Roger Scruton skriver i Sappho

Et par artikler:

Vaclav Havel: Forpligtelsen til sandhed

01. januar 2012 – klumme af Roger Scruton

Den engelske filosof Roger Scruton minder os om Vaclavs Havels altid aktuelle totalitarisme-kritik i dette essay om den afdøde præsident og tidligere dissident.

Mere HER i Sappho.

Nye juletraditioner

28. december 2011 – klumme af Dan Ritto

Tidligere næstformand i Multikulturel Forening, Dan Ritto, kaster et kritisk blik på nye juletendenser og advarer om, hvad vi kan have i vente.

Mere HER i Sappho.

Husk mødet om Lars Kragh Andersens sag den 10. januar 2011 – mere HER hos Trykkefrihedsselskabet.

Mere om euroen

Euroen kan ikke lade sig gøre. Indse det dog. Hannans artikel lidt længere nede i posten, er ret god:

Is this really the end?

Unless Germany and the ECB move quickly, the single currency’s collapse is looming

Nov 26th 2011

Even as the euro zone hurtles towards a crash, most people are assuming that, in the end, European leaders will do whatever it takes to save the single currency. That is because the consequences of the euro’s destruction are so catastrophic that no sensible policymaker could stand by and let it happen.

A euro break-up would cause a global bust worse even than the one in 2008-09. The world’s most financially integrated region would be ripped apart by defaults, bank failures and the imposition of capital controls (see article). The euro zone could shatter into different pieces, or a large block in the north and a fragmented south. Amid the recriminations and broken treaties after the failure of the European Union’s biggest economic project, wild currency swings between those in the core and those in the periphery would almost certainly bring the single market to a shuddering halt. The survival of the EU itself would be in doubt.

Mere HER i The Economist.

Sanity in Numbers

Tim Congdon – December 2011

Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, is reputed to be a sensible, level-headed lady. So when she claimed in the eurozone bail-out negotiations that their failure could threaten continued peace between Europe’s nations, the media latched on to her words. Could it really be true that, 66 years after a world war that had been calamitous for her country and its people, the leader of Germany was warning of a similar horror? Would that be the price to be paid by Europe’s citizens if their single currency area were to disintegrate?

A fair comment is that Merkel’s remarks caused bemusement to many not directly involved in the negotiations and able to maintain a degree of objectivity. The United Nations has 193 members, while the European Union has 27 and the eurozone 17. One hundred and seventy-six countries do not have the euro as their currency and 166 do not even belong to the EU.

Mere HER i Standpoint Magazine.

How Brussels Stifles Democracy in Europe

Daniel Hannan -December 2011

How could so many clever people get it so wrong? The flaws in the euro project are not just clear with hindsight; they were visible at the outset and were widely pointed out. It was never going to be possible to jam widely divergent economies into a single monetary policy. It was plainly reckless to invite Italy and Greece to join the new currency when their government debt was at twice the permitted level of 60 per cent of GDP. Plenty of doubters said so at the time. Yet, in every national parliament, in every central bank, in every university faculty, in every television editorial conference, there was a collective suspension of disbelief.

Why? What were they thinking? If you listen carefully to what Euro-integrationists were saying when the single currency was launched, you hear a subtext. It’s not so much that they liked the euro, it’s that they disliked the people who opposed it. Listen, for example to Charles Kennedy in 2002:

Mere HER i Standpoint Magazine.

Andre kilder: Standpoint Magazine, Standpoint Magazine, The Telegraph,

Video: Roger Scruton i Prag

Roger Scruton taler om byer og byplanlægning. Fra Prag den 10. – 12. oktober 2010:

14th FORUM 2000 Conference, Roger Scruton, The World We Live In

Speech by Roger Scruton during the panel “The World We Live In” on the 14th Forum 2000 Conference.

Paul Berman var øjenvidne til 11. september

Og Paul Berman skrev om det, han så. I dag ville Berman måske have formuleret sig lidt anderledes:

Do Ideas Matter?

From September 11 to the Arab Spring

August 24, 2011 | Paul Berman
I: My role on September 11 was to be a reporter for The New Republic. I was in downtown Brooklyn, and from my rooftop I watched the first tower crumble, and then I ran downstairs to the street with pen and notebook and plunged into the crowds fleeing over the bridges. I spoke with one person after another, asking what they had seen. They told me. I compiled my report. It ran a few days later in the issue dated September 24, 2001, with under the title “Under the Bridge: Brooklyn Dispatch.”

