Fra maj 2012 – Spencer skrev på Jihad Watch i går:
Last Thursday I was in Chicago and agreed to debate an Islamic apologist named Nadir Ahmed, who had been longing for that moment for years. But as you watch him getting shredded in the video below, you will at once understand why Ramadan, Esposito, Aslan and the rest decided that in response to my invitation to debate, [...] “silence is sometimes an answer.”
Og videoen, hvori man blandt andet diskuterer, hvad der er tilladt indenfor islamisk slaveri og anden lavpraktisk dhimmihåndtering. Må slaveejeren voldtage sine kvindelige slaver? Må man dræbe vantro, blot fordi de er vantro? Meget vigtige spørgsmål, selvsagt, eftersom de vedrører europæernes fremtid:
“Does Islam Teach Violence?” Robert Spencer vs Nadir Ahmed
Arabiske muslimer ser nogle gange afrikanere som slaver. Sådan læser visse muslimer koranen. “Profeten” Muhammed havde masser af slaver - se eksempelvis The Religion of Peace. CNN har lavet et program om slaveri i Mauretanien. At problemet hedder islam, siger de ikke rigtig noget om:
Mauritania: Slavery’s last stronghold
Mauritania’s endless sea of sand dunes hides an open secret: An estimated 10% to 20% of the population lives in slavery.
Der følger en artikel med:
Slavery’s last stronghold
Mauritania’s endless sea of sand dunes hides an open secret: An estimated 10% to 20% of the population lives in slavery. But as one woman’s journey shows, the first step toward freedom is realizing you’re enslaved.
John D. Sutter and Edythe McNamee – March 2012
Moulkheir Mint Yarba returned from a day of tending her master’s goats out on the Sahara Desert to find something unimaginable: Her baby girl, barely old enough to crawl, had been left outdoors to die.
The usually stoic mother — whose jet-black eyes and cardboard hands carry decades of sadness — wept when she saw her child’s lifeless face, eyes open and covered in ants, resting in the orange sands of the Mauritanian desert. The master who raped Moulkheir to produce the child wanted to punish his slave. He told her she would work faster without the child on her back.
Mange islamkritikere har ikke flere illusioner tilbage, – der er ikke nogen her i hvert fald. Geller er fantastisk i denne video. Fra 22. marts 2012:
Pamela Geller
3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour
Robert Spencer
3/22/2012 Denver presentation for “Stop the Islamization of America” book tour
Fra KHOW Radios The Caplis & Silverman Show. Fra 22. marts 2012:
If you missed Caplis and Silverman three o’clock hour yesterday, you missed a lot! But worry not, it is the featured podcast at www.khow.com. BTW, when Spencer and Geller were asked about military action against Iran’s nuclear program, they both said yes. When asked when it should occur, both said, “YESTERDAY!”
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 38½ minutter.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch is in studio with Peter for the Full hour. Peter and Robert discuss the history of Islam and the vast differences between Islamic and western culture and philosophy. Robert Spencer and Peter discuss Jihad in Europe, Jefferson and the Jihadist, Bush and Obama and western governments misunderstanding of Islamic law and culture, slavery and Islam and Arab Muslims slaughtering black Africans and more.
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Varer 33½ minut.
Time to Get Out of Afghanistan
March 19, 2012 – By Robert Spencer
The Afghan mission is imploding, and the Obama administration is covering for Islamic jihadists. Last week, Marine officials revealed that a Marine killed on February 1 in what the Pentagon called “combat operations” at the time was actually murdered by a jihadist in the Afghan army. The cover-up of this latest jihad attack from a supposed ally is emblematic of a failed mission. It is long past time to end the mission in Afghanistan.
Hamid Karzai has said that he wants Afghan forces to take control of the nation’s security in 2013, not 2014 as American officials are planning. Karzai is a scoundrel, but he is right about this, albeit for the wrong reasons. This mission is foredoomed. There is no clearly defined goal, and in any case, any goal worth reaching is impossible to achieve. There is no bringing democracy or humane values to a sharia state, and in any case, we already gave the Karzai regime a sharia constitution, so we aren’t really even trying to do anything effective for women or non-Muslims or the freedom of speech or the freedom of conscience. We’re fighting against an enemy that the vice president of the United States says is not an enemy, and that our client president of Afghanistan threatens to join. How long is this madness going to continue?
