The British Freedom Party har lavet en ny video om sit partiprogram – 20 punkter (den næstsidste video er den bedste):
Paul Weston June 12 2012 20 point agenda
EDL / British Freedom Press Conference
Tommy Robinson, Kevin Carroll and Paul Weston announce the appointment of the joint leaders of the English Defence League as joint Vice Chairmen of the British Freedom Party in Luton on Saturday 5th May 2012.
British Freedom Party Chairman – Paul Weston – IFPS Dinner Speech – Toronto – Feb 19, 2012
Paul Weston, Chairman of the British Freedom Party speaks to the International Free Press Society – Canada in Toronto on February 19, 2012.
Mr. Weston warns Canada of the encroachment of Islam in society using the British example where that society has seen the establishment of Sharia courts and a hands-off approach be law enforcement. He foresees a coming civil war in the United Kingdom between Muslims and those Britons who hold traditional British views of liberalism, individual rights and freedom.
Robert Vaughan interviewer:
British Freedom Party Chairman – Paul Weston on Just Right Feb 19 2012 Toronto
Og endnu et interview om England og partiet:
A Future for Britain Free from Islamization: An Interview with British Freedom Party Chairman, Paul Weston
24 March 2012 – Jerry Gordon
The United Kingdom, or as Daily Mail pundit, Melanie Phillips calls it, Londonistan, has been mired in massive demographic change and concomitant Islamization brought on by its recent “open door” immigration policy. This was graphically evident in the July 7, 2005 London underground and bus system attack by four British Muslim suicide bombers who took the lives of more than 52 innocent victims and injured over 700. It was also reflected in the condoning of the more than 85 Shariah courts by the UK legal system and controversial Church of England head, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams. Deeply disturbing has been the de facto creation of what former Bishop of Rochester Michael Nazir-Ali called “no-go areas” where native Britons are not welcome, especially if they happen to be homosexual or Jewish.
Mere HER i The New English Review eller her hos Right Side News.
Et kuriosum: Den særdeles katolske Ann Barnhardt har en stadigt voksende fanskare. Nu er der lavet en lille tegnefilm med nogle af Ann Barnhardts replikker. Barnhardt er ikke begejstret for Mitt Romney:
Ann Barnhardt blasts Mitt Romney
Watch as Ann gives Mitt a piece of her mind! To find out all about Ann, be sure to visit her You Tube channel
Og Warren Pollock interviewer Barnhardt for fjerde gang. Videoen er delt i to - fra 25. maj 2012:
Facebook
Social or Antisocial networking blocks true-humanistic-contact and relations with people. Do not confuse broadcasting these details with anything else but the culture of self absorption. Additionally you are handing the most intimate details of your life to a “Self Service Spy Ring.” Yes, you are giving the most vulnerable aspects of your life to the Government and the Corporate Oligarchy. You are helping those people working against your best interests. The Soviets dreamed of having an intelligence network of this camera by having local neighborhood spy rings. With Facebook you are doing this disservice to yourself.
Ann Barnhardt, a Constitutional Review w Solutions
Der følger en længere afhandling med, som jeg har sat under videoen. Den yderste højrefløj i USA er noget for sig. Der er ikke rigtig noget bidrag her, som en konservativ på vore breddergradder kan bruge til noget:
We the people of the United States Establish Justice? Totalitarian states are rich in law and short in justice. We live in an age “whereby our rights have been incrementally and consistently destroyed.” Ann Barnhardt; Ann Barnhardt reviews the “Bill of Rights” and the “Constitution” against the realities of the day here in the “First Republic of the United States.” Is it possible that years of legislation and malfeasance, by the corporate oligarchy, has had the effect of ……. Find out about the fate of the United States in this ground breaking interview by Warren Pollock of Ann Barnhardt at her best as an advocate for freedom. Ann and I host our own little “Tea Party,” but not the kind the establishment would want to have.
Lets put a few phrases to the test.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Mr Obama “You don’t need to go to any court to know you cannot be born in two places at once, except the court of logic.” Warren Pollock
Islam er misforstået, hører vi. Igen og igen. Det er så imamsk det hele. Fra Aramaic Broadcasting Network 4. juni 2012:
Christianity or lslam ?
Opdatering:
Egypt’s Nightmare: Islamists or the Military?
By Nonie Darwish – June 6, 2012
The laws of nature are uncovering Egypt’s nightmare after the revolution when Egyptians are suddenly facing the limitations and suppression Islam has created in their political institutions over decades and even centuries. The political drama keeps unfolding exposing only two deeply rooted forces who are the winners in the recent elections, namely the Islamists represented in the Muslim Brotherhood, or Askar, Arabic for military.