But what strikes me now, in glancing back at my little article, are a couple of non-reportorial ruminations that appear in the final paragraphs. These are comments on the philosopher Plotinus and his theory of evil, and on the poet Baudelaire and his theory of landscape. A lot of readers’ eyebrows must have arched. But I was trying to take in the event, and the ruminations pushed me to work up some thoughts. I went on scribbling notes, and a couple of weeks later I published the results in The American Prospect under the title “Terror and Liberalism,” illustrated with marvelous photographs of Italian fascists from Mussolini’s time, dressed in ridiculous uniforms, and other parading fantasists. Eventually I brought out a book under the same title, unfortunately without illustrations—my contribution, for better or for worse, to the literature of 9/11.

Mere HER i The New Republic.

Herligt initiativ

Det var da en glimrende ide – en alternativ Durban III-konferene. Bare de nu husker alle os andre og får talerne optaget og YouTubet. Det er særdeles fine folk, man kommer til at høre:

Wiesel arranging Durban III counter-conference

By Benjamin Weinthal – August 19, 2011

Durban conference legitimized hate speech on a global scale; it’s shocking Germany has not refused unequivocally to withdraw. 

Berlin – The third UN-sponsored anti-racisim conference, which plans to commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the 2001 anti-Israel Durban I event, will face a counter-conference in September featuring Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, seeking to debunk a Durban process which critics say is riddled with hatred and intolerance.

The Durban process, so named for the South African city where the first conference took place in 2001, is shrouded in controversy because the first conference singled out Israel for attacks in its political document.

Mere HER i The Jerusalem Post.

Opdatering – endnu en artikel om samme emne:

Ahmadinejad and New York Maid Service

Claudia Rosett – August 18, 2011

September brings the annual opening of the United Nations General Assembly, and sure as nukes are nukes, that means Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will again be coming to New York. UN sanctions on Iran notwithstanding, this will be Ahmadinejad’s seventh performance from the UN’s main podium — not counting his appearances in recent years at UN conclaves such as an FAO food summit in Rome, Durban II in Geneva, and last year’s “nonproliferation” conference in New York.

Mere HER hos Family Security Matters.

Hvorfor faldt Sovjet-blokken?

The Gorbachev Files – Secret Papers Reveal Truth Behind Soviet Collapse

By Christian Neef – August 11, 2011

Communist hardliners staged a coup against Mikhail Gorbachev 20 years ago, and the Soviet Union collapsed soon afterwards. Previously unknown documents, which SPIEGEL has obtained, show just how desperate the last Soviet leader was as he fought to retain power — and how he begged Germany for money to save his country.

There is one moment — a single decision — that some people still hold against Mikhail Gorbachev today, 20 years later.

Gorbachev, the last leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and last president of the Soviet Union, his wife and his closest confidants had survived the attempted coup by the KGB, the military leadership and the interior minister. They returned to Moscow from their house arrest at Gorbachev’s vacation home in the Crimean resort of Foros. Their plane landed in the capital at 2:15 a.m., local time, on August 22, 1991.

Mere HER i Der Spiegel. Jeg har valgt at linke til print-versionen for at undgå det der pjat med sideinddeling.

Opdatering: Foreign Magazine har en foto-serie fra perioden her.

Durban III braser sammen

Det må man da håbe:

Three countries pull out of Durban III. Where are others?

By Anne Bayefsky – July 24, 2011

The admirable decision by Czech Republic, Italy and the Netherlands not to participate in the upcoming UN “anti-racism” extravaganza should serve as a wake-up call for other democracies.

News broke Friday and Saturday that the Czech Republic, Italy and The Netherlands have decided to pull out of the upcoming UN “anti-racism” extravaganza known as Durban III. Canada, Israel, and the United States have already given thumbs down to the event, which the UN is bringing to US shores on September 22, 2011. While Americans will be mourning the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the United Nations in New York will be “commemorating” the 10th anniversary of the first Durban conference – an outpouring of the kind of intolerance and xenophobia which fuels terrorism in the first place.

Mere HER i The Jerusalem Post.