Egypt Designates Israel Its Top Enemy — Obama Restores Military Aid
by Robert Spencer on Mar 21st, 2012
Egypt’s parliament, which is dominated by two pro-Sharia Islamic supremacist groups, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists, voted unanimously last Monday to expel Israel’s ambassador to Egypt, and signaled that the Camp David Accords would soon be a thing of the past: Egypt, the parliamentarians declared, would “never” be Israel’s ally. In fact, Israel was Egypt’s “number one enemy.” And how did Barack Obama respond to this egregious trampling upon the agreement that has kept an uneasy peace between Israel and Egypt for thirty years? By announcing a resumption of military aid to Egypt.
From the beginning of the “Arab Spring,” I said repeatedly that it was not a democracy movement, as the Western press was claiming, but an Islamic supremacist takeover that would result in the creation of Sharia states that would be far more hostile to the U.S. and Israel than the Arab nationalist regimes they were supplanting. This assessment was greeted with the usual scorn: the Islamic supremacist media machine charged “Islamophobia,” on Fox Juan Williams said I was “fearmongering,” and the usual suspects made the usual ad hominem attacks. Yet everything that has happened since then has shown that the “Arab Spring” is indeed an Islamic supremacist winter, ushering in repressive Sharia regimes with the enthusiastic blessing of Barack Obama.
They hate us because we’re pigs. No, not the apes and pigs into which Allah transforms the Sabbath-breaking Jews in the Qur’an (2:62-66; 5:59-60; 7:166), but pigs as in…dogs. Wolves. Immoral, lecherous, lustful, fornicating creeps. Western immorality is a frequent feature of the Islamic critique of the contemporary West, as well as a target for the morality police of Sharia states. In the summer of 2009 Iranian authorities even published a list of hairstyles that were acceptably moral and Islamic, as opposed to “decadent” Western imports, among which were the ponytail and the mullet.
That same Western decadence is also a frequent preoccupation of Islamic jihadists. In December 2010, a Muslim named Taimour Abdulwahab al-Abdaly set off explosives on a street in Stockholm that was crowded with Christmas shoppers, killing himself and injuring two others. His wife, who was herself later arrested for helping plan the attack, explained that Abdulwahab “disliked the decadent side of society here.”
Even some non-Muslim writers echo this critique. Dinesh D’Souza argued in his 2007 farrago The Enemy At Home that Islamic jihadists were largely motivated by rage at the West’s “social and moral corruption,” and asserted that “the Muslims who hate us the most are the ones who have encountered Western decadence, either in the West or in their own countries.”
Iransk kulturimperialisme er velkendt for folk, der også frekventerer andet end den etablerede halalpresse. Men derefter begynder det vist også at knibe. I Københavns borgerrepræsentation læser de i hvert fald ikke Hudson New York. De røde lefler for islamisme:
Iran’s “Invasion” of Latin America
by Anna Mahjar-Barducci – September 21, 2011
The Arab uprisings are changing the geopolitical map. When old allies might become new enemies, a country like Iran has a lot to lose. Teheran is now concerned about becoming even more isolated — and for good reasons.
Qatar, for one, which used to be aligned with Iran, has switched sides. The small Emirate that owns the powerful satellite television channel Al-Jazeera now prefers to side with the rebels, and is supporting the uprising in Syria — another move away from Iran. If the Syrian uprising topples the regime, Damascus will probably not continue good relations with Teheran, a choice that will also have political repercussions in Lebanon.
Note: The Biblical texts were never rewritten. They have however been translated into multiple languages. The Vatican and all other churches deny having rewritten anything but this untrue claim is in the Koran.
Gary Hardgrave is joined by Dr Daniel Pipes, President of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University. Dr Pipes provides an educated insight into the Middle East, Islam and Sharia.
In a story last week in the British newspaper The Sun, a private investigator stated that Madeleine McCann, the subject of probably the world’s most famous unsolved kidnapping case, is in the United States. The British girl was three years old when she went missing five years ago from a seaside resort in Portugal, where her parents were vacationing. The Portuguese police, in what has been termed a “bungled investigation,” at first accused the parents of the abduction but later cleared them. Portuguese security officials halted their investigation to find the missing child in 2008 after stating she had probably been “stolen to order.”
