos Family Security Matters. Eller her i National Review Online. Og McCarthy igen:

Don’t Count on Egypt’s Army

February 5, 2011 – Andrew C. McCarthy

We cannot trust Egypt’s military to combat Islamists.

‘My name is Khalid Islambouli,” the assassin thundered. “I have slain Pharaoh, and I do not fear death!” This was at an annual state parade in Cairo on October 6, 1981. Islambouli, swelling with a delirious pride, had just strafed the reviewing stand with bullets, killing Egyptian president Anwar Sadat and hurtling his nation into chaos.

That was the plan. Islambouli, like several of his coconspirators, was a Muslim Brotherhood veteran who’d drunk deep the incitements of the Ikhwan’s martyred leader, Sayyid Qutb, but lost patience with the organization’s Fabian approach to revolution. He’d joined Islamic Jihad, one of several splinter groups that would later be folded into al-Qaeda by another Brotherhood alum, Ayman Zawahiri.

Mere HER hos National Review Online. Kan også læses her hos Ruthfully Yours.

Am I the Only One Troubled By Cairo Street Scenes?

by Phyllis Chesler – February 1, 2011

For days now, the mainstream and leftstream media have been telling us that the Muslim Brotherhood is not dangerous, not radically Islamist—but that even if they are Islamist that they are popular amongst the people. Western leftists view the Brothers as engaged in a Hamas-like form of soup kitchen social work/theocratic totalitarianism, but who nevertheless have earned the right to be democratically voted into power by the people.

Short-sightedly, they claim that if we are serious about standing for democracy and the vote, that we have no choice but to support what may turn out to be an even worse tyranny than that of Mubarak’s.

Such journalists also claim that the Egyptian people in the streets are not “political,” that they are impoverished, broken, barefoot warriors who have heroically risen up for jobs, food, and an end to corruption and tyranny. Indeed, the people may not be “political”—but their heroism may end up benefiting those who, unlike themselves, are already organized militarily, economically, and ideologically—like the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mere HER på NewsRealBlog. Kan også læses her hos Arutz Sheva.

Illusions and Delusions About the Turmoil in Egypt: What is Wrong with Rabbis Michael Lerner and Arthur Waskow?

by Prof. Phyllis Chesler – February 2, 2011

Why do so many Jews insist on their divine right to refuse to learn from history? How can a 1930s Stalinist ideology or even a 1960s liberal-socialist-feminist ideology exert such a death-grip over otherwise educated people?

Mere HER på NewsRealBlog eller her i Arutz Sheva.

Will Egyptians Take Responsibility For Their Own Dictatorships?

by Nonie Darwish – Feb 4th 2011

The Egyptian people have finally awakened to the reality of decades of oppression, dictatorship, backwardness and extreme poverty. For now, they are united in viewing Hosni Mubarak as the one obstacle to their freedom and democracy — but will they finally take responsibility for the true reason behind the long line of tyrannical Egyptian regimes? Will they examine their own failures and contributions to their problems? Or will they continue to blame America for supporting their dictator? Will they reject victimhood status and stop finger-pointing? Will they finally join the rest of the world in a new era of friendship based on mutual respect and not based on tribalism and the “us against the West” mentality?

The idea that America is behind the Mubarak dictatorship is ludicrous, but it has become a slogan not only in the Arab world, but also among many Americans. Chris Matthews of MSNBC has repeatedly blamed America for the Mubarak dictatorship. I have news for Mr. Matthews: only 3 men have ruled Egypt since 1952. Gamal Abdel Nasser was much more oppressive than Mubarak and he was certainly no friend to the US or to any other Western country. The fact is that Egyptians, and the Arab countries in general, have continually installed their own dictators, without America’s influence. America can only hope and encourage dictators who are not bellicose and who do not hate the US.

Mere HER i Big Peace eller her i FrontPageMagazine.

Soros and Iran, want ElBaradei to take power without winning an election

Pulling Back the Egyptian Veil

By Daniel Greenfield – February 5, 2011

The Obama administration is demanding an immediate “transition” in Egypt. By transition they mean that Muslim Brotherhood hand puppet Mohammed ElBaradei should take power immediately without the benefit of winning an election first.

Mubarak has agreed not to run for reelection. ElBaradei said that he won’t run for office, but then said that he might run “if the Egyptian people want me.” (As if the Egyptian people have anything to do with it.) But the foreign backers of the protests, Soros and Iran, want ElBaradei to take power without winning an election.

Mere HER i Canada Free Press. Kan også læses her i The Free Republic.

Lessons From Egypt: The United States Can Count On Israel, But Can Israel Count on the United States?

by Alan M. Dershowitz – February 5, 2011

It’s too early to learn all the possible lessons—and there will be many—from the current turmoil throughout the Middle East, but one important lesson is that there is only one democracy that the United States can always count on to remain a strong ally. That democracy is Israel. No one knows whether any or all of the Arab states that are currently in flux will pull an “Iran” on us – turning from friend to foe in the blink of an Ayatollah.

