The British Freedom Party har lavet en ny video om sit partiprogram – 20 punkter (den næstsidste video er den bedste):
Paul Weston June 12 2012 20 point agenda
EDL / British Freedom Press Conference
Tommy Robinson, Kevin Carroll and Paul Weston announce the appointment of the joint leaders of the English Defence League as joint Vice Chairmen of the British Freedom Party in Luton on Saturday 5th May 2012.
British Freedom Party Chairman – Paul Weston – IFPS Dinner Speech – Toronto – Feb 19, 2012
Paul Weston, Chairman of the British Freedom Party speaks to the International Free Press Society – Canada in Toronto on February 19, 2012.
Mr. Weston warns Canada of the encroachment of Islam in society using the British example where that society has seen the establishment of Sharia courts and a hands-off approach be law enforcement. He foresees a coming civil war in the United Kingdom between Muslims and those Britons who hold traditional British views of liberalism, individual rights and freedom.
Robert Vaughan interviewer:
British Freedom Party Chairman – Paul Weston on Just Right Feb 19 2012 Toronto
Og endnu et interview om England og partiet:
A Future for Britain Free from Islamization: An Interview with British Freedom Party Chairman, Paul Weston
24 March 2012 – Jerry Gordon
The United Kingdom, or as Daily Mail pundit, Melanie Phillips calls it, Londonistan, has been mired in massive demographic change and concomitant Islamization brought on by its recent “open door” immigration policy. This was graphically evident in the July 7, 2005 London underground and bus system attack by four British Muslim suicide bombers who took the lives of more than 52 innocent victims and injured over 700. It was also reflected in the condoning of the more than 85 Shariah courts by the UK legal system and controversial Church of England head, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams. Deeply disturbing has been the de facto creation of what former Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali called “no-go areas” where native Britons are not welcome, especially if they happen to be homosexual or Jewish.
Mere HER i The New English Review eller her hos Right Side News.
The un-burka-able Brooke Goldstein joins Michael Coren to discuss lawfare, the use of Western laws and international institutions by islamofascists to suppress criticism of islam.
Jonathan Halevi Joins Ezra Levant to discuss islam’s global design: the conquests of Jerusalem, Constantinople, Rome (read up on the Leonine Wall, Ezra), France, Spain, and everywhere else in dar al-Harb.
David Menzies on the dangers of islam
David Menzies visits with a Toronto man who actively protests about the evils of islam.
Christopher Caldwell anmelder to bøger. Dels “Europe’s Angry Muslims: The Revolt of the Second Generation” af Robert S. Leiken og dels “After the Fall: The End of the European Dream and the Decline of a Continent” af Walter Laqueur:
Europe’s Other Crisis
May 4, 2012 | Christopher Caldwell
In two separate incidents in March, Mohammed Merah, a French-born French citizen who thought he was waging jihad, ambushed four soldiers around Toulouse, killing three of them. A week later, he shot dead three children arriving for morning classes at a nearby Jewish school, along with a young rabbi who was father to two of them. The children were aged eight, six, and three. Merah recorded the killings on a micro-camera mounted around his neck and sent the footage to Al Jazeera, which did not air it. Shortly before he died by gunfire, Merah told the soldiers who had surrounded his apartment that he regretted not having done more of what he did.
These were crazy deeds, and one can argue about what role insanity played in them, but something else needs to be candidly acknowledged: the killer was not a lone wolf. He had a measure of community support and a great deal of family support. His brother Abdelkader professed himself “proud” of his relation to the murderer. His mother refused to convince her son to surrender to police. His father threatened to file a wrongful-death suit against the French state. The contemporary culture of politicized Islam, as deracinated Internet-surfers understand it, is what Merah believed he was fighting for. He was upset about French laws that limit the wearing of the Muslim veil among schoolgirls. Someone had whipped him into a frenzy over Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.
Mere HER hos The New Republic. OBS: Jeg har valgt at linke til printversionen for at undgå den fjantede sideinddeling, som er her.
François Hollande er Frankrigs nye præsident. Nicolas Sarkozy har tabt. Artiklen herunder er skrevet før valget, – på trods af datoen:
The Lady with the Popular Front
France’s rightists have grown too big to ignore.