Opdatering 29. juli 2011 – Bayefsky har en opfølgning:

U.N. Busy Deciding How to Slam Israel

By Anne Bayefsky | July 28, 2011

Member states of the U.N. General Assembly are busy hammering out how to slam Israel and restrict human rights like free speech at “Durban III” – the racist “anti-racism” event to be held in New York on Sept. 22.

Mere HER hos FoxNews.

Andre kilder: The American Thinker, The Weekly Standard, Pajamas Media,

Om Rusland & Mikhail Gorbatjov

Lidt historie:

Everything You Think You Know About the Collapse of the Soviet Union is Wrong

By Leon Aron | July/August 2011 issue

Every revolution is a surprise. Still, the latest Russian Revolution must be counted among the greatest of surprises. In the years leading up to 1991, virtually no Western expert, scholar, official, or politician foresaw the impending collapse of the Soviet Union, and with it one-party dictatorship, the state-owned economy, and the Kremlin’s control over its domestic and Eastern European empires. Neither, with one exception, did Soviet dissidents nor, judging by their memoirs, future revolutionaries themselves. When Mikhail Gorbachev became general secretary of the Communist Party in March 1985, none of his contemporaries anticipated a revolutionary crisis. Although there were disagreements over the size and depth of the Soviet system’s problems, no one thought them to be life-threatening, at least not anytime soon.

Man sagde ellers, at russerne gav op overfor Vestens IT-revolution. At det især var udfordringen fra EDB, som det hed dengang. Det mangler i artiklen. Mere HER i Foreign Policy – kan også læses her hos AEI.

Meltdown

For the first time, Boris Yeltsin’s right-hand man tells the inside story of the coup that killed glasnost — and changed the world.

By Gennady Burbulis & Michele A. Berdy | July/August 2011

“That scum!” Boris Yeltsin fumed. “It’s a coup. We can’t let them get away with it.”

It was the morning of Aug. 19, 1991, and the Russian president was standing at the door of his dacha in Arkhangelskoe, a compound of small country houses outside Moscow where the top Russian government officials lived. I had raced over from my own house nearby, after a friend called from Moscow, frantic and nearly hysterical, insisting that I turn on the radio. There had been a coup; Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev had been removed from power.

Mere HER i Foreign Policy.

Foreign Policy har flere tema-artikler om Mikhail Gorbatjov og Rusland her.

Andre kilder: Wikipedia,

Bruce Thornton om bildungsfilistre

Corrupt Language Breeds Bad History and Bad Policy

Advancing a Free Society

by Bruce S. Thornton – May 24, 2011

As the history of communism and fascism both illustrate, modern political tyranny has relied on fabricated history to legitimize its claims and actions, and such history in turn relies on the debasement of language. Nowhere is this axiom more evident than in the conflict between Israel and the Arabs — so much so that, as Obama’s recent remarks about Israel show, the false history and its false vocabulary are now taken for reality and made the basis of policy.

Start with the use of “borders” to describe what is in fact the armistice line marking the farthest advance of the five Arab armies that invaded Israel in 1948. That line is not an international “border” in the strict sense of a line dividing one sovereign state from another. The territory in question was never a state. Once a state is established, then the international border will be settled by negotiations. As Israeli ambassador Dore Gold points out, UN resolution 242, as well as later agreements such as the 1993 Oslo Accords, preserves this “flexibility for creating new borders.”

Mere HER i Victor Davis Hanson’s Private Papers. Og en til:

The Teacher of Fools

Posted by Bruce Thornton on May 30th, 2011

In Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War, an Athenian ambassador refutes the Spartans’ claim that they are going to war with Athens on the principle of justice: “Calculations of interest have made you take up the cry of justice––a consideration which no one ever yet brought forward to hinder his ambition when he had a chance of gaining anything by might.” Thucydides presents here a permanent truth of interstate conflict: when force will not get a people what they want, they will often cloak their ambitions in lofty principles like justice in order to gain sympathy, buy time, and win allies.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Melanie Phillips om Bin Laden

This hand-wringing over Bin Laden is not just distasteful – it’s potentially suicidal

By Melanie Phillips on 9th May 2011

Given some reactions to the killing of Osama Bin Laden, you really do have to wonder whether, if Britain were fighting World War II today, Hitler would have won. 

Just consider for a moment an instructive comparison. Reinhard Heydrich was one of the key architects of Hitler’s genocide against the Jews.

In 1941, the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) was authorised by Winston Churchill to assassinate high-ranking Nazis wherever they could be found.

