Posts Tagged 'Bernard-Henri Lévy'

Henryk Broder revser Günter Grass

Worldcrunch har oversat Broders artikel, der stammer fra Die Welt:

‘A Well-Meaning, Educated Anti-Semite’ – Günter Grass Slammed For Israel-Iran Poem

Op-Ed: The 84-year-old German Nobel laureate’s new poem entitled “What Must Be Said” accuses Israel of plotting to destroy Iran, while acknowledging the risk of being dubbed anti-Semitic. Grass’s long-hidden stint as a teen member of the Nazi SS doesn’t help his case.

Logo Worldcrunch

By Henryk M. Broder

Günter Grass has written a poem called “Was gesagt werden muss” (What Must Be Said) that was published Wednesday in Germany by the Süddeutsche Zeitung daily. It starts off like this:

“Why do I keep quiet, I’ve been holding back too long…”

From these opening lines, some readers might think that the 84-year-old German Nobel literature laureate is finally about to explain why he kept quiet for so long about his stint with the Nazi SS. But that’s not the case: the moralizing poet has moved on. This time it’s about an immediate concern to us all. It’s about sheer survival.

Mere HER i Worldcrunch.

Opdatering:

An Open Letter to Günter Grass

April 8, 2012 – by David P. Goldman

Herr Günter Grass:

By now you must be tired of hearing how shameful it is for a former SS man to denounce Israel as a threat to world peace at a time when the government of Iran (among others) publicly threatens to annihilate the Jewish state. It is obscene to suggest, as you did in your diatribe “What Must Be Said,” that Israel might “annihilate the Iranian people.” Now that we have that out of the way, I would to set you straight about your own country’s tragedy. It’s all your fault. Well, perhaps not exactly your fault, but the fault of your way of thinking and of people who thought like you. I am not talking about your enthusiastic service to the Nazis.  I am going to surprise you.

People tend to forget that you hate Germany and the Germans almost as much as you hate Israel and the Jews. When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and the disgusting German Democratic Republic collapsed, you will recall, you pleaded with your government to give this monster another lease on life — not to reunify Germany, but to keep the GDR intact. As I used to tell my German friends before Wiedervereinigung, if you Germans had been as smart as us Jews, you would have gotten your own national homeland right after the war, like we did. But you hate the Germans so much that you did not want them together in a single state. That doesn’t make us Jews feel any better, but your consistency is duly noted.

Mere HER i PJ Media.

Gunter Grass Shouldn’t Be Barred From Israel

by Alan M. Dershowitz – April 9, 2012

The decision by Israel’s Interior Minister to bar German writer, Gunter Grass, from entering the Jewish state is both foolish and self-defeating. Grass wrote an absurdly ignorant and perversely bigoted poem comparing Israel to Iran and declaring Israel to pose a great danger to world peace. He also warned Germany that by selling submarines to Israel, it is becoming complicit in a crime against humanity.

These wrong-headed views deserve to be rebutted on their demerits, as Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, did quite effectively in his public response to Grass, by exposing his “shameful moral equivalence between Israel and Iran, a regime that denies the Holocaust and threatens to annihilate Israel,” by pointing out that “it is Iran, not Israel, that threatens other states with annihilation,” and that it is Iran who supports the Syrian regime’s crackdown of its people and “stones women, hangs gays and brutally represses tens of millions of its own citizens.” Grass’ poem has also been effectively critiqued by Israelis across the political and literary spectrum. That is as it should be in an open, vibrant democracy, accustomed to rancorous public debate. But a great nation, committed to freedom of expression and dissent, should not bar a critic, even a critic as bigoted as Grass, from its territory.

Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. The Huffington Post her.

Günter Grass Goes From Bad to Verse

by Bruce Bawer on Apr 9th, 2012

The only surprising thing about the anti-Semitic “poem” that Günter Grass published last week, and that has created an international firestorm, is that he waited so long to write such a thing.  Anti-Semitism, after all, is all the rage these days among left-wing European literary intellectuals (excuse the multiple redundancy), and Grass has always prided himself on being in the forefront of these trends, not being a Johann-come-lately.

Who is Günter Grass, you ask?  For decades after the 1959 publication of his first and most famous (and highly overrated) novel, The Tin Drum, he was described by admirers as the conscience of postwar Germany.  His detractors had other words for him: smug, arrogant, obnoxious.  Even Richard Gilman, a writer for the left-wing The Nation whom one might have expected to celebrate the guy, complained in 1982 about his “lofty, hectoring tone,” stating: “Today there is no writer more swollen with self-importance…than Gunter Grass, who has begun to think of himself as identical with the fates of German literature, German politics, and German mores.”  John Updike, for his part, saw Grass as a “cautionary case” for politically engaged writers: “he can’t be bothered to write a novel; he just sends dispatches…from the front lines of his engagement.”

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Opdatering 12. april 2012:

The First Death of Günter Grass

Bernard-Henri Lévy – April 11, 2012

There is North Korea and its autistic tyrant, equipped with a by and large operational nuclear arsenal.

There is Pakistan, armed with warheads — no one knows how many, nor precisely where they are located, nor what guarantees we have that they will not, one day, fall into the hands of groups linked to Al Qaeda.

There is Putin’s Russia, which, in the space of two wars, has accomplished the exploit of exterminating a quarter of the population of Chechnya.

There is the butcher of Damascus, whose body count so far is at 10,000 and whose criminal stubbornness threatens the region’s peace.

Mere HER i Huffington Post. Kan også læses her hos Bernard-Henri Lévy.

Andre kilder: The Jerusalem Post, The Jerusalem Post, The Washington Post, Israel Hayom, The Telegraph, The Tablet,

Opdateret.

Toulouse

Artikler:

Fears of Anti-Semitism

More and More French Jews Emigrating to Israel

By Gil Yaron – March 22, 2012

More and more French Jews are buying homes in Israel amid fears of rising anti-Semitism in France. Many complain of being harrassed in public and feel the country is no longer a safe place to raise their children. In the wake of the Toulouse attacks, the wave of emigration is only likely to increase.

Many must have been reminded of the treatment of Jews under the Third Reich. Shortly after the attack on a Jewish school in the southern French city of Toulouse on Monday, school principals in the city walked into classrooms and asked the Jewish pupils to come forward. “We ask you to leave the class and join the other Jewish children, who are in a locked and safe location.”

Mere HER i Der Spiegel.

Mohamed Merah – Man of the West

By Caroline Glick – March 22, 2012

Caroline Glick Blog Banner

In addition to denying, justifying and inciting jihadist violence, Western elites and authorities also engage in facilitating it.

The massacre of Jewish children at the Ozar Hatorah Jewish day school in Toulouse presents us with an appalling encapsulation of the depraved nature of our times – although at first glance, the opposite seems to be the case.