May 7, 2012 • By Christopher Caldwell
The French prefer “tenacity” to “cooperation” by a measure of 51-44 percent, according to a poll about political attitudes published this election season. By 57-41 percent they like “hard work and courage” better than “social justice and solidarity.” Such attitudes have not been widespread in France since the war. On Friday, Dominique de Villepin, the foreign minister who led France out of the Iraq war coalition in 2003, professed himself “frightened” of France’s right-wingers. As Attorney General John Mitchell said of the United States in 1970, “This country’s going so far to the right you’re not even going to recognize it.”
Sultan Knish (Daniel Greenfield) paints Israel in 50 years
We read the headlines and each day brings the news that Israel appears to be standing over an abyss, between terrorism, nuclear weapons, international delegitimization, social problems and a host of other challenges, it’s not unreasonable to wonder whether Israel will survive.
But to look back at Israel’s history is to recognize that its situation has always been precarious, that it has always faced existential challenges that seemed on the verge of tearing it apart.
Israel has faced destruction time and time again, and while today’s threats are of a different character than in the past, they are a continuation of a small country’s long struggle against the historical imperatives of the West and the East.
Israel exists in defiance of history. In defiance of Longfellow’s exclamation in The Jewish Cemetery at Newport that, “What once has been shall be no more”. It is predictably unpredictable. There is no one set future for the Jewish state, only many possible futures.
On March 20, 2012, Daniel Greenfield, the inimitable blogger Sultan Knish – explored these possible futures, both the good and the bad, in relation to the trends in Israel and the world. Through these possible futures we began to see whether the Jewish state will be able to defy the prediction in Longfellow’s poem or whether it will once again become a Jewish cemetery.
Mange islamkritikere har ikke flere illusioner tilbage, – der er ikke nogen her i hvert fald. Geller er fantastisk i denne video. Fra 22. marts 2012:
Pamela Geller
3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour
Robert Spencer
3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour
Fra KHOW Radios The Caplis & Silverman Show. Fra 22. marts 2012:
If you missed Caplis and Silverman three o’clock hour yesterday, you missed a lot! But worry not, it is the featured podcast at www.khow.com. BTW, when Spencer and Geller were asked about military action against Iran’s nuclear program, they both said yes. When asked when it should occur, both said, “YESTERDAY!”
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 38½ minutter.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch is in studio with Peter for the Full hour. Peter and Robert discuss the history of Islam and the vast differences between Islamic and western culture and philosophy. Robert Spencer and Peter discuss Jihad in Europe, Jefferson and the Jihadist, Bush and Obama and western governments misunderstanding of Islamic law and culture, slavery and Islam and Arab Muslims slaughtering black Africans and more.
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 33½ minut.
Time to Get Out of Afghanistan
March 19, 2012 – By Robert Spencer
The Afghan mission is imploding, and the Obama administration is covering for Islamic jihadists. Last week, Marine officials revealed that a Marine killed on February 1 in what the Pentagon called “combat operations” at the time was actually murdered by a jihadist in the Afghan army. The cover-up of this latest jihad attack from a supposed ally is emblematic of a failed mission. It is long past time to end the mission in Afghanistan.
Hamid Karzai has said that he wants Afghan forces to take control of the nation’s security in 2013, not 2014 as American officials are planning. Karzai is a scoundrel, but he is right about this, albeit for the wrong reasons. This mission is foredoomed. There is no clearly defined goal, and in any case, any goal worth reaching is impossible to achieve. There is no bringing democracy or humane values to a sharia state, and in any case, we already gave the Karzai regime a sharia constitution, so we aren’t really even trying to do anything effective for women or non-Muslims or the freedom of speech or the freedom of conscience. We’re fighting against an enemy that the vice president of the United States says is not an enemy, and that our client president of Afghanistan threatens to join. How long is this madness going to continue?