Since her disappearance, numerous alleged sightings have been made of the little girl across Europe, Africa, in North America and in Australia. The investigator making the latest claim concerning McCann’s whereabouts is an amateur sleuth originally from Angola. He told The Sun that a Portuguese pedophile ring, also responsible for other child abductions, took the McCann girl and has handed his findings over to authorities. The claim that a pedophile ring is responsible for McCann’s disappearance has been made before, especially concerning one in Belgium. And while Madeleine McCann girl may have very well been snatched by such evil hands, it is surprising that an equally depraved institution — one of gigantic size — has never even been considered by investigators or the media as McCann’s possible kidnapper: namely, the Arab child slave trade.
One of the least known aspects of the current Libyan conflict is its brutal, racial component. Media reports claim Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi is using black African mercenaries in his war against the rebels. In retaliation, the insurgents have targeted in violent attacks African immigrant workers living in Libya, from whom, the rebels believe, Gaddafi is recruiting his mercenaries. Before the uprising began, an estimated 1.5 million Africans resided in Libya, many as low-paid labourers, but the violence has caused a large number to flee the country or to go into hiding.
Beatings, kidnappings, robbery and even executions are among the crimes the rebels are accused of committing against immigrant Africans and suspected black mercenaries. Videos have emerged showing the rebels’ irrational and inhuman cruelty towards Africans. One is of a beheading in Benghazi, the rebel stronghold, of a blood-covered man “suspended upside-down.” Hundreds of onlookers are cheering and filming the savagery to shouts of “Allahu Akbar.” One is heard commenting on the victim’s African looks. Another video shows an alleged African mercenary being mercilessly beaten.
Mere HER hos AINA. Kan også læses her i FrontPageMagazine.
Ny terrorhandling imod kristne i Egypten. En mand er blevet dræbt og mindst fem andre såret efter en nedskydning i et tog, skriver Jyllands-Posten. Fredens religion igen. Herunder et lille udpluk af artikler om kristnes situation og antisemitismen i Mellemøsten fra den sidste ugestid:
The Islamic Fantasy Zionist Jihad
by Robert Spencer – January 11, 2011
Did you know that Israeli Mossad agents murdered 22 people and wounded 80 more at the Coptic Christian Church of Saints George and Peter in Alexandria, Egypt, on New Year’’s Eve? Neither did I. But all around the Islamic world, that’s the story being told — in yet another instance of Muslim denial of jihadist violence, and displacement of responsibility upon their favorite scapegoat, the Jews.
Iran’s PressTV, an official organ of the Islamic Republic, claimed in an unsigned editorial that “the fresh plot by terrorists to target churches is an organized Zionist scenario aimed at creating a rift between Muslims and Christians.” Lebanese Shi’ite leader Sheikh Abdel Amir Kabalan struck a tone so similar as to give the impression that a set of talking points were being circulated: “This terrorist act bears the fingerprints of Zionists who keep on targeting religious sites and are working to . . . sow discord between Muslims and Christians.”
The Real Reasons for the Massacres of Christians and Jews in the Middle East
by Fiamma Nirenstein – January 10, 2011
How can we stop the slaughter of Christians in the Islamic world; how can we prevent the next massacre in Iraq, Turkey, the Philippines, Nigeria, wherever Islamic groups may be?
First of all, we should start calling things by their real names. This is not ideological “religious intolerance,” and the perpetrators are not random “fundamentalist groups” or “some terrorists.” There are countless examples of this sort of violence all over the map: massacres, expulsions, kidnapping of women, acts of vandalism on churches… It is the entire Islamist world that is battering Christians with the terrible inexorability of its hatred, but all those who – out of lack of opportunity or for fear of reprisals – have kept silent, in hopes of appeasing the aggressors, share in the responsibility. When the Pope protested, calling Islam “Islam,” the Mufti of Al Azhar blasted him for “interference,” — an occurrence that says a lot about the paradoxical attitude of institutional Islam: What do a few murders matter? The perpetual enemy in Rome has no right to speak out.
Islamists ‘build their scapegoat’ for church bombing
By Steven Emerson – January 4, 2011
Analysis: Muslim Brotherhood official, Egyptian lawyers group, Lebanon’s grand mufti have all blamed the Jews, with varying motives.
The New Year’s Eve suicide bombing at an Egyptian Coptic church that killed 21 people is stoking fears of a new onslaught against Christians by radical Islamists. In response, some radical Islamists are turning to their great bogeyman to deflect attention – the Zionists.