The optimists are hoping for more of a Lebanon than an Iran, but even Lebanon—with a better history of democracy than any other Arab country—is now essentially in the hands of Hezbollah. The United States cannot count on the new Egypt remaining an ally, even with the carrot of massive aid.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York eller her i Huffington Post.

The things Obama left unsaid

Unlike those fighting dictators in Eastern Europe, Egypt’s liberals haven’t had solid backing from West

By Ezra Levant – February 6, 2011

Can you name a single Arab country that has switched from being a dictatorship to a democracy?

The only answer is Iraq. And the explanation for that is 200,000 U.S. and British troops who kicked out Saddam Hussein’s military dictatorship in 2003, and the 50,000 U.S. soldiers still there today, protecting that democracy from Iran-backed terrorists.

Iraqis tried to liberate themselves with a series of rebellions in 1991, after the first Gulf War had weakened Saddam. But the West didn’t lift a finger to help, so Saddam crushed them.

Mere HER i The Toronto Sun. Edmunton Sun her.

Twenty reasons why it’s kicking off everywhere

Paul Mason | 5 February 2011

We’ve had revolution in Tunisia, Egypt’s Mubarak is teetering; in Yemen, Jordan and Syria suddenly protests have appeared. In Ireland young techno-savvy professionals are agitating for a “Second Republic”; in France the youth from banlieues battled police on the streets to defend the retirement rights of 60-year olds; in Greece striking and rioting have become a national pastime. And in Britain we’ve had riots and student occupations that changed the political mood.

What’s going on? What’s the wider social dynamic?

Mere hos BBC HER.

Edward Luttwak om Korea-konflikten

The Guns of December

It’s about time South Korea started shooting back.

By Edward Luttwak | December 21, 2010

Logo Foreign Policy MagazineIt is hard to recall a better example of successful deterrence than what failed to happen on Monday, Dec. 20, on the Korean peninsula. That was the planned date of a South Korean artillery drill on Yeonpyeong Island, just seven and half miles from the North Korean mainland, but 50 miles from Inchon, the nearest South Korean port. Determined to intimidate Seoul into calling off the artillery exercise — 94 minutes of live fire — Pyongyang issued a veritable cascade of threats.

First, the North Korean Foreign Ministry officially declared that because the South was so reckless, the matter would be left entirely in the hands of the military command, which had been given full freedom of action. Ratcheting it up from there, the North Korean military spokesman declared that if the South fired its guns at all, their reaction would be: fierce, devastating, drastic, and/or catastrophic, depending on the translation. But the highest note in the crescendo came from Sin Son-ho, the dapper North Korean ambassador to the United Nations, who solemnly warned that if war broke out, it would not be confined to the Korean peninsula and might easily spread worldwide.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy.

Audio: Edward Luttwak i Australien

Det kaster lidt materiale af sig, at Edward Luttwak gæster Australien for tiden. Her handler det om nutidige og fremtidige krige. Luttwak siger bla. at FN fastfryser konflikter og hindrer løsninger. Intervieweren fra ABC hedder Mark et-eller-andet. Jeg kan ikke høre efternavnet.

Edward Luttwak

Audio IconPeace is breaking out all over the world, and future wars will all be small and restricted, according to influential US advisor Edward Luttwak.

He’s in Australia talking about war and peace at the Creative Innovation Conference which has just wound up in Melbourne.

However, Edward Luttwak is no peacenik. For him war has a purpose and a place, and a natural flow, which you interrupt at your peril.

War is about winners and losers, he says, and the modern distaste for such hard-headed thinking does no-one any favours. Mr Luttwak is used to being at the centre of things — a senior associate at the centre for strategic and international studies in Washington, and he has served as an adviser to the US Department of State, the US military and NATO

Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varighed 14½ minut.

Ny artikel af strategen, Edward Luttwak

Kina, Japan, Irak, Afghanistan, Australien, USA, Somalia. Edward Luttwak skriver om verdens brændpunkter:

National strategy: the turning point

The announcement that China’s economy had overtaken Japan’s in total size meant almost nothing – Gross Domestic Product numbers are more symbolic than real. Besides, Japan has been stagnant for years. But everybody understood the real message: the United States is next, on the way to a China-centred world.

It should be a huge wake-up call for American, and Australian, national strategy.

As of now, the United States with Australia tagging along, is focused on conquering mud-brick villages in Afghanistan, or rather the allegiance of their inhabitants. Whether non-Muslims can ever do that in a largely illiterate land where people have no stronger identity, is extremely doubtful. No Afghan would travel thousands of miles to help Americans or Australians, so Taliban accusations that their real aim is to destroy Islam by emancipating women and such, are readily believed.

Australske ABC har resten HER

Edward Luttwak on Lateline ABC

Samme tv-kanal har lige haft et kort interview på godt 6 minutter med Edward Luttwak om samme emne og det er tilgængeligt på video. Der er endda en udskrift, man kan følge med i. Udskrift HER. Video HER. Åbner Windows Media Player.