Egypt Designates Israel Its Top Enemy — Obama Restores Military Aid
by Robert Spencer on Mar 21st, 2012
Egypt’s parliament, which is dominated by two pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist groups, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists, voted unanimously last Monday to expel Israel’s ambassador to Egypt, and signaled that the Camp David Accords would soon be a thing of the past: Egypt, the parliamentarians declared, would “never” be Israel’s ally. In fact, Israel was Egypt’s “number one enemy.” And how did Barack Obama respond to this egregious trampling upon the agreement that has kept an uneasy peace between Israel and Egypt for thirty years? By announcing a resumption of military aid to Egypt.
From the beginning of the “Arab Spring,” I said repeatedly that it was not a democracy movement, as the Western press was claiming, but an Islamic supremacist takeover that would result in the creation of Sharia states that would be far more hostile to the U.S. and Israel than the Arab nationalist regimes they were supplanting. This assessment was greeted with the usual scorn: the Islamic supremacist media machine charged “Islamophobia,” on Fox Juan Williams said I was “fearmongering,” and the usual suspects made the usual ad hominem attacks. Yet everything that has happened since then has shown that the “Arab Spring” is indeed an Islamic supremacist winter, ushering in repressive Sharia regimes with the enthusiastic blessing of Barack Obama.
They hate us because we’re pigs. No, not the apes and pigs into which Allah transforms the Sabbath-breaking Jews in the Qur’an (2:62-66; 5:59-60; 7:166), but pigs as in…dogs. Wolves. Immoral, lecherous, lustful, fornicating creeps. Western immorality is a frequent feature of the Islamic critique of the contemporary West, as well as a target for the morality police of Sharia states. In the summer of 2009 Iranian authorities even published a list of hairstyles that were acceptably moral and Islamic, as opposed to “decadent” Western imports, among which were the ponytail and the mullet.
That same Western decadence is also a frequent preoccupation of Islamic jihadists. In December 2010, a Muslim named Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly set off explosives on a street in Stockholm that was crowded with Christmas shoppers, killing himself and injuring two others. His wife, who was herself later arrested for helping plan the attack, explained that Abdulwahab “disliked the decadent side of society here.”
Even some non-Muslim writers echo this critique. Dinesh D’Souza argued in his 2007 farrago The Enemy At Home that Islamic jihadists were largely motivated by rage at the West’s “social and moral corruption,” and asserted that “the Muslims who hate us the most are the ones who have encountered Western decadence, either in the West or in their own countries.”
Han skulle have været henrettet i stedet for Hvidsten Gruppen
09. marts 2012 – interview af Katrine Winkel Holm
Modstandsmanden Jørgen Kieler overvejede at sende sin Ebbe Munck pris tilbage, da Tøger Seidenfaden fik den. Læs interviewet med modstandsmanden, der sad i Vestre Fængsel med Hvidsten Gruppen.
Den nye censur – Ole Hasselbalch svarer sine kritikere
11. marts 2012 – interview af Lars Hedegaard
Aviskampagnen mod den private forening ORG bygger på løgn og opspind og er udtryk for det rene bølleuvæsen, mener professor Ole Hasselbalch. Han har aldeles ikke tænkt sig at lægge bånd på den vrede, som flere anmeldere af hans netop udkomne bog om “Politiken-affæren” har kritiseret ham for. Et af ofrene for smudskampagnen har opnået erstatning.
Han er på al-Qaedas dødsliste, og i haven sidder efterretningstjenesten og passer på ham døgnet rundt. Alligevel tager den svenske Muhammed-tegner Lars Vilks sin skæbne med ophøjet ro. Sappho har besøgt manden, der nægtede at gå under jorden.
Det er fantastisk, at Vesten har fået Sun News Tv. Bare det nu bliver ved. Alle fra 31. januar 2012:
Ezra Levant: Keep Omar Khadr in Guantanamo
Michael Coren: islam: a religion gone mad, a religion gone bad
“The muslims themselves are colonizers, having pushed most Christians out of the Middle East, and the Ottoman Turks – muslims all – colonized the region for centuries. Arabs colonized Persians, Assyrians, Kurds, and many others.”
- Michael Coren
Michael Coren & Robert Spencer: islam & honour killing
The great pair discuss the plague of honour killing within islam.