“Mossad behind Egypt church blast,” Iran’s official television outlet, Press TV, said in a headline Sunday. All the evidence points to a Zionist plot, the article said. First, “it goes without saying that no Muslim, whatever their political leanings may be, will ever commit such an inhumane act.” In addition, Press TV reported that “the fresh plot by terrorists to target churches is an organized Zionist scenario aimed at creating a rift between Muslims and Christians.” Christians are expressing fear the attack marks a widening of attacks by radical Islamists, which have increased dramatically in Iraq. Dozens of people were killed after terrorists took more than 120 Christians hostage in a Baghdad Catholic church in late October.
The murder of 21 Christians in a New Year’s Day bomb attack in Alexandria will accelerate the ongoing exodus of the Coptic community from Egypt. Its members know that they are second-class citizens. After some three-dozen attacks over the past three decades, resulting in three hundred Christian deaths, they know that the government is both unable and unwilling to protect them. They know that the usual expressions of regret by Muslim clerics and politicians are pure hypocrisy and taqiyya.
They have not forgotten that Egypt is yet to convict a single murderer in an earlier massacre that also killed 21 Copts: the January 1, 2000, outrage in the village of Al-Kosheh, 300 miles south of Cairo. A year later the court convicted just two of 96 Muslim defendants on lesser charges of “accidental homicide.” From the outset, the government of Egypt had sought to avoid the political minefield of punishing Muslims for the murder of Christians. That verdict paved the way for the bloodshed in Alexandria.
Mere HER i Chronicles Magazine eller her i Novakeo. Den næste artikel minder lidt vel meget om dem ovenfor:
Egypt: Why Muslim Terrorists Should Not Be Worried
by Khaled Abu Toameh – January 7, 2011
The Muslim terrorists behind the New Year church massacre in Alexandria, Egypt, must be laughing their heads off as they see and hear an increasing number of Egyptians and Arabs point an accusing finger at the Mossad and Jews.
What is disturbing is that these allegations have now made their way to the mainstream media in Egypt and the rest of the Arab world.
While many Arabs are now busy trying to figure out how the Mossad and Jews managed to blow up the church, the terrorists are able to safely plan their next attack on Christian targets.
Angrebet, der fandt sted i fredags i hovedstaden Nouakchott, sårede tre mennesker fra en nærliggende restaurant, mens israelerne slap uskadt.
Omkring seks personer skød mod ambassaden og en nærliggende bar, før de forlod gerningsstedet mens de råbte “Gud er stor” på arabisk.
Det skriver Berlingske Tidende. Terrorangrebet var begået af de sædvanlige fredsaktivister. Fra TV2:
Terrororganisationen al Qaeda i Maghreb har i et brev til den arabiske tv-station al-Jazeera påtaget skylden for angrebet på den israelske ambassade i Mauretaniens hovedstad Nouakchott.
I følge Al Qaeda var det det sharialovpligtige jødehad fra koranen, der foranledigede angrebet. Fra Jyllands-Posten:
“Arabiske lande må ikke have diplomatiske forbindelser til Israel”, hed det blandt andet i meddelelsen fra al Qaida.
Det israelske efterretningsvæsen siger imidlertid, at det var selve restauranten, der var mål for angrebet. Den leverer mad til vesterlinge i hovedstaden. Det skriver The Jerusalem Post.
Juleaften blev fire franskmænd myrdet og fem andre blev såret under et røveri i Den Islamiske Republik Mauretanien, som landet retteligt hedder. Al Qaeda er mistænkt for også at stå bag denne forbrydelse. Et par dage senere var der et angreb på en af landets militærbaser.
Som følge af sikkerhedssituationen droppede arrangørerne af det legendariske ørken-racerløb Dakar Rally begivenheden for i år, fordi ruten gik gennem Mauritanien. Channel 4 skriver, at der blev fremsat terrortrusler imod løbet og deltagerne af militante muslimer – terroristgrupper – i Mauretanien.
Det gennemislamiserede land kan også prale af at have slaveri i meget stor målestok, hvilket jo er tilladt i islam. Over 600.000 slaver. Det er mere end hver 5. indbygger. Såmænd.
Mauretanien har som en række andre afrikanske lande langs Saharas sydlige grænse haft svært ved at befri sig for århundreders modbydelig tradition, hvor slaveri er en normal del af hverdagen, og hvor en slavefamilie kan gå i arv.
SOS-Slavery skønner, at 600.000 af indbyggerne i Mauretanien er slaver eller tvangsarbejdere, men tallene er her som i andre lande med samme tradition svære at verificere.