On the surface, the situation was cut and dry. A murderer drove up to a Jewish school and executed three children and a teacher.

Led by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, all of France decried the massacre and announced its solidarity with the French Jewish community. World leaders condemned the crime. The killer died in a standoff with French security forces. Justice was served. Case closed.

Mere HER i The Jerusalem Post. Caroline Glick her.

Global Jihad

Slaughtering kids over a burqa ban

By Phyllis Chesler – March 23, 2012

In 2010, France became the first European country to ban the burqa.

The French law is religion-neutral; it refers only to generic “face coverings,” not to any particular religion. The French law imposed a fine of 150 euros ($190) and/or a citizenship course as punishment for wearing a face-covering veil. Forcing a woman to wear a niqab or a burqa became punishable by a year in prison or a 15,000 euro ($19,000) fine.

Immediately, al-Qaida threatened a terrorist action in France. Specifically, al-Qaida of the Islamic Maghreb (Algeria and Tunisia), warned of an imminent terrorist attack for daring to ban the burqa. Al-Qaida also threatened a Mumbai-like attack somewhere in Europe, most likely in France.

Mere HER hos WND. Flere pundits her – Daniel Greenfield, Mark Steyn, Melanie Phillips, Michael Coren:

Opdatering 26. marts 2012:

Brother of Suspected Jewish School Gunman Charged With Murder, Terrorism

March 25, 2012 by Madeleine Morgenstern

A Frenchman suspected of helping his brother plot attacks against Jewish schoolchildren and paratroopers was handed preliminary murder and terrorism charges Sunday.

But Abdelkader Merah denied any role in the attacks. Investigators looking into France’s worst terror attacks in years believe Merah helped his brother Mohamed prepare the killings, and are investigating whether they were linked to an international network of extremists or worked on their own.

Mere HER i The Blaze.

Toulouse, France, Islam

Bernard-Henri Lévy – March 26, 2012

The French police behaved well. I know that, down at the bar on the corner, there was a lot of talk about the RAID intervention group’s methods, the way the siege was drawn out, the brutality of the assault. And I know there are armchair investigators, prophets after the fact, and self-styled tracking experts about the region of Toulouse who are surprised that the future assassin wasn’t identified, even neutralized, before he went into action. Since France is a constitutional state and the possibility of committing a crime is not a misdemeanor, except in Philip Dick’s Minority Report, we shall not waste time on the second objection. As for the first, it leaves out the fact that the police did all they could, at the risk of their own lives, to spare the perpetrator of the slaughter and decided to fire only at mortal extremes because he left them no other choice. That is the reality. All the rest is just talk, or, sometimes, irresponsibility.

Mere HER i Huffington Post.

Opdatering 30. marts 2012 – mange ensomme ulve i Frankrig:

Eight days after the police shot dead the self-confessed killer of four Jews and three French paratroopers in southwestern France, elite units on Friday raided localities in several parts of the country and detained 17 people described as Islamic militants.

Mere HER i The New York Times.

Opdatering 29. maj 2012 fra The Jerusalem Post:

It is now known that the killer left the apartment at 1 a.m., two hours before the final assault, and walked 1 kilometer along the Avenue de la Gloire to a telephone booth where he called a journalist from the French/English/ Arabic TV channel, France 24.

The surveillance system put in place to cover Merah’s movements by the DCRI security agency (the Central Directorate of Interior Intelligence) totally failed, Le Parisien newspaper has now concluded, quoting an important agent from the agency: “The men in the surveillance position had fallen asleep, and because of that did not see Merah passing in front of them.”

Andre kilder: The Heritage Foundation, The New York Times, BBCFrontPageMagazine, FrontPageMagazine, Foreign PolicyForeign Policy, ICSR, Family Security Matters, PJ Media,

Video: Interview & forelæsning med Bernard-Henri Lévy

Forelæsningen nederst efterlader seeren fuldstændigt stum af forbløffelse. Hvordan kan man være så naiv? Først et interview, hvori Lévy fortæller om lidt af hvert - fra SHOWstudio den 16. december 2011:

SHOWstudio: In Your Face: Interviews – Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bernard-Henri Lévy, French philosopher and journalist, the founder of New Philosophers school, discusses his approach to philosophy and politics in the second interview of the In Your Face series – a twist on the coaxing, cajoling tradition of interviewing prevalent in art and fashion journalism, our ‘In Your Face’ interview series pits interviewer against interviewee in a collection of confrontational conversations. With subjects drawn from the worlds of art, fashion and celebrity this series pushes the boundaries of a typical face-to-face interview into a one-on-one face off.

Og dagdrømme om Libyen:

Talk: Bernard-Henri Lévy on the Libyan intervention and universal values – IQ2 talks

This talk took place at the Royal Geographical Society on 13th December 2011.

Event info:

Bernard-Henri Lévy

He was in Libya six times during the uprising. He was on the frontlines and amongst the very first foreigners to enter Tripoli the day after it was liberated. He took the rebel military commanders three times to meet Nicolas Sarkozy. He was with Sarkozy and Cameron in Benghazi and Tripoli and witnessed the curious nature of their relationship.

Bernard-Henri Lévy is France’s best-known public intellectual, passionately committed to the causes he believes to be just. In this rare appearance in London for Intelligence Squared BHL will be lecturing on liberal interventionism, the race for the US presidency, French politics, the crisis in Europe and what he really thinks about Cameron and Sarkozy.

Questions: Bernard-Henri Lévy on the Libyan intervention and universal values – IQ2 talks

Desuden en artikel om økonomi:

Downgrade Moody’s!

Bernard-Henri Lévy – Dec 14, 2011

Ratings agencies, with the careless batting of an eye, can bring down entire economies. Yet their decisions are veiled in mystery and cheapened by conflicts of interest.

These rating agencies, these institutes whose triple-As make the planet of finance quake and the real planet tremble, these oracles, these modern gods didn’t see the 1997 crisis coming. They understood nothing of the subprime catastrophe.  Four days before it went bankrupt, in 2001, they continued to give the energy broker Enron good marks. Up to the very last moment, they supported a Lehman Brothers that was circling the drain of bankruptcy. During the current euro-zone crisis, not content to have failed to see it coming, they aggravated the situation by keeping Greek securities in the basket of first class world bonds and, in so doing, contributed to the laxness of a government that preferred to sink deeper in debt rather than to review its accounts, clean up its public finances, and reform. In short, these agencies whose task it is to foresee have committed blunder after blunder. These agencies of credit have behaved like agencies of discredit. And the dictatorship they impose upon the markets stands back to back with faults, defaults, and an abuse of authority that might tempt one to laugh were the consequences not tragic.

Mere HER i The Daily Beast.