“In this study, worldwide, 91 percent of perpetrators were Muslims. In North America, most killers (84 percent) were Muslims, with only a few Sikhs and even fewer Hindus perpetrating honor killings; in Europe, Muslims comprised an even larger majority at 96 percent while Sikhs were a tiny percentage. In Muslim countries, obviously almost all the perpetrators were Muslims. With only two exceptions, the victims were all members of the same religious group as their murderers.”
- Worldwide Trends in Honor Killings, 2010
Og en artikel af Spencer:
New York officials apologize for telling the truth
by Robert Spencer – January 31, 2012
The mainstream media, led by the New York Times, and the Islamic supremacist Hamas-linked hate group the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) are doing all they can to whip up a frenzy about the NYPD’s showing of a relatively tepid but accurate counter-terror film, The Third Jihad, to police officers.
Lost in the hysteria is the question of whether there is anything inaccurate or false in the film – yet those who are demanding apologies and reeducation from the NYPD have demonstrated not one inaccuracy in it. No one who is protesting against this film is going beyond the claim that it is “Islamophobic.”
Apparently the Taliban are softening, even allowing girls to get an education. Clearly this heralds an opening to the West, a heady indication that their most repressive days are past them, and that soon they will take their place among the free people of the earth. Soon they will be following the teachings of Naomi Wolf and Thomas Paine.
Yaroslav Trofimov, in a piece that ran Sunday in the Wall Street Journal, noted that Maulvi Qalamuddin, who headed the Committee to Protect Virtue and Prevent Vice back when the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, has completely changed his tune regarding the education of girls. Where once he oversaw the shutting-down, sometimes violently, of girls’ schools, now he says: “Education for women is just as necessary as education for men. In Islam, men and women have the same duty to pray, to fast–and to seek learning.”
Anyone who believes this, or believes that Maulvi Qalamuddin believes it, should contact me, as I have a lovely bridge to sell you. “War is deceit,” said Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, according to a famous hadith, and the Taliban are listening. But the Taliban are to be forgiven for thinking that this sort of thing would play well in Washington, for it very likely will. After all, Joe Biden is still the Vice President — the amiable dunce who recently said: “Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That’s critical. There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy because it threatens U.S. interests. If, in fact, the Taliban is able to collapse the existing government, which is cooperating with us in keeping the bad guys from being able to do damage to us, then that becomes a problem for us.”
De er bare herlige, de tre herrer her - FrontPageMagazine skriver om denne audio, der er dukket op på BlogTalkRadio i dag:
Opdatering – nu også som video:
“The Great Debate: David Goldman vs. Robert Spencer” on The Jamie Glazov Show
The Great Debate: David Goldman vs. Robert Spencer — on The Jamie Glazov Show
Two titans will go toe-to-toe:
David P. Goldman, the author of the new book, How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too). After 9/11, he began writing weekly essays at Asia Times Online under the byline “Spengler.” After joining the masthead of First Things magazine early in 2009, he revealed his identity and devoted himself to writing, mainly on politics and strategy, but also publishing essays on religion, classical music, literature and mathematics.
and
Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery).
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varighed 1 time.
Desuden 2 artikler af David P. Goldman – alias Spengler. Veritas Universalis har tidligere haft et uddrag af Goldmans nye bog, men det var meget lille sammenlignet med dette:
The fifth horseman of the apocalypse
By Spengler – Dec 13, 2011
(The essay below appears as a preface to my book How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too). [1]
Population decline is the elephant in the world’s living room. As a matter of arithmetic, we know that the social life of most developed countries will break down within two generations. Two out of three Italians and three of four Japanese will be elderly dependents by 2050. [1] If present fertility rates hold, the number of Germans will fall by 98% over the next two centuries. No pension and health care system can support such an inverted population pyramid. Nor is the problem limited to the industrial nations. Fertility is falling at even faster rates – indeed, at rates never before registered anywhere – in the Muslim world. The
world’s population will fall by as much as a fifth between the middle and the end of the 21st century, by far the worst decline in human history.
Mere HER i Asia Times. Kan også læses her hos ICJS.