Historikere mener, at slaveholdet blev introduceret af fremrykkende arabere i det 7. århundrede under indtryk af islams accept af, at vantro kunne behandles som slaver. Omkring år 1900 var der således op mod fem millioner slaver i de islamiske vestafrikanske lande
Det er nemlig rigtigt. Slaveri et tilladt i islam. Det er Berlingske Tidende, der på det mest politisk ukorrekte fortæller sandheden om slaveri i islam. Der nævnes flere lande i artiklen. Menneskerettighedsorganisationen Anti-Slavery International skønner
at op mod 40.000 mennesker i Niger lever et liv som slaver et liv de fødes til.
Den lokale anti-slavery organisation Timidira vurderer ifølge BBC, at 870.000 indbyggere lever som tvangsarbejdere.
Og gennemgangen fortsætter:
i Nigeria, er der den dag i dag også stor efterspørgsel på tvangsarbejdere og slaver. Specielt børn og unge. FNs børnefond UNICEF anslog i 2001, at op mod 200.000 børn og unge i alderen syv til 18 år bliver handlet hen over grænserne i Vest og Centralafrika. I det område kommer de fleste fra Benin og Togo, og de ender i Nigerias olieindustri.
Ifølge UNICEF importerer også lande som Niger og Burkina Faso børneslaver. Som daværende talsmand for UNICEF dengang sagde til CNN: »Slavehandlen stoppede aldrig i Vestafrika«.
Også i Sudan har slaveriet haft gode kår under den årtier lange borgerkrig mellem det arabiske nord og det afrikanske syd. Op mod 40.000 børn og unge fra de sydlige områder blev gennem årene bortført til det nordlige Sudan, hvor de har levet som slaver.
Dertil kommer sexslaveriet, som man altid går let henover. Frihedsberøvelse og tvangsarbejde ses åbenbart som værre end når slaveriet består af både frihedsberøvelse, tvangsarbejde og daglige serievoldtægter.
Og så er der slaveholdet i de arabiske lande. Der er blandt andet slaver i Saudi Arabien. Det nævnes så godt som aldrig i vestlige medier.
Slaveri har eksisteret i Mauretanien i hvert fald siden det 7. århundrede og selvom det officielt har været forbudt siden 1981, er der ingenting sket. Men landets nye præsident lover nu at afskaffe slaveriet. Den 69-årige Cheikh Abdallahi vandt præsidentvalget i søndags med 53 procent af stemmerne. Det skriver dr.dk/Nyheder om i to forskellige artikler.
Slaverne passer kamelerne, vogter gederne og serverer te for gæsterne. De bliver banket og voldtaget, når de ikke makker ret, eller det blot passer deres herrer – og en gang slave altid slave.
Yahoo! News skriver om maurerne, slaveriet og Mauretanien:
They may number thousands, anti-slavery activists say. A shocking anomaly in the 21st century, this is widely accepted in a racially diverse, hierarchical society dominated by a Moorish elite and a brand of Islam that preaches submission.
Og:
“There is slavery in our country, in all of our society. You need laws to eliminate it. The fact people try to hide what exists just complicates things,” said Messaoud Ould Boulkheir, a black Mauritanian and descendant of slaves.
Artiklen fra Yahoo! News er meget spændende, men jeg har ikke tid til at gøre mere ved den. Men den anbefales.
Slaveri eksisterer i flere lande end mange tror. Slaveri er nemlig tilladt i islam, hvorfor det er i de islamiske lande, man finder det. Hovedparten af de islamiske lovskoler tillader slaveri. ”Profeten” Muhammed havde selv slaver.
Om Mauretanien og befolkningen
Mauretanien har lidt over tre millioner indbyggere – som lever sammen på et areal 25 gange så stort som Danmark. Det er en af verdens allerfattigste stater – placeret i Afrika mellem Atlanterhavet og Sahara syd for Marokko. Befolkningen er arabere, berbere og afrikanere. Leksikon.org skriver:
70% af mauretanierne er «maurere» – de nedstammer fra det folk, der i middelalderen skabte Almoravide imperiet. Maurerne var det oprindelige navn for de nomadefolk, der levede i det nordvestlige Afrika – en blanding mellem arabere, berbere og andre folk. De øvrige 30% af befolkningen stammer fra lidt sydligere egne i Afrika.
Religion: Islam. Sunni-muslimer 99,5 pct., katolikker 0,2 pct., andre 0,3 pct.
Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.
Seneste kommentarer