Mere HER i The Daily Mail.

Video: Niall Fergusons nye serie fra Channel 4

Denne store, flotte serie om Den Vestlige Civilisation blev sendt på Channel 4 i marts og april i år. I følge Niall Ferguson kan Vestens succes især tilskrives: konkurrence, forskning, demokrati, lægevidenskab, forbrugerisme, protestantisme:

Civilization: Is the West History – Pt1. (Competition)

“The first programme in the series begins in 1420 when Ming China had a credible claim to be the most advanced civilization in the world: ‘All Under Heaven’. England on the eve of the Wars of the Roses would have seemed quite primitive by contrast.

Yet the lead that China had established in technology was not to be translated into sustained economic growth. In China a monolithic empire stifled colonial expansion and economic innovation. In Europe political division bred competition.

The question for our own time is whether or not we have lost that competitive edge to a rapidly ascending Asia”

1. Competition: a decentralisation of political and economic life, which created the launch pad for both nation states and capitalism.

Fred, Tyrkiet, Israel, Palæstina…

Der bliver igen fred:

The so-called Peace Process has dramatically undermined Israel’s viability as a state in perception and reality

How Israel’s Peacemaking Endangers Itself and the Stability of the Region

Daniel Greenfield – March 10, 2011

When Israeli leaders embarked on peace negotiations with the Islamic-Marxist terrorists who called themselves representatives of the ““Palestinian people”, they hoped to improve relations with the Muslim world. But not only did Israel not succeed in improving relations with the Muslim world, but its bid for peace has actually destroyed its old relationships which were built on a certain respect for Israel’s staying power.

The more Israel has traded land for peace, the more its staying power has diminished. There is no better place to see that shift than in Turkey, formerly Israel’s closest ally in the Muslim world.

Mere HER i Canada Free Press eller her hos Sultan Knish.

David Cameron siger ét og gør noget andet

Multikultur fungerer ikke, siger manden og lukker et rekord stort antal indvandrere ind i landet. Forræderiet startede under Labour og vil blive Tony Blairs eftermæle. Han ødelagde England:

Record rise in immigration as 240,000 given right to stay in just one year

By Jack Doyle on 25th February 2011

Labour’s ‘shambolic’ stewardship of the immigration system was exposed last night by figures showing that almost a quarter of a million migrants were handed the right to stay in Britain last year.

Grants of settlement, which are one step short of a passport, rose 35 per cent to 238,950 in the year to September 2010 – the highest since records began in 1960.

Mere HER i The Daily Mail. Englænderne har aldrig villet have alle de fremmede ind i landet:

How Labour let in 3 million immigrants, in defiance of the overwhelming wishes of the British people

By Sir Andrew Green on 22nd February 2011

Official figures to be published on Thursday will confirm that foreign immigration under Labour added more than three million to our population.

At the same time nearly one million British citizens voted with their feet, some saying that they were leaving because England was no longer a country that they recognised.

How could all this have happened in the teeth of public opposition? Even the Labour government’s own survey last February showed that 77 per cent of the public wanted immigration reduced, including 54 per cent of the ethnic communities, while 50 per cent of the public wanted it reduced ‘by a lot’.

Mere HER i The Daily Mail. The Daily Mail har mere om sagen – mere end 80 pct. af indvandrerne kommer fra lande udenfor EU-området:

How three million migrants came to UK under Labour in biggest population growth since Saxon times (… that’s nearly one every minute)

By James Slack on 22nd February 2011

Labour’s open-door immigration policy led to the largest population explosion since the Saxon invasion more than 1,000 years ago.

An audit of official figures last night revealed that during the party’s 13 years in power Britain’s foreign-born population increased by three million.

At the same time, nearly a million British citizens left the country.

Mere HER i The Daily Mail.

Multiculturalism In Retreat

by Herbert I. London – February 24, 2011

At long last a European politician, Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron, lifted the curtain on the pernicious dimensions of multiculturalism. After several decades of home grown terrorism and an acceptance of separation by Muslim groups in the United Kingdom, the prime minister said, “Enough.”

A new course will be charted that moves from accommodation to integration. There may be a risk of xenophobia with the Cameron approach, but it is a worthwhile trade-off if terrorist impulses are thwarted.