Corruption and Islamism in Egypt
December 2, 2011 – by David P. Goldman
Egypt under Mubarak was a tightly-controlled kleptocracy, and Egypt since Mubarak has been an uncontrolled kleptocracy, in which public officials steal whatever isn’t tied down. Shiploads of rice, diesel fuel, and other tradables are leaving Egyptian ports for hard-currency markets, while the country–which imports half its caloric consumption–runs out of money. Mubarak’s elite has helicopters revving on their roofs. It’s no surprise Islamists swept this week’s parliamentary elections. Whom do we expect Egyptians to vote for?
Mere HER hos Pajamas Media. Kan også læses her hos ICJS.
Man kan høre mere Goldman og Glazov her hos Veritas Universalis:
Islam er nihilistisk og dens moral vendt på hovedet. Derfor falder den helt uden for det, vi normalt forbinder med religion, skriver redaktøren for The New English Review, Rebecca Bynum.
Muslimer angriber Hare Krishna-tempel med sten og baseball køller
17. december 2011 – artikel af Nicolai Sennels
Kl. 20.45 – altså i ly af mørket – den 6. december blev Hare Krishna-templet i Vanløse angrebet af unge muslimer. De startede med stenkast, og forsøgte senere, bevæbnet med køller, at bryde ind i til beboerne.
Topics: intolerant bigoted fascist Michael Erickson – Iran attacking the British embassy – honour killings – islam in the West – the “hate crime” charges – “human right” commissions – the death of America – Mark’s Christmas CD – show tunes
Jeg har valgt lidt ud fra november måneds Greenfield-produktion:
The roots of slavery can be found in the Muslim slave trade
Islam, the Religion of Slavery
Daniel Greenfield – November 10, 2011
The slow collapse of Dubai, a desert mirage built on oil money, human misery and the greed of Western businesses, reminds us once again of the fate of all slave economies in the end. But for all the skyscrapers in Dubai, the glittering avenues built by slave labor and the abundance of luxury American and European automobiles—the story of Dubai and Saudi Arabia is very much an old story in a Muslim Middle East, of fat prosperous sheiks clutching their ill gotten gains to themselves and ruling over harems and companies of slaves, until the end comes.
Like Muslim Brotherhood derived terrorists using the latest Web 2.0 social media as part of a quest to drive humanity back into the dark ages, the Gulf States are a very old story with the external gilt and glitz of modernity. While the Muslim world may employ the tools and utilities of the 21st century, even mimic its terminology, it has never left its own dark ages… and its dominant religious and social movements are all geared toward making sure that it never does.
Mere HER i Canada Free Press. Sultan Knish har den her.
The fanatics want armageddon, the clerics want a big gun that they can use to become a world power and the people doing the killing– it’s anyone’s guess what they want
Don’t Underestimate Iran’s Instability
Daniel Greenfield – November 17, 2011
Israeli leaders and generals certainly don’t mind smiling knowingly every time a top Iranian commander meets an untimely accident, which has been happening surprisingly often these past few years, but the explanation is likely to be more complicated than Mossad secrets agents operating behind the scenes. The logistics of infiltrating people on the ground to carry out assassinations isn’t easy, anyone viewing the chronology of the Dubai hit for one man in a hotel room, can only begin to imagine what it would take to pull off more complicated operations in Iran, which sees far less foreign travelers and has much tighter security.
There’s no doubt that Israel has its hand in it, but it’s also unwise to underestimate the meltdown of the Iranian revolution which began with Ahmadinejad’s fraudulent reelection and has turned into a complex power struggle between the Ayatollahs, Ahmadinejad and a populist movement that draws on student protests and brings together reformist Mullahs, Communists and masses of young people who want to live their lives without the religious police looking over their shoulders.
Mere HER hos Canada Free Press. Kan også læses her hos Sultan Knish.
Perpetuate a myth of Islamic innocence
The Dangers of Legitimizing Muslim Grievances
Daniel Greenfield – November 14, 2011
There is no surer path to Muslim violence than through the legitimization of Muslim grievance. And once you accept the legitimacy of the grievance, then you are also bound to accept the legitimacy of the violence that follows.
Violence begins with grievance. Grievance is the pretext for violence and the narrative for the violence. Liberals make a fetish of separating the grievance from the violence, emphasizing constructive means of resolving the grievance. But what do you do when the grievance and the violence are inseparable?