Interview med Edward Luttwak

Det er længe siden vi har haft Edward Luttwak omtalt her hos Veritas Universalis. Men det bliver der rådet lidt bod på nu. Om moderne krigsførelse i et historisk perspektiv:

Scholar says West should treat radical Islam the way Byzantine generals did the Huns

By Miriam Cosic – The Australian  – September 04, 2010

We should use intelligence, not 18-year-olds, to fight terror, argues Edward Luttwak

Logo The AustralianTHE Byzantines brought three skills to their foreign policy: intelligence, diplomacy and military force. Their superiority in each kept the eastern half of the Roman Empire intact for a millennium after the famed legions of the West fell to invading barbarians.

Today, in the contemporary West, we don’t even begin to approach the sophistication in these skills of Byzantium, later known as Constantinople and now Istanbul, according to Edward Luttwak, author of The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire.

Mere HER i The Australian.

Video: Edward Luttwak om det bysantinske rige

For de meget historieinteresserede – om en vigtig periode for mange af Europas lande. Om strategiske kulturer, imperier, diplomati, efterretningstjenester, krigsstrategier, oplysningstiden, offentlig administration, skattesystemer, kristendommens etik og betydning, – alt sammen i et historisk perspektiv. Interviewet slutter med lidt perspektiveringer til USAs situation i moderne tid.

The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire – Edward N. Luttwak

December 8, 2009 in Campus UC Berkeley

Conversations host Harry Kreisler welcomes Edward N. Luttwak for a conversation on his new book, “The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire.” 

Luttwak discusses the logic of strategy; the distinctive features of Byzantine strategy with its balance of diplomacy, intelligence, and military power; the institutional and ideological foundations that account for the eight hundred year survival of Byzantium, and the implications of this record for other great powers with diminished resources confronting many adversaries.

The conversation concludes with a comparison of Rome, Byzantium, and the United States.

Knap 59 minutter:

Andre kilder: WikipediaWikipedia, Den Store Danske,

Video: Edward Luttwak om USA i krig

Det handler om amerikansk udenrigspolitik og krigsstrategier – historiske og nutidige. Irak og Afghanistan er selvfølgelig med, men der er mange andre overvejelser også. Det er Q&A tilsidst. Fra Berkeley University 5. november 2007:

Edward Luttwak – Lecture

Strategic Options for U.S. Foreign Policy – Edward Luttwak, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies

Edward Luttwak

Varighed 1 time og 10 minutter – videoen startes HER – via en lille grå popup.

Videoen foreligger desværre kun i et format, der skal ses i RealPlayer, VLC VideoLan eller tilsvarende. Klik på video-navnene for evt. download.

Andre kilder: Wikipedia,

Video: Edward Luttwak om Irak

How New Divisions in the Middle East offer the U.S. an Opportunity to Regain Influence in the RegionEdward Luttwak, an internationally recognized authority in the area of military strategy, recently contended in testimony before the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Foreign Relations that, “only with the United States’ disengagement can Iraqis find their own equilibrium.”

He underscores the futility of trying to micromanage an Iraqi reality which lacks sustainability and merely prolongs failure.

Dr. Luttwak sees disengagement, not withdrawal, as the only reasonable plan that still safeguards Iraq’s borders and doesn’t needlessly abandon Iraq to chaos.

Video fra New America Foundation den 1. marts 2007. Varighed: 1 time og 22 minutter.


Translations

Translate Danish to English Translate Danish to Arabic Translate Danish to Bulgarian Translate Danish to Catalan Google-Translate-Chinese (Simplified) BETA  Translate Danish to Traditional Chinese Translate Danish to Croatian Translate Danish to Czech Translate Danish to Dutch Translate Danish to Finnish Translate Danish to French Translate Danish to German Translate Danish to Greek Translate Danish to Hebrew Translate Danish to Hindi Translate Danish to Indonesian  Translate Danish to Italian Google-Translate-Danish to Japanese BETA Translate Danish to Korean BETA Translate Danish to Latvian Translate Danish to Lithuanian Translate Danish to Norwegian Translate Danish to Polish Translate Danish to Portuguese Translate Danish to Romanian Translate Danish to Russian Translate Danish to Serbian Translate Danish to Slovak Translate Danish to Slovene Translate Danish to Spanish Translate Danish to Swedish Translate Danish to Tagalog Translate Danish to Ukrainian Translate Danish to Vietnamese Warning: The English translation is hopeless

Ingen link herunder

Blogportaler

Polit-blogs

Politblogs

DanskeWeblogs.dk | Katalog over danske blogs

Kategorier

Fundet på Snaphanen:

Arkiv – dato

maj 2013
m ti o to f l s
« jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Arkiv – måned

Uriasposten om Danmarks Radio:

Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.

7. oktober 2007

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.