When the Egyptians where given the chance to vote in their president for the first time in their over five thousand year long history, they found themselves instinctively electing Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood and Ahmed Shafiq, a no nonsense military leader and former Prime Minister. One of two men will win soon in the general election. The first represents a Sharia based Theocracy, while the second who is the lesser of two evils, represents the military. Traditionally the Muslim world has resorted to brute military force as the only way to restrain and contain the Islamists. But either choice has never accomplished a democracy based on freedom of citizens. Thus either choice for Egyptians will bring them back to square one; back to tyranny under either system, a destiny no Muslim state has succeeded to avoid.
Spencer modtager dødstrusler på grund af sin bog, skriver Arutz Sheva:
Several more threats from the same Twitter account were also sent, calling for killing David Wood, a blogger and Teaching Fellow in Philosophy, as well as blogger Pamela Geller who writes on the “Atlas Shrugs” website. The threat to Geller stated, “she needs to be hung or slaughtered because of her hatred.”
Fredens religion, hvad ellers? Video med de dødstruede mennesker:
Robert Spencer vs. David Wood: Did Muhammad Exist?
Muslims and non-Muslims assume that Muhammad existed. Robert Spencer’s new book challenges this assumption, charging that the Muhammad of Islam is shrouded in myths and legends. Can David Wood defend Muhammad’s existence against Robert’s arguments? Find out as Robert and David debate the topic, “Did Muhammad Exist?”
Alle dem, der ikke er halalhippier, må ikke sige noget. Fuld censur og bremsen i. I Danmark kan man vælge imellem at være rød, ultraliberalist eller racist. Hele det konservative midtersegment bedes udvandre promte:
Politiet bekræfter, at de bruger § 266b politisk
Klumme af Torben Mark Pedersen – 29. maj 2012
Torben Mark Pedersen er i dag blevet sigtet for overtrædelse af §266b og konstaterer, at det kun er ”krænkelser ” af religiøse grupper, der fører til sigtelse. Etniske grupper er det straffrit at krænke.
Gud, frihed og Englands mørke fremtid. Interview med Peter Hitchens
Interview af Katrine Winkel Holm – 29. maj 2012
Den engelske forfatter og journalist Peter Hitchens er gået til angreb på den aggressive ateisme, som hans bror Christopher Hitchens var bannerfører for. Han spår friheden en dyster fremtid i et afkristnet England. Læs hans diagnose af det multikulturelle England.
Et hyggeligt interview om Israel, USA, jura og mere. Fra Shalom TV - ser ud til at være fra 14. maj 2012:
Alan Dershowitz On Current Issues
Critiquing Peter Beinart and Middle East peace, explaining how President Obama disappointed him, and discussing Supreme Court “activism” and whether it should review “Obama Care,” Harvard Law Prof. Alan Dershowitz meets with Shalom TV’s Mark S. Golub.
Et lidt specielt foredrag her. Kristendommens betydning for Oplysningstiden. Kristne værdier. Sekularisme. Humanitærpopulister. Multikultur. Islam. Og mere:
Bishop Michael Nazir Ali’s address to The Iona Institute
The Church of England Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali gave a talk to the Iona Institute on May 9th, 2012 on the positive contribution of Christianity to law and culture and how it is now under threat from the “triple jeopardy” of aggressive secularism, multiculturalism and radical Islamism.
Bishop Nazir-Ali is originally from Pakistan and was the first non-white Diocesan Bishop in the Church of England. He was appointed in 1994. Prior to that he was Bishop of Raiwind in Pakistan. He holds both British and Pakistani citizenship and from 1999 was a member of the House of Lords where he was active in a number of areas of national and international concern. He has both a Christian and a Muslim family background.
Bishop Nazir-Ali has been a visiting lecturer in a number of universities and colleges in the UK, Canada, the USA and Australia. He has travelled widely in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North and South America. He is the author of ten books and of numerous articles on Mission, Ecumenism, the Anglican Communion, and relations with people of other faiths.
Startes HER – åbner Windows Media Player. Q&A HER. Varer hhv. 1 time og 24 minutter.
Fra maj 2012 – Spencer skrev på Jihad Watch i går:
Last Thursday I was in Chicago and agreed to debate an Islamic apologist named Nadir Ahmed, who had been longing for that moment for years. But as you watch him getting shredded in the video below, you will at once understand why Ramadan, Esposito, Aslan and the rest decided that in response to my invitation to debate, [...] “silence is sometimes an answer.”