The Guardian interwiewer Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bernard-Henri Lévy: ‘I am more afraid of puritans than those who admit the weakness of the flesh’

The French philospher-intellectual on making enemies, advising President Sarkozy and his disgust at phone hacking

Carole Cadwalladr – 11 December 2011

The Guardian Banner

Your new book, a series of letters between you and Michel Houllebecq, is called Public Enemies, but it seems you weren’t so much enemies of each other but of everybody else?

We were both. The public believed that we were enemies. And we are both enemies of the crowd, the mob, how do you say? La meute. The pack.

Why do you think you inspire enmity?

Number one, I don’t know. Number two, I don’t care. And number three, the pack always loses against a writer or an artist. If you say there is something rotten, deeply corrupted, in the state of man’s affairs, then problems begin for you.

Mere HER i The Guardian.

Bernard-Henri Lévy om Libyen – igen

Der er travlhed ved håndvasken:

Libya, Sharia, and Us

Bernard-Henri Lévy – November 3, 2011

Logo Huffington PostWhat should we think of this sharia affair? Could it be that we have supported the insurgents of Benghazi, only to discover, when it’s all over, a State that forbids divorce and re-establishes polygamy? Details. Explanations.

1. It all began with one phrase. A single phrase. Of course, this phrase didn’t come from just anyone, since it was uttered by Mustafa Abdeljalil, the President of the National Transitional Council and father of the victory. But, president or not, Abdeljalil is a member of a Council whose decisions are collegial. And this Council is, as its name indicates, an organ of transition whose purpose is not to decree the laws of the future Libya.

Mere HER i Huffington Post.

Tariq Ramadan om… tja, om hvad?

Sikke en gang fis:

Political Islam will have to deal with clashing interests

Religion remains an unavoidable reference for the Arabs and as such will be critical in building the future

By Tariq Ramadan – November 1, 2011

Gulf News Logo SmallOver the last few weeks the new Libyan leader, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, chairman of the National Transitional Council (NTC), has been repeating, “Sharia will be the main reference and will be implemented in Libya.” Several of his references to Islamic legislation came in the presence of western politicians and intellectuals like the pro-Israel French self-styled philosopher Bernard Henri Levy, who, surprisingly, did not react with any shock whatsoever. Surprising indeed! It was as if Abdul Jalil was determined to show that the ‘Libyan revolutionaries’ were truly independent and not supported or protected by France, the US, or the West. The West kept silent, though some media have asked pointed questions about whom the French, the Americans and the British were supporting.

Mere HER hos Gulf News. Kan også læses her hos Tariq Ramadan.

Bernard-Henri Lévy om Gaddafis exit

Det findes i titusindvis af snik-snakkere, der regelmæssigt skræpper op i avisernes klummer. Pludselig en dag hev Nicolas Paul Stéphane Sárközy de Nagy-Bócsa filosoffen Bernard-Henri Lévy ud af hylekoret og brugte Lévys skriblerier som påskud for støtte til intervention i Libyen. Spørgsmålet er vel, om Sarkozy ikke havde gjort det samme uden Lévy som trædesten? Det er jeg ret sikker på, at Sarkozy ville have gjort:

A Moral Tipping Point

Bernard-Henri Lévy on the unsettling implications of Gaddafi’s gory end – Oct 23, 2011

Logo The Daily BeastThose Images of his corpse. That face, still alive but bloodied, hounded, and taunted. That bare head—suddenly and oddly bare! We were used to seeing him in turbans, and there was something poignant in the denuding that renders this criminal strangely pitiable.

You can say that the man was a monster. You can replay again and again the scenes that for eight months have haunted the friends of free Libya—the images of mass executions, torture, the hangings of April 7, the prisoners who were sort of buried alive until released from their prisons by the revolution—these and so many other victims of the dictatorship. [...]

Mere HER i The Daily Beast.

Andre kilder: The New York Times, Foreign Policy, Fox News, The Telegraph,

Video: Niall Ferguson, Jonathan Sacks, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Benjamin Netanyahu, Tony Blair

Altså. Jeg var lige på YouTube i aften og gik som sædvanlig i fælden: jeg gav mig til at se en konference – “Facing Tomorrow 2011 – The Israeli Presidential Conference” fra Jerusalem den 21. – 23. juni 2011. Jeg har plukket disse taler fra den:

Professor Niall Ferguson at Facing Tomorrow 2011

Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks at Facing Tomorrow 2011

Mr. Bernard-Henri Lévy at Facing Tomorrow 2011

H.E. Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu at Facing Tomorrow 2011

Rt. Hon Tony Blair at Facing Tomorrow 2011

Video & artikler: Bernard-Henri Lévy om 9/11 og Libyen

Lidt opsamling:

Ten Years Later

Bernard-Henri Lévy – September 11th, 2011

Ten years later, where, exactly, are we?

Al Qaeda, of course, is not entirely dead.

From the Sahel to Yemen, Nigeria to Uzbekistan and throughout the Caucasus, the metastasis of the terrorist cancer is ongoing.

The Taliban, which make up the greatest reserve army of Afghanistan, are, unfortunately, also gaining ground, thanks to the announced withdrawal of Western forces.

Mere HER i Huffington Post. Kan også læses her hos Bernard-Henri Lévy.

Victorious Return to Libya

Aug 29, 2011 – Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bernard-Henri Lévy returns to Libya and finds that while the land and its landmarks look familiar, everything has changed. He reports on what he saw.

Six Months Later, Tripoli

I could go through Tunisia and take the costal road.

I could return to Zintan and drive down to Jebel Nefusa via Gharyan.

Or I could fly from Benghazi to Misrata and take the route the insurgent troops opened up last Saturday, delivering the final blow General Ramadan Zarmuh had come to announce to French President Sarkozy on July 20.

I choose the third option.

Man kan også se en stump ikke-så-interessant video fra Libyen i artiklen – mere HER i The Daily Beast. Den næste artikel handler Bernard-Henri Lévy, Nicolas Sarkozy, Frankrig og Libyen:

Sarkozy’s Triumph over Gaddafi and De Gaulle

by Taylor Dinerman – September 1, 2011

Should President Obama get credit for the overthrow of Libyan Dictator Muammar Gaddafi?

The victory over Gaddafi clearly belongs foremost to the Libyans themselves. The rebels were able to organize a ramshackle but effective military machine that fought and defeated the regime’s regular army, as well as its special “regime protection” troops. So far the rebel victory is incomplete; the future of Libya is going to be messy, and probably will not result in anything Americans would recognize as democracy. But despite all the future dangers, the fall of Gaddafi’s regime is something to be celebrated.

Much of the credit should also go to the world leader who, early on, decided to bet on the rebels: France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy. After some prodding from the celebrity intellectual, Bernard Henri Levy, Sarkozy began to lobby the rest of the West, especially US President Barack Obama and a few Arab governments,against Gaddafi.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.