Mr. Cameron called his strategy “muscular liberalism”: confronting extremist Islamic thought, and challenging those efforts that attempt to undermine Western values. The prime minister made special mention, for example, of zero tolerance for the subjugation of women, a practice permitted because of Islamic separation and application of Sharia Law.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.

Opdatering den 27.  februar 2011 fra The Daily Mail, der refererer en ny meningsmåling:

Almost half the country would back a far-Right party if they gave up violence, an astonishing new poll revealed today.

A total of 48 per cent said that they would support a group that vowed to crack down on immigration and Islamic extremists.

They would also restrict the building of mosques and order the flag of St George or the Union Jack be flown on all public buildings.

Opdatering 28. februar 2011 fra The Daily Mail, der skriver, at indvandrerne også er imod indvandring:

Asians more likely to be anti-immigration than white Britons

More Asians are now opposed to immigration than white Britons, according to a new poll which reveals that opposition to new arrivals now transcends race.

Research commissioned by the Searchlight Educational Trust found that 39 per cent of Asians, 34 per cent of whites and 21 per cent of blacks believed immigration should be halted either permanently or at least until the UK’s economy was back on track.

Andre kilder: The Telegraph,

Durban III truer forude

U.N. Pours Salt in America’s Wounds

By Anne Bayefsky – November 24, 2010

Just when we were beginning to get into the holiday spirit, the United Nations decided that Durban III is coming to town.

Late yesterday, the UN General Assembly’s Third Committee adopted a resolution which launches another global “anti-racism” hatefest. It is intended to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the debacle held in Durban, South Africa in 2001. But this time, the UN has outdone itself: the celebration of a notorious prescription for intolerance, closely linked to Islamic extremism, is now scheduled for New York City just days after the 10th anniversary of 9/11.

Like the Ground Zero mosque architects, the UN has decided to pour salt in the wounds of still grieving Americans. The crowds at Durban I held high their signs reading: “For the liberation of Quds, machine-guns based upon faith and Islam must be used,” and “The martyr’s blood irrigates the tree of revolution in Palestine.” The obvious connection between hate and terror, or incitement to violence and violence itself, is either irrelevant to the UN or part of the plan.

Mere i FoxNews HER.

Audio: Roger Scruton i Tjekkiet

Roger Scruton fortæller om det undergrundsarbejde, han var involveret i før murens fald. Styret i det daværende Tjekkoslovakiet arresterede Scruton og smed ham ud af landet. Vi hører også om tiden efter murens fald og delingen af landet. Fra 31. oktober 2010 – man kan følge med i en komplet udskrift fra Radio Prague her:

Roger Scruton and a special relationship
 
31-10-2010 By David Vaughan

One of the most prominent guests at the Forum 2000 conference in Prague earlier this month was the conservative English philosopher and writer Roger Scruton. In the Czech Republic he is well known not just for his extensive writings on the history of modern philosophy, but also for close links he forged with Czechoslovakia in the years before the fall of communism. In this week’s Czech Books, Roger Scruton talks to David Vaughan about how his special relationship to this country has developed over the years.

Programmet startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varighed knap 17 minutter.

Norman Berdichevsky om McCarthyisme

En lidt anderledes artikel om et emne, vi ikke har haft ret meget om her på bloggen:

Religious Left, Social justice, Reds in Our Churches

The Strange Case of J.B. Matthews, the Religious Left and the Censure of Senator McCarthy

By Dr. Norman Berdichevsky  – September 22, 2010

While the term “Religious Right” is one of the most frequently used terms in the political lexicon, notably since the rise of what is usually referred to as the Evangelical Churches, the Political Left is alive and well and a strong crutch for the Democratic Party calling for “social justice”. During the first term of the Eisenhower administration, the role of American churches in politics became a major issue and helped precipitate the campaign to defame and censure Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin.

 Mere HER hos Canada Free Press.

Israel og den arabiske propaganda

Historisk baggrund for Israels problemer gennem mange år:

Israel’s Allies in 1948; The USSR, Czechoslovakia, American Mainline Churches and the Left

By Dr. Norman Berdichevsky

The nearly universal belief, never challenged by the media, is that the United States was wholly or largely and “morally” responsible for fully supporting Israel on the ground from the very beginning of its independence in May, 1948. The world has been inundated with a tsunami of Arab propaganda and crocodile tears shed for the “Palestinians” who have reveled in what they refer to as their Catastrophe or Holocaust (“Nabka” in Arabic).