Rebuilding the Library of Alexandria some 1300 hundred years after its final destruction at the hands of its Islamic conquerors in a country where blasphemy against Islam is still a crime was always a fool’s errand. But it was a fool’s errand lavishly embraced by every collection of useful idiots from UNESCO to the National Library of France, which kicked in half a million books.
Most of the money was spent constructing a massive edifice housing only a fraction of the books that could be found in the Harvard University Library, the Library of Congress or the British Library– in a country with a lower literacy rate than much of the African continent. The Library was a Mubarak project and as the wonderful Arab Spring turns into the Islamic Winter, the mobs of Tahrir are coming for the library.
Once upon a time when newspaper and magazine offices were torched for offending a powerful group, the rest of the press would rally behind them. But when Charlie Hedbo, a French satirical magazine decided to put out an issue dedicated to Islam with a cover of Mohammed declaring, “100 lashes if you don’t die laughing,” and received a very special burning “Letter to the Editor” from the country’s “Religion of Peace,” the American press lined up behind the firebombers.
Christopher Dickey, the Paris Bureau editor at Newsweek suggested that the far right was probably behind it because it had the most to gain from the attack. Dickey was unable to accuse Hedbo, a left-wing magazine, of being a member of the far-right, so he did the next best thing by diverting attention from the perpetrators and transforming Muslims into the victims of a far-right conspiracy.
Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. Right Side News her.
“If Israel fails in the Middle East, I tell people here in the West that the Western civilization will fail.”
Mosab Hassan Yousef was born in Ramallah, in the West Bank in 1978.
His father, Sheikh Hassan Yousef, is a founding leader of Hamas, internationally recognized as a terrorist organization and responsible for countless suicide bombings and other deadly attacks against Israel.
Yousef was an integral part of the movement, for which he was imprisoned several times by the Shin Bet, the Israeli intelligence service. He withstood torture in prison only to discover Hamas was torturing its own people in a relentless search for collaborators. He began to question who his enemies really were— Israel? Hamas? America? After a chance encounter with a British tourist, Yousef started a six-year quest that jeopardized Hamas, endangered his family and threatened his life.
He has since embraced the Christian faith and sought political asylum in America.
Tidligere blogget om Sheikh Hassan Yousef, hvis holdninger er lidt omdiskuterede. Der er rejst tvivl om, hvor pro-vestlig og pro-israelsk manden egentlig er:
Frontpage Interview’s guest today is David P. Goldman, the author of the new book, How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too), which Regnery brought out this fall. After 9/11, Goldman began writing weekly essays at Asia Times Online under the byline “Spengler.” At the time he directed a research group at Credit Suisse, and afterward ran fixed income research for Bank of America. After joining the masthead of First Things magazine early in 2009, he revealed his identity and devoted himself to writing, mainly on politics and strategy, but also publishing essays on religion, classical music, literature and mathematics. He left First Things early in 2011 to write his book.
FP: David P. Goldman, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
Let’s begin with what inspired you to write this book.
Goldman: Thanks Jamie.
It was 9/11 and the aftermath. I’m an old Cold Warrior; I consulted for Norman A. Bailey, the head of planning at NSC in the first Reagan administration. We were playing a deadly global chess game with a fairly rational opponent; when the Russians knew they were beaten, they caved.
Det går rigtig godt med at få kristne udryddet i Nigeria. Det vil utvivlsomt glæde enhver Davos-mand og enhver halalhippie. Boko Haram hedder de lokale islamisters organisation. Det betyder “vestlig uddannelse er en synd”.
Boko Haram er en nær allieret af Al Qaeda, som også huserer i området. CNN kalder Boko Haram for Nigerias Taliban. Men det er vel et fedt? Amerikanere opfordres til at forlade landet.
Det er naturligvis sharialov, der kæmpes for. Metoden er sædvanlig jihad, så som terror, bilbomber, selvmordsbomber, mord, ildspåsættelser etc. “Targeted killing” bruges til at udrydde parlamentsmedlemmer, journalister og andre med forkerte holdninger.