Desuden denne video om Libyen. Den har ligget på  YouTube siden maj, men jeg har ikke set den før nu. Fra BBC den 16. maj 2011 – intervieweren hedder Stephen Sackur:

HARDtalk – Bernard-Henri Levy, French philosopher and journalist

Bernard-Henri Levy . Born November 5, 1948) is a French public intellectual, philosopher and journalist. Often referred to today, in France, simply as BHL. He was one of the leaders of the “Nouvelle Philosophie” (New Philosophy) movement in 1976. Discusses the current uprising in Libya

Andre kilder: Haaretz, Ennahar Online, Mondoweiss, The New English Review, Gawker, Iranian,

Pundits, Bernard-Henri Lévy og Libyen

Jeg orker ikke rigtig Libyen. Må jeg tilstå. Men Bernard-Henri Lévy er dybt engageret i Libyen-krigen. Her skriver han om den:

Libya Wins One for Freedom

Aug 22, 2011 – Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bernard-Henri Lévy pays homage to Sarkozy’s gamble, the U.S. and European airmen—and above all the Libyan rebels, who have written a new page in the history of their country.

We’ve heard it all!

They were getting bogged down in this war.

The insurgents were disorganized, undisciplined, lightweights.

Det er for meget. Mere HER i The Daily Beast. Bernard-Henri Lévy’s hjemmeside her. Og om samme forfatter:

Is Bernard-Henri Lévy having the best week ever?

Logo Foreign Policy Small

By Joshua Keating – August 22, 2011

Last spring, it seemed like everyone was hating on French philosopher/public intellectual/serial chest-hair exhibitionist Bernard-Henri Lévy. It was bad enough that he had helped push President Nicolas Sarkozy’s government into an intervention in Libya that appeared to be settling into an endless quagmire. Then in May, he was pilloried for going on record to defend his friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn from sexual assault charges that he compared to a lynching and the Dreyfus Affair. Some even went as far as to wonder whether the Libya invasion would have happened if the Strauss-Kahn affair, and the damage to BHL’s reputation that ensued, had come first.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy. Oprørene er i det store hele slået ud af Tripoli. Gaddafi’s søn, Saif al-Islam, er dukket op på Rixos Hotel, skriver The Washington Post. Han skulle ellers være blevet kidnappet af “oprørere”. En anden af Gaddfi’s sønner skulle være undsluppet husarrest, skriver The New York Times. Men det er sket efter denne artikel blev skrevet:

Arab August

Diana West – August 23, 2011

With non-Constitutionally-US-supported anti-Qadaffi forces taking Tripoli yesterday, it looks as if — to be as delicate as a NATO commander — the “flickers” of Al Qaeda and Hezbollah have won. In franker words, America’s jihadist allies, a significant presence among the Libyan “rebels,” are now rising to power in Libya. In more startling terms, the same people who fought with al Qaeda against Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan (and committed unreported atrocities in Libya), are now, thanks to the US taxpayer, very likely about to run or at least help run a state with the ninth largest oil reserves in the world.

But don’t worry. Assistant Secretary of State Jeffrey Feltman was in Benghazi all weekend, making sure everything works out all right.

Mere HER hos Family Security Matters. Big Peace her. Diana West har mere om Libyen på sin blog her.

The New Libyan Zabibah-stan, Made Safe for Sharia?

Andrew Bostom – August 23, 2011

Zabibah-prominent* Libyan “rebel” spokesperson Mustafa Abduljalil, born in 1952 in Al Baida, one of the first cities to rise against Gaddafi, studied law and Islamic jurisprudence in Benghazi before embarking on a legal career that culminated in his appointment in 2007 as Qaddafi’s “minister of justice.” A Wikileaks memo from 1/27/2010 revealed,

In the course of the discussion of the Criminal Code, Abduljalil abruptly changed the subject from freedom of speech to the “Libyan people’s concern about the U.S. government’s support for Israel.”He averred that Libya cares deeply about Muslims everywhere, and about Muslim countries. In his view, the root cause of terrorism stems from the perception that Europe and the U.S. are against Muslims.

Mere HER i Family Security Matters. Big Peace her. Man kan se forfatnings-udkastet i den næste artikel:

Libyan Draft Constitution: Sharia is ‘Principal Source of Legislation’

Lachlan Markay – August 22, 2011

The dust has not yet settled over the Libyan capital of Tripoli since rebels took control over the weekend. But already, a draft constitutional charter for the transitional state has appeared online (embedded below). It is just a draft, mind you, and gauging its authenticity at this point is difficult. There is also no way to know whether this draft or something similar will emerge as the final governing document for a new Libyan regime.

Mere HER hos Heritage Foundation. Kan også læses her hos Free Republic.

Andre kilder: The Washington Post, Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy, National Review Online, National Review Online, National Review OnlineDaniel Pipes,

Bernard-Henri Lévy – upopulær?

The Strenuous Life

How Bernard-Henri Levy fought his way into chronic interventionism

Summer 2011 – Christopher Caldwell

Bernard-Henri LévyI. Last year, Karl Zéro, the madcap newsman/comedian who has been a fixture on French television for a decade, asked the sixty-one-year-old celebrity philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy why people hated him so. Perhaps, Zéro speculated, it had to do with dual identity. There was Bernard-Henri Lévy, who launched his career in the 1970s with La Barbarie à visage humain (Barbarism with a Human Face), an attack on Communism, and who in the decades since had written three dozen more books, most of them about current affairs, and many of them best sellers. Then there was BHL (“Bay-Arsh-Ell”), as he was called in the gossip magazines, the very wealthy heir to a lumber fortune, who owned John Paul Getty’s old palace in Marrakech, who had married a fashion model, and who had counted the country’s last three presidents among his personal friends. Zéro seemed to suggest that the glamour and privilege of BHL clashed with the roles that Lévy accorded himself in his writings—Tribune of Democracy and Conscience of France.

Lévy had another theory. He believed he provoked strong feelings among French people because he was right so often. “Because I was right about Bosnia,” he said. “Because I was right about Rwanda. Because I was right about Darfur. Because I was right about Communism.”

Mere HER hos Book Forum. Kan også læses her hos The University of Utah.

Opdatering 21. juli 2011 – en boganmeldelse:

Guilty Men

The political origins of the meltdown

Jul 25, 2011 • By Christopher Caldwell

How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon by Gretchen Morgenson & Joshua Rosner

Mere HER i The Weekly Standard.

Opdatering 11. august 2011 – fanklubben svinder ind:

Bernard-Henri Lévy Just Can’t Shut Up

Hugh Fitzgerald – 8 August 2011

I’m so glad I don’t have to see, or read, or hear about, BHL more than I already do, and feel sorry for those who, living in France, can’t escape him, can’t avoid seeing him on television.

Here he is, unrepentant, in the Khaleej Times:

Mere HER i New English Review.