Their plight has been accompanied by unremitting criticism that the United States was the principal architect that stood behind Israel from the very beginning with money, manpower and arms. The fact is that President Truman eventually decided against the pro-Arab “professional opinion” of his Secretary of State, General George Marshall and the Arabists of the State Department. He accorded diplomatic recognition to the new Jewish state but never considered active military aid. His own memoirs recall how he felt betrayed by State Department officials and the American U.N. Ambassador, Warren Austin who pulled the rug out from under him one day after he promised Zionist leader Chaim Weitzman support for partition.

Meget mere HER i Canada Free Press.

Video: Václav Klaus om EU

The world with Czech Republic president Václav Klaus – Taped on November 06, 2009:  

In retelling his experience of living through the Velvet Revolution, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the lifting of the Iron Curtain, Czech Republic president Václav Klaus offers his views on what students today need to understand about life under communism. 

Demokratiets dage er talte?

Is the age of democracy over?

By Francis Fukuyama – February 10, 2010

Twenty years ago, Francis Fukuyama forecast the final triumph of liberal democracy and the ‘end of history’. As pro-democracy movements falter from Ukraine to China, he revisits his thesis — and asks if history has a few more surprises to spring

It looked like a revolution in reverse. The announced victory of Viktor Yanukovich in Sunday’s Ukrainian presidential election undid that country’s Orange Revolution of 2004 by returning to power the very man whom tens of thousands of pro-democracy protesters came out to defeat. And this is only the latest in a series of apparent setbacks for democracy in recent years. Over the last decade we have seen the collapse or discrediting of not just the ‘Orange’ movement, but many of the other so-called ‘rainbow revolutions’ across eastern Europe: the ‘Rose’ revolution in Georgia, the ‘Cedar’ revolution in Lebanon. Then there’s Vladimir Putin’s transformation of Russia into an ‘electoral authoritarian’ state, the undermining of democratic institutions by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and the rise of China as a successful authoritarian moderniser.

 Mere i The Spectator HER.

Tjekkiet: mur rundt om sigøjnere

Romaer – eller sigøjnere – er upopulære i Tjekkiet, hvor de i vide kredse betragtes som landets nye underklasse. Tjekkerne betragter dem som støjende analfabeter, der hærger, stjæler med arme og ben, nasser på de offentlige kasser og får alt for mange beskidte børn.

Romaerne mener ikke, de selv er skyld i, at de stjæler og begår hærværk:

Romaerne mener på den anden side, at samfundet aldrig giver dem en chance, men dyrker diskrimination og racisme mod dem. Billedet gør sig gældende i andre lande i Øst- og Centraleuropa, hvor halvdelen af Europas ca. 10 mio. romaer bor.

Integration virker aldrig nogensteder. For roma-folkets vedkommende er det slået fejl i samtlige jordens lande i hundredvis af år. Men prøv at forklare en politiker det. Nu vil man i Tjekkiet opføre en mur for blive fri for at omgås dem, skriver Jyllands-Posten:

De problematiske familier ødelægger alt, hvad de får øje på, på fællesarealerne. De er aggressive, ødelægger vinduer, smadrer bilruder og antenner, deres børn hopper på bilerne og smider med sten,” siger en talsmand for de vrede beboere

Måske burde man arbejde på at give romaerne deres eget land i stedet. De kom oprindelig fra det nordlige Indien for mere end 1.000 år siden, skriver Wikipedia. De blev fordrevet af muslimer.

Jeg tror ikke, det er realistisk at finde et område dér, som de kunne få lov til at overtage. Det bliver nok i det hele taget svært at finde et landområde, som nogen vil afstå til dem. De vil ikke have romaer som naboer.

Men man kunne inddæmme nye landområder. Hollænderne har f.eks. inddæmmet enorme arealer. Selvom mange ville sige, at det er racistisk at lave en ø-stat, er det nok det mest realistiske. Den skal selvfølgelig være betydeligt større end vores hjemlige Peberholm, men det kan godt lade sig gøre.

Efter 1.000 år er det på tide at tilbyde det upopulære folkeslag en løsning. EU har råd til at bygge en ø i internationalt farvand til dem, hvis de vil tage imod det. Efter alle disse år har de stadig deres egen konge, deres eget sprog og deres eget flag.