Alene i år har Boko Haram haft held til at bombe eller afbrænde politets hovedkvarter, FN-bygninger, universiter, kirker, kristne hjem og mere til. Disse heltegerninger har indbragt Boko Haram tusindvis af dræbte. Nyhederne fra fredag beretter om 150 dræbte:
Militante muslimer har dræbt 150 i Nigeria
[...]Hen ved 150 personer er dræbt i det nordøstlige Nigeria ved en af de værste voldsaktioner i det vestafrikanske landet i flere år. Det siger lokale myndigheder.
En lokal militant muslimsk gruppe har taget skylden for aktionen, der fandt sted i byen Damaturu og var rettet mod politiet, offentlige bygninger og kirker.
Det skriver EkstraBladet. Reuters skriver, at yderligere 65 blev dræbt i dag. Men den slags overskrifter har de fleste nok vænnet sig til.
Der kommer helt sikkert ikke nogen og hjælper ofrene. I Nigeria har man jo opfyldt målet: multikultur. Og Vesten modtager kun “flygtninge”, hvis disse er muslimer. De skal herop for at gøre det samme, som man ser i Nigeria. Sådan er det. Allahu Akbar!
Forsidetegningen fra det nummer af Charlie Hebdo, som nogen altså mente, skulle honoreres med bombeterror, kan ses her hos Sappho.
Én israeler for 1000 palæstinensiske arabere
04. november 2011 – klumme af Rachel Adelberg Johansen
Israel stod i et moralsk dilemma med frigivelsen af Gilad Shalit. Sagen afslører en afgrundsdyb forskel på Israel og dets fjender, skriver Rachel Adelberg Johansen.
Det seneste anslag mod ytringsfriheden rejser spørgsmålet: Skal en 1400-år gammel selvudråbt “profet”, være redaktør eller skal vi selv bestemme, hvad vi vil skrive, og hvad vi vil læse?
Mere HER i Sappho. Desuden link til denne uges udgave af Sharia-toppen af Nicolai Sennels:
Tja, man må jo antage, at EU og USA ønsker en stærkere islamisering af Syrien med sharialov, udryddelse af kristne, formummede kvinder og hele balladen. Det er de mål, Vesten (og Danmark) hidtil har realiseret i Libyen, Irak, Bosnien, Kosovo. Afghanistan var stærkt islamiseret i forvejen, her har man dog fået reduceret antallet af vantro betragteligt i den tid, de vestlige styrker har været til stede. Således er den sidste kirke nu blevet jævnet med jorden og Vestens soldater har fået pålagt sharia-adfærd for toiletbesøg. Man må ikke vende røven mod Mekka. Biblen er forbudt.
Vesten har via FN ydet mere eller mindre åbenlys støtte til Hizbollah i Libanon, der jo har et større antal kristne, man kan sætte ind imod. Det må vel være en del af planen? Med samt en svækkelse af eller et angreb på Israel, selvfølgelig. Så i Syrien vil Det Muslimske Broderskab, Al Qaeda og ligende vil jo nok få betragtelig vestlig opbakning. EU-landenes repræsentanter kan jo ikke ligefrem beskyldes for at være tilhængere af demokrati. Som iagttager kan man kun græmme sig. Jihad så langt øjet rækker – Sig månen langsomt hæver:
Syria’s Choice: Murderous Secular Regime or Islamic Fundamentalists
by Khaled Abu Toameh – November 4, 2011
As Syrian dictator Bashar Assad continues to slaughter his people, there are growing indications that the Islamists are increasing their efforts to replace his regime.
What started as a secular Facebook revolution against the Assad regime is now beginning to look more like a jihad [holy war] led by Muslim fundamentalists.
The Muslim Brotherhood is clearly seeking to hijack the anti-Assad protests, in both the political and military fields.
In the past few months, there have been many signs of a “return to Islam” in Syrian society. Large banners urging women to wear the hijab have appeared in Damascus and other main cities and many restaurants and hotels have stopped serving alcohol in keeping with Islamic law. This is in addition to the fact that many of the daily anti-Assad demonstrations are being launched from mosques, especially after Friday prayers.