Video: Bernard-Henri Lévy & Tzipi Livni

EUs vanvittige løfter til Gaddafi om penge, hjælp til atomteknologi, studiepladser i Europa, indvandring og hvad ved jeg, må have alt at gøre med krigen i Libyen. Hvis Gaddafi pludselig ikke eksisterede længere, kunne EU hævde, at aftaler med diktatoren ikke længere gælder, eftersom han er væk. Men det snakkes der selvfølgelig ikke om:

Israel and The Arab Spring – Bernard-Henri Lévy & MK Tzipi Livni

Bernard-Henri Lévy, Author and Philosopher and MK Tzipi Livni, Leader of the Opposition in the Knesset. Held at the Tel Aviv University, 2.6.11

Ordstyren formår ikke at få det optimale ud af sine gæster. Debatten er okay, men så er det også sagt:

Video & artikel: Hvad har Bernard-Henri Lévy gang i?

Det ser unægteligt sært ud. Men måske han er blevet snydt af lidt tvetunget taqiyya? Det er jo sket før. Først en artikel:

Bernard-Henri Levy blunders on Israeli-Libyan ‘mission’

By Leela Jacinto – June 10, 2011

Bernard-Henri Levy is known to weigh in on weighty international issues. But when the controversial French philosopher-writer took it upon himself to mediate a détente between Libya and Israel, he apparently went too far.

Bernard-Henri Levy, France’s arguably most flamboyant, unbuttoned, unplugged public intellectual seems to have talked his way into a controversy – again.

The French philosopher-writer commonly known as BHL is no stranger to the faux pas – one particularly embarrassing gaffe involved him citing a blatantly fake philosopher.

This time though, the flap revolves around the delicate business of Arab-Israeli relations. But curiously for a man whose exploits are frequently – some would say too frequently – under the spotlight, the latest controversy appears to have slipped under domestic and international radars.

Nå, Libyen vil ikke have gode forbindelser til Israel alligevel. Hvor er man dog overrasket. Mere HER hos France24. Og video fra CNN 3. april 2011:

Bernard-Henri Lévy,: The Man Who Pushed Sarkozy

Is this the man who helped French President Nicolas Sarkozy launch the war in Libya? Fareed Zakaria spoke to controversial philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy about his role in prompting the allies’ intervention. Sarkozy’s main motivator: guilt for failing to help Rwanda.

Og endnu en artikel – af Bernard-Henri Lévy. Lidt opskruet:

Urbicide in Misrata

Bernard-Henri Lévy – Juni 10, 2011

Rent a boat we happened on at Malta, since Misrata, surrounded by Qadhafi’s troops and cut off from the world, can be reached only by sea.

After being turned down several times, find a Maltese sailor who, eager to make a dent in the debt he has incurred for his daughter’s wedding next week, agrees to make the crossing with me and the members of the Libyan opposition who have accompanied me from France — Ali Zeidan, Mansur Sayf al-Nasr, Bashir Sabbah, and Souleiman Fortia — at the last minute, even though he is completely unfamiliar with the boat.

Mere HER i Huffington Post.

Andre kilder: The Daily Beast,

Christopher Caldwell om Libyen

Lessons from Kosovo for Libya campaign

by Christopher Caldwell | Jun 10, 2011

Logo iPolitics

This weekend marks a curious anniversary. Twelve years ago, Nato’s air war to wrest the province of Kosovo from Serbia’s control ended after almost three months. The allies achieved their professed war aims: Kosovar autonomy and an end to Serbian counter-insurgency measures, which Nato described as genocidal. But Serbian resistance was tougher than anticipated and western publics began to fear the war was going terribly wrong. The fears were well-grounded. There were two big consequences of Kosovo. First was a deepening Russian distrust of Nato’s aims. That led to Vladimir Putin. Second was an end to the principle that a sovereign ruler’s mistreatment of his own subjects is not grounds for war. That led to the invasion of Iraq.

What makes the Kosovo anniversary curious is that Nato’s mission in Libya is so similar. As in Kosovo, the west intervened to prevent a humanitarian tragedy and has wound up engaged in a civil war on the side of an insurgency.

Mere HER i iPolitics. Jeg fandt desuden dette fra marts 2011. Yderst interessant. Blandt andre disse herrer vil have krig: Pascal Bruckner, André Glucksmann, Bernard Kouchner, Bernard-Henri Lévy. Her er resten – åbent brev om Libyen fra:

Historian Nicole Bacharan, artist Jane Birkin, writer Pascal Bruckner, European Parliament member Daniel Cohn-Bendit, philosopher André Glucksmann, former cabinet minister, Nicole Guedj, publisher Gilles Hertzog, former Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, philosopher and member of the editorial board of Le Monde Group Bernard-Henri Lévy, publisher Oliver Rolin, publisher Olivier Rubinstein, writer Dominique Simmonet.

Dette er, hvad de skriver:

Remember Rwanda…And Guernica! An Urgent European Call For Immediate Western Intervention In Libya

Logo Worldcrunch

A group of leading French intellectuals and politicians make the case for immediate Western intervention in Libya, including possible military strikes against Gaddafi’s forces.

March 17th, 2011

Time is pressing in Libya. Day after day, hour after hour, the dictator Muammar Gaddafi, with his murderous army of airplanes, helicopters, tanks, missiles and mercenaries, is retaking his country and crushing the efforts of the Libyan people to break free. The tyrant seems determined to drown his country in “rivers of blood” — machine-gunning civilian populations, “purging” the towns of his opponents and sowing terror. Everywhere, in Tripoli and the other regions retaken by Gaddafi’s forces, large numbers of men have been abducted, taken to torture cells and murdered.

Mere HER i Worldcrunch.

Rwanda og Guernica ?? Så kan det vist heller ikke blive mere hysterisk…

Pundits om Bin Laden

Har samlet lidt af, hvad der skrives rundt omkring. Salman Rushdie, Christopher Hitchens, Paul Berman, Robert Fisk, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Robert Spencer, Alan Dershowitz, Nonie Darwish, Victor Davis Hanson, Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens, Steve Coll, Raymond Ibrahim, Sol Stern:

Salman Rushdie: Pakistan’s Deadly Game

by Salman Rushdie

Are we really supposed to believe that Pakistan didn’t know Osama bin Laden was living there for five years? Salman Rushdie on why it’s time to declare the country a terrorist state.

Osama bin Laden died on Walpurgisnacht, the night of black sabbaths and bonfires. Not an inappropriate night for the Chief Witch to fall off his broomstick and perish in a fierce firefight. One of the most common status updates on Facebook after the news broke was “Ding, Dong, the witch is dead,” and that spirit of Munchkin celebration was apparent in the faces of the crowds chanting “U-S-A!” last night outside the White House and at ground zero and elsewhere. Almost a decade after the horror of 9/11, the long manhunt had found its quarry, and Americans will be feeling less helpless this morning, and pleased at the message that his death sends: “Attack us and we will hunt you down, and you will not escape.”

Mere HER i The Daily Beast. Kan også læses her i Business Insider.

Death of a Madman

What Obama does next will help define the legacy of Osama Bin Laden.

By Christopher Hitchens – May 2, 2011

Logo Slate

There are several pleasant little towns like Abbottabad in Pakistan, strung out along the roads that lead toward the mountains from Rawalpindi (the garrison town of Pakistani’s military brass and, until 2003, a safe-house for Khalid Sheik Muhammed). Muzaffarabad, Abbottabad … cool in summer and winter, with majestic views and discreet amenities. The colonial British—like Maj. James Abbott, who gave his name to this one—called them “hill stations,” designed for the rest and recreation of commissioned officers. The charming idea, like the location itself, survives among the Pakistani officer corps. If you tell me that you are staying in a rather nice walled compound in Abbottabad, I can tell you in return that you are the honored guest of a military establishment that annually consumes several billion dollars of American aid. It’s the sheer blatancy of it that catches the breath.

Mere HER i Slate. Kan også læses her i The National Post.

Relentless

Understanding the symbolism of Osama bin Laden’s death in the history of American democracy.

May 2, 2011 | Paul Berman

Relentlessness is good. Relentlessness has a philosophical resonance, which everyone intuitively understands. The war between Al Qaeda and the United States has always rested on a dispute over the meaning of history. Al Qaeda has always believed that God wishes the resurrection of the ancient Islamic caliphate. And Al Qaeda has always regarded America, as the product of Christian civilization, as the ultimate obstacle to the resurrection of the caliphate. Al Qaeda’s militants have always believed that, as the representative of God’s will, they will ultimately win. Al Qaeda has therefore been engaged in a long-term and even eternal struggle—the kind of struggle that might lead earnest and idealistic people to agree to commit suicide on Al Qaeda’s behalf.

Mere HER i The New Republic. Og lidt fra den røde fløj:

The death of Bin Laden

Was he betrayed? Of course. Pakistan knew Bin Laden’s hiding place all along

By Robert Fisk – 3 May 2011

A middle-aged nonentity, a political failure outstripped by history – by the millions of Arabs demanding freedom and democracy in the Middle East – died in Pakistan yesterday. And then the world went mad.

Fresh from providing us with a copy of his birth certificate, the American President turned up in the middle of the night to provide us with a live-time death certificate for Osama bin Laden, killed in a town named after a major in the army of the old British Empire. A single shot to the head, we were told. But the body’s secret flight to Afghanistan, an equally secret burial at sea? The weird and creepy disposal of the body – no shrines, please – was almost as creepy as the man and his vicious organisation.

Mere HER i The Independent. Robert Fisk har yderligere to artikler om Bin Laden:

Robert Fisk: My deadliest moment with the world’s most dangerous men

19 March 1997. There was a sudden scratching of voices outside the tent, thin and urgent like the soundtrack of an old movie. Then the flap snapped up and Bin Laden walked in, dressed in a turban and green robes.

Mere i The Independent HER.

Robert Fisk: A close encounter with the man who shook the world

One hot evening in late June 1996, the telephone on my desk in Beirut rang with one of the more extraordinary messages I was to receive as a foreign correspondent. “Mr Robert, a friend you met in Sudan wants to see you,” said a voice in English but with an Arabic accent.

Mere HER i The Independent.

The Death of Bin Laden and the Pakistan Question

by Bernard-Henri Lévy

Bin Laden is dead.

In a sense, he was already dead.

And for a long while, no one believed any longer in the prospect he had outlined of a radical Islam that would take the place of communism and its world ambitions.

But he is, indeed, dead, and this time for good.

Mere HER i Huffington Post.

Osama Gets His Virgins

by Robert Spencer  – May 2, 2011

Osama bin Laden has gone to the great bordello in the sky that awaits every good jihadi.

Barack Obama explained that the jihadist mastermind was killed in a “targeted operation: at Abbottabad, Pakistan: “A small team of Americans carried out the operation. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.”

Obama also said that the killing of bin Laden was the “most significant achievement to date” in America’s war against al-Qaeda.

Mere HER i Human Events.

Targeted Killing Vindicated

by Alan M. Dershowitz – May 2, 2011

The decision to target and kill Osama Bin Laden is being applauded by all decent people. Approval to capture or kill this mass-murdering terrorist leader was given by Presidents Obama and Bush. It was the right decision, both morally and legally.

Although Bin Laden wore no military uniform and held no official military rank, he was an appropriate military target. As the titular and spiritual head of Al Qaeda, he was the functional equivalent of a head of state or commander in chief of a terrorist army. From the beginning of recorded history, killing the king was the legitimate object of military action. The very phrase “check mate” means “the king is dead, “signifying the successful end of the battle.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.  Kan også læses her i Huffington Post.

Why It Took Ten Years

by Nonie Darwish on May 2nd, 2011

America failed to locate Osama Bin Laden for almost 10 years not because it wasn’t trying hard to find him, or because American intelligence is incompetent. It took so long because the Godfather of Terror was surrounded by many Muslims who would rather protect him with their lives than give him up to America — and no amount of financial reward was going to convince them to give him up.

There is no doubt that many Muslim leaders knew exactly where Osama was hiding — and that it was not in the caves of Pakistan and Afghanistan, but in a huge mansion with very high fences that indicated to the whole neighborhood that someone big was hiding there. Nothing happens in a Muslim country without the knowledge of its intelligence and leadership. Also nothing goes unnoticed in a Muslim neighborhood where people habitually monitor activities on the streets and who comes in or goes out of homes.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. Næsten identisk udgave hos Big Peace her.

Bin Laden — Ne Requiescat in Pace

May 2, 2011 – By Victor Davis Hanson 

The death of bin Laden is as welcome as it raises strange afterthoughts. First, what a relief that we are all united in joy at the news. Second, it is a relief that he was not captured by a foreign nation. And good too that we did not bring him back alive to repeat the KSM fiasco. It is also fortuitous that his demise came at the hands of U.S. soldiers in battle on the ground, rather than from the air via Predator drones — it reflects far better on the audacity and skill of our troops, and, far more importantly, allows us to bring his corpse back for positive I.D.

Mere HER i National Review Online. Kan også læses her i Free Republic.

Analysis: Al-Qaeda After Bin Laden

The loss of a figurehead as iconic as Osama bin Laden will come as a blow to al-Qaeda and its supporters, but is unlikely to fatally undermine the movement.

2nd May 2011 – Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens

Early responses on jihadist internet forums eulogise him as a figurehead and lament his loss, but insist that this will not diminish their determination to continue the jihadist cause.

Mere i Standpoint Magazine HER. Kan også læses her hos ICSR, King’s College London.