Mere HER hos Hudson New York. Betragter månens bue, den kun er halv at skue:
Middle East Eclipsed
U.S. policymakers fear a “Shia crescent,” a regional alliance led by Iran. A dawning “Muslim Brotherhood crescent” is far more threatening.
By Lee Smith | November 2, 2011
Until January of this year, U.S. policymakers and American allies feared what Jordan’s King Abdullah II had dubbed the “Shia crescent.” The thinking was that as Iran’s power grew, this strategic alignment of hostile governments would stretch from the Islamic Republic of Iran, through its ally Syria, on to the newly empowered Shia majority in Iraq, and up to the shores of the eastern Mediterranean where it would reach Hezbollah in Lebanon. But that was before pro-American dictators started to fall like dominoes across the region. What we’re looking at now is what some, like historian Martin Kramer, have called a “Muslim Brotherhood crescent.”
Take a look at the map. In last week’s Tunisian elections, the Islamist al-Nahda Party, once outlawed, won 90 out of 217 seats. As goes Tunisia, so goes the Arab Spring. In Libya, several Islamist figures, some of them reportedly aligned with al-Qaida, seem likely to fill the vacuum left by Muammar Qaddafi’s death. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood, the region’s oldest Islamist movement, is prepared to compete for 50 percent of the country’s parliamentary seats in elections scheduled for later this month. The exact strength of the Islamist element in the ongoing Syrian uprising remains to be seen, but the contours of this new crescent are already becoming clear.
The BBC airbrushes out Palestinian terror attacks - again
By Melanie Phillips – 30 October 2011
During the past 24 hours, Israel has been under sustained rocket attack from Gaza. Some 35 rockets and mortar shells were fired deep into the country, killing one man in Ashkelon and injuring four other people elsewhere. In Ashdod, vehicles were set on fire and a school – fortunately empty - was hit. The rocket barrage followed an IDF strike on Gaza which killed five members of Islamic Jihad - and which itself was targeted at the IJ terrorist cell responsible for launching a Grad rocket that exploded in Ashdod last Wednesday.
This, however, is how BBC News has reported the past day’s events on its website:
‘Militants killed in Israeli air strikes on Gaza
Mere HER i The Daily Mail. Kan også læses her hos Ruthfully Yours.
Journalism, propaganda and moral confusion (part two)
By Melanie Phillips – 30 October 2011
As I noted earlier today in an update on my previous post, the BBC News website finally reported yesterday’s attacks on Israel at 04:10 this morning. Anyone going to the BBC website a little later, however, will have seen this item, last updated at 08:38 GMT:
‘Ten killed in Israel-Gaza attacks
An Israeli man has been killed by a rocket attack from Gaza after nine Palestinian militants were killed by Israeli air strikes on the south of the Gaza Strip.’
This was of course quite wrong. The Israeli was murdered in Ashkelon by rocket fire from Gaza following a sequence of events which started last Wednesday with a Grad rocket attack from Gaza on Ashdod. That was followed by an Israeli strike on Gaza targeted at the Islamic Jihad cell which Israel said had carried out Wednesday’s attack and which, it said, was preparing to fire more long-range rockets. That strike in turn was used as the excuse for the barrage of rockets from Gaza yesterday which killed the Israeli in Ashkelon.
Political commentator David Horowitz reflected on several moments in his life and presented his philosophical thinking on life and mortality. Mr. Horowitz also responded to questions from members of the audience at this book-signing luncheon held at The Union League in Philadelphia.
Man skal ind til C-Span for at se video. Link HER. Ibrahim anmelder Horowitzs nye bog:
Revelations of Time
By Raymond Ibrahim – October 29, 2011
David Horowitz’s book A Point in Time is at root an exposé on the nature of Time, that double-edged sword which, by obliterating all in its path, highlights the precious from the superfluous in our lives.
In structure, the book consists of Horowitz’s reflections — from his childhood and father to his deceased daughter and own mortality — not unlike the approach of Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, whom the author quotes at length and has apparently learned much from (and a better instructor can scarcely be found).
Mere HER hos The American Thinker. Kan også læses her i FrontPage Magazine.
Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.
Seneste kommentarer