Notes on the Death of Osama bin Laden

May 2, 2011 by Steve Coll

No doubt there will be time to reflect more deeply about the news announced by President Obama last night. For now, I thought it might be useful to annotate some of the initial headlines.

On where he was found:

Abbottabad is essentially a military-cantonment city in Pakistan, in the hills to the north of the capital of Islamabad, in an area where much of the land is controlled or owned by the Pakistani Army and retired Army officers. Although the city is technically in what used to be called the Northwest Frontier Province, it lies on the far eastern side of the province and is as close to Pakistani-held Kashmir as it is to the border city of Peshawar. The city is most notable for housing the Pakistan Military Academy, the Pakistani Army’s premier training college, equivalent to West Point. [...]

Mere HER i The New Yorker. Kan også læses her hos the New America Foundation.

“The Struggle between Truth [Islam] and Falsehood [Non-Islam] Transcends Time”

by Raymond Ibrahim – May 3, 2011

Islamists — whether Bin Laden, Khomeini, Banna, Qutb, or Yassin— are not the cause of hostilities; they are symptoms of a much greater cause: what they call “The struggle between Truth [Islam] and Falsehood [non-Islam][that] transcends time.” Individually killing them off — which is nice — only temporarily treats the symptom; it does not eliminate the cause that motivates them. Ayman al-Zawahiri, now al-Qaeda’s presumed leader, once summarized this phenomenon well. Asked in an interview about the status of bin Laden and the Taliban’s Mullah Omar, he confidently replied:

“Jihad in the path of Allah is greater than any individual or organization. It is a struggle between Truth and Falsehood, until Allah Almighty inherits the earth and those who live in it. Mullah Muhammad Omar and Sheikh Osama bin Laden — may Allah protect them from all evil — are merely two soldiers of Islam in the journey of jihad, while the struggle between Truth [Islam] and Falsehood [non-Islam] transcends time (The Al Qaeda Reader, p.182).”

Mere HER hos Hudson New York. Kan også læses i en næsten identisk version i Middle East Forum her.

Solidarity, Then and Now

What Obama didn’t say

By Sol Stern – 2 May 2011

Like many other Americans, I’m sure, I found myself choking up during President Obama’s announcement that U.S. forces had killed Osama bin Laden in a firefight, and even more so at the scenes of spontaneous rejoicing at Ground Zero in Manhattan. The news unleashed a cascade of powerful 9/11 memories. My 14-year-old son had watched the second hijacked plane hit the South Tower from the windows of his classroom at Stuyvesant High School, just a few hundred yards from the carnage. [...]

Mere HER i City Journal.

Opdatering 5. maj 2011 – Diana West har illustreret sin artikel med Kurt Westergaards berømte tegning:

Dead Bin Laden: The Ultimate Danish Cartoon

Posted by Diana West May 4th 2011

I’ve had a sneaking suspicion that the Obama White House would ultimately nix the release of Dead Bin Laden, and here it comes, the prepatory rumblings: Gates and Hillary, ABC’s Jake Tapper reports (via Drudge) are arguing against release. This tagteam pushback, Tapper writes with soothing gentility, is due to “concerns at the Pentagon and State Department that releasing a photograph could prompt a backlash against the US for killing bin Laden where one does not seem to currently exist.”

Mere HER i Big Peace. Kan også læses her på Diana Wests blog.

Andre kilder: The Daily Mail, The Daily Mail, The Daily Mail,

Interview med Bernard-Henri Levy

Hvilken rolle spiller Bernard-Henri Levy i Libyen-krigen?

Philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy speaks of his role in France’s push against Kadafi

The public intellectual Bernard-Henri Levy is credited with a key role in persuading French President Nicolas Sarkozy to spearhead a drive for military intervention in Libya. He invoked the flag.

By Devorah Lauter – April 17, 2011

Logo Los Angeles Times 2

French President Nicolas Sarkozy shocked the world by leading the push for a United Nations resolution to use force against Moammar Kadafi in his battle with rebels, and then unleashing French jets to launch the first airstrikes against the Libyan leader’s forces.

Perhaps more shocking, a celebrity French philosopher has been given much of the credit for sparking the chain of events.

A dandied-up French slant on Hemingway, in his bold activism, literary prolificacy and habit of baring a tan chest in unbuttoned white shirts, Bernard-Henri Levy never goes unnoticed.

Mere HER i Los Angeles Times.

Der Spiegel interviewer Bernard-Henri Lévy

Spiegel Interview with Bernard-Henri Lévy

‘We Lost a Great Deal of Time in Libya Because of the Germans’

March 30, 2011

Logo Der Spiegel Banner

French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy has been a fierce proponent of military intervention in Libya. SPIEGEL spoke with him about Germany’s “shameful” abstention from the UN Security Council resolution, the democratic leanings of rebel leaders in Libya and why some in the West might want the Arab spring to come to an end.

Spiegel: Monsieur Lévy, are you satisfied with your war?

Lévy: I don’t call this war. It’s Gadhafi who is waging a war.

Spiegel: What then do you call what allied bombers are doing in Libya?

Lévy: The bombers are preventing Gadhafi from waging his war. A war against his own people and against the international community.

Mere HER i Der Spiegel.

Opdatering 4. april 2011 – Newsweek med en artikel:

Why Sarkozy Went to War

My philosopher made me do it! France’s president needed help taking down Gaddafi. He got it from the intellectual swashbuckler Bernard-Henri Lévy.

Mere HER i Newsweek.

Lidt artikler om Libyen

Answers to Three Questions About Libya

By Bernard-Henri Lévy – March 28, 2011

Is this a just war? The word seems to make people edgy. And the time of reasonable debate (without risk of attracting the thunder of sovereignist neopacifism) on this very old concept of political philosophy one would have thought had proven its theoretical validity, from the Dominican Francisco de Vitoria to the American Michael Walzer, is in the past. Then, let’s say inevitable war. Let’s say that, confronted with a rabid tyrant, when a people’s right to self-determination becomes the right of the tyrant to determine their fate, when he, the tyrant, claims the double principle of sovereignty (a man’s home is his castle; what happens within my borders is my affair and mine alone) and of equality of States before the law (a crazy putschist, a professional criminal, is equal to a democrat, therefore nothing and no one has the right to curb his bloodthirsty impulses), moral law dictates, yes, that one must intervene to stop him. This is what has just occurred in Libya. [...]

Mere HER i Huffington Post. Og en Dry Bones:

Dry Bones - March 30, 2011

Den næste artikel citeres en hel del rundt omkring:

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.

By Praveen Swami, Nick Squires and Duncan Gardham – 25 Mar 2011

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited “around 25″ men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are “today are on the front lines in Adjabiya”.

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but added that the “members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader”.

Mere HER i The Telegraph.

It’s Not That Qaddafi Was Right, It’s That We Knew He Was Right

Andrew McCarthy – March 29, 2011

Jonah Goldberg and Mark Steyn went back and forth over the weekend on the question of whether Qaddafi has been right in saying that the “’rebels’ are al Qaeda.” In particular, Jonah pointed to the reports about the “rebel” commander Abdul Hakim al-Hasadi (alternatively referred to as al-Hasidi), a member of the Qaeda-connected Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who was detained by the U.S. for several years after his capture in 2002. (I discussed al-Hasadi in my weekend column.)

Mere HER hos Family Security Matters.

Wars People Want: Fantasy Results Without Realistic Repercussions

by Rachel Marsden – March 28, 2011

France’s “Ifop” polling organization last week provided some rare insights into the French people’s ideas on military action. In an about-face from their allergic reaction to entering Iraq, 66% of French people now favor “the military coalition in Libya, notably comprising France, the UK, and the USA against Colonel Gaddafi’s forces” – nearly a full 20% higher favorability rating than a Gallup poll of Americans on the same issue. It could just be that Americans do not see a good reason for getting involved, while the French do. But there may be some other factors at play.

Less than three weeks earlier, the same question had elicited a favorable response from only 36% of French – a figure that would have put them well below even American support. So what happened in the interim to win the French over so drastically? The French probably noticed that this war was thus far not resulting in mass military casualties caused by intervening coalition forces – at least not in quantities that might be considered “immoderate.” [...]

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.

Andre kilder: The American,

Bernard-Henri Lévy om Frankrig og Libyen

Igen: Hvilken rolle spillede Bernard-Henri Lévy i besutningen om intervention i Libyen? The Guardian og The Christian Science Monitor har spurgt ham:

Libya: Bernard-Henri Lévy dismisses criticism for leading France to conflict

Logo The Guardian Small 2Philosopher says criticism of dealings with Sarkozy of no importance compared with ‘avoiding a bloodbath in Benghazi’

Kim Willsher – 27 March 2011

Criticism? Bernard-Henri Lévy waves his hands as if dismissing an irritating insect buzzing around him in the Café de Flore. “I say to my critics, you are right, but in that case you do your job and I will do mine,” he says. “All they have to do is do their job, and I don’t have to do this.”

Unruffled as ever in his trademark Charvet white shirt, half-unbuttoned to reveal his tanned chest, the 62-year-old French philosopher is used to being in the line of fire – some of it, from Bosnia in the 1990s and Burundi in 2000, all too real and dangerous.

Mere HER i The Guardian. Og endnu et interview:

Bernard-Henri Levy: War in Iraq was detestable. War in Libya was inevitable.

Bernard-Henri Levy, the French author and philosopher played a key role in convincing French president Nicolas Sarkozy to recognize the Libyan rebels’ transitional government and establish the no-fly zone. Here he discusses the mission in Libya and the importance of ousting Qaddafi.

March 26, 2011

Bernard-Henri Levy, the French author and philosopher (his latest book is “Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism”), has played a high-profile role in convincing French President Nicolas Sarkozy to take the lead in recognizing the rebels in Libya and establishing the no-fly zone. He spoke with Global Viewpoint Network editor Nathan Gardels on Thursday.

Nathan Gardels: It’s been said that you have played the key role in convincing Sarkozy to enter into this war.

Bernard-Henri Levy: The key role, I don’t know. President Sarkozy is certainly old enough to know what he has to do. Especially since, as you may know, I am a fierce opponent of his policies. I didn’t vote for him in 2007. I will not vote for him in 2012. And he knows it.

Mere HER i The Christian Science Monitor. Se eventuelt også denne post:

Opdatering 29. marts 2011 – læs også på FrumForum:

According to an unofficial Sarkozy advisor speaking on condition of anonymity:

Bernard-Henri rang him from Benghazi to tell him that French flags were everywhere. He told him that if he allowed a bloodbath there the blood would stain the French flag. That really affected him.

Mere HER hos FrumForum.

Bernard-Henri Lévys rolle i aktionen i Libyen?

Det lyder interessant:

Did Bernard-Henri Lévy Take NATO to War?

By Richard Brody – March 25, 2011

Logo The New Yorker Banner

Paris is France’s New York, its Hollywood, and its Washington, D.C.—the country’s political, artistic, financial, and cinematic capital. As a result, in France these domains are intertwined with an unusual, and often surprising, intimacy. In particular, the politicization of intellectuals—and the converse, the intellectualization of politics—has been a key feature of French life at least since the eighteenth century. In the runup to France’s military engagement against Qaddafi’s regime in Libya, that trend seems to have taken a strange practical twist: the French writer Bernard-Henri Lévy—who began his career, in the seventies, as a political philosopher and has been an extraordinarily prominent media figure—played a vigorous role in rallying the French government, and perhaps even our own, to the cause of military intervention on behalf of the Libyan uprising.

My attention was piqued by his surprising presence in a March 10th article in Le Monde, about France’s breaking of diplomatic relations with Qaddafi’s government and recognition of the National Transition Council as Libya’s legitimate government. The announcement was made in Paris after the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, met with three representatives of the Council. The article adds:

Mere HER i The New Yorker. Kan også læses her på Bernard-Henri Lévys hjemmeside.

Andre kilder: Le Monde Diplomatique, Le Monde Diplomatique, Huffington Post, Huffington Post, Huffington Post, Huffington Post, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Le Figaro,


Translations

Translate Danish to English Translate Danish to Arabic Translate Danish to Bulgarian Translate Danish to Catalan Google-Translate-Chinese (Simplified) BETA  Translate Danish to Traditional Chinese Translate Danish to Croatian Translate Danish to Czech Translate Danish to Dutch Translate Danish to Finnish Translate Danish to French Translate Danish to German Translate Danish to Greek Translate Danish to Hebrew Translate Danish to Hindi Translate Danish to Indonesian  Translate Danish to Italian Google-Translate-Danish to Japanese BETA Translate Danish to Korean BETA Translate Danish to Latvian Translate Danish to Lithuanian Translate Danish to Norwegian Translate Danish to Polish Translate Danish to Portuguese Translate Danish to Romanian Translate Danish to Russian Translate Danish to Serbian Translate Danish to Slovak Translate Danish to Slovene Translate Danish to Spanish Translate Danish to Swedish Translate Danish to Tagalog Translate Danish to Ukrainian Translate Danish to Vietnamese Warning: The English translation is hopeless

Ingen link herunder

Blogportaler

Polit-blogs

Politblogs

DanskeWeblogs.dk | Katalog over danske blogs

Kategorier

Fundet på Snaphanen:

Arkiv – dato

maj 2013
m ti o to f l s
« jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Arkiv – måned

Uriasposten om Danmarks Radio:

Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.

7. oktober 2007

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.