Og videoen, hvori man blandt andet diskuterer, hvad der er tilladt indenfor islamisk slaveri og anden lavpraktisk dhimmihåndtering. Må slaveejeren voldtage sine kvindelige slaver? Må man dræbe vantro, blot fordi de er vantro? Meget vigtige spørgsmål, selvsagt, eftersom de vedrører europæernes fremtid:
“Does Islam Teach Violence?” Robert Spencer vs Nadir Ahmed
Did Muhammad Exist? Robert Spencer & David Wood vs. Anjem Choudary & Omar Bakri
Did Muhammad exist? Robert Spencer’s new book claims that he didn’t. Can Muslims defend the existence of their prophet? In this debate, Spencer teams up with David Wood against Anjem Choudary and Sheikh Omar Bakri to see whether Muslims can offer historical evidence for one of their most fundamental beliefs.
Man kan læse et lille uddrag af Spencers bog i Crisis Magazine:
Spencer har genbrugt en stor del af uddraget i en artikel, som kan læses her hos Atlas Shrugs. Og flere artikler af Spencer:
Inventing Muhammad?
By Robert Spencer – April 23, 2012
Why would it matter if Muhammad never existed? Certainly the accepted story of Islam’s origins is taken for granted as historically accurate; while many don’t accept Muhammad’s claim to have been a prophet, few doubt that there was a man named Muhammad who in the early seventh century began to claim that he was receiving messages from Allah through the angel Gabriel. Many who hear about my new book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins ask why it would matter whether or not Muhammad existed — after all, a billion Muslims believe he did, and they are not going to stop doing so because of some historical investigations. Yet the numerous indications that the standard account of Muhammad’s life is more legend than fact actually have considerable implications for the contemporary political scene.
These are just a few of the weaknesses in the traditional account of Muhammad’s life and the early days of Islam:
No record of Muhammad’s reported death in 632 appears until more than a century after that date.
The early accounts written by the people the Arabs conquered never mention Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an. They call the conquerors “Ishmaelites,” “Saracens,” “Muhajirun,” and “Hagarians,” but never “Muslims.”
The Arab conquerors, in their coins and inscriptions, don’t mention Islam or the Qur’an for the first six decades of their conquests. Mentions of “Muhammad” are non-specific and on at least two occasions are accompanied by a cross. The word can be used not only as a proper name, but also as an honorific.
The Qur’an, even by the canonical Muslim account, was not distributed in its present form until the 650s. Casting into serious doubt that standard account is the fact that neither the Arabians nor the Christians and Jews in the region mention its existence until the early eighth century.
We don’t begin to hear about Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, and about Islam itself until the 690s, during the reign of the caliph Abd al-Malik. Coins and inscriptions reflecting Islamic beliefs begin to appear at this time also.
In the middle of the eighth century, the Abbasid dynasty supplanted the Umayyad line of Abd al-Malik. In the Abbasid period, biographical material about Muhammad began to proliferate. The first complete biography of the prophet of Islam finally appeared during this era-at least 125 years after the traditional date of his death.
When I mention the title of my new book Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins, many are startled, as they had no idea that there was any question that such a larger-than-life character might be legendary rather than historical. But in reality, no one who interacted with those who conquered the Middle East in the middle of the seventh century ever seems to have gotten the impression that a prophet named Muhammad, whose followers burst from Arabia bearing a new holy book and a new creed, was behind the conquests.
This may seem to be an odd claim. After all, there are the well-known accounts of the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem. Those depict the caliph Umar meeting Sophronius and treating him respectfully, even magnanimously declining to pray in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre so that his followers will not be able to seize the church and convert it into a mosque. Umar and Sophronius conclude a pact that forbids Christians from building new churches, carrying arms, or riding on horses, and that requires them to pay a poll tax, jizya, to the Muslims; but Christians are generally allowed to practice their religion and live in relative peace. This is the foundation of the Islamic legal superstructure of dhimmitude, which denies equality of rights to non-Muslims in the Islamic state and is oppressive in numerous ways by modern standards, but which in the seventh century was comparatively tolerant.
Author of 12 books, including the recently released Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins.
April 26, 2012 – by Barry Rubin
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of twelve books, including two New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery). His latest book is Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins (ISI). He is interviewed by Barry Rubin, PJ Media’s Middle East editor.
Rubin: What is the basic aim of the Jihad Watch site and of your books?
Spencer: The aim of all my work is to alert the public in the United States and around the world about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, with particular attention to the aspect of the threat that has been most obfuscated and obscured: its motives, goals, and root causes, as explained by the jihadis themselves. At Jihad Watch I post on a daily basis news stories showing jihad activity, both violent and stealthy, in the U.S. and worldwide. In my books I explore aspects of the issue in detail, most notably the chief motivating factors named by jihadis themselves: the Qur’an and the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
Mere HER hos PJ Media. Jamie Glazov har endnu et interview med Spencer her i FrontPageMagazine. Boganmeldelser:
Robert Spencer Asks: Did Muhammad Exist?
by Bruce Thornton on Apr 23rd, 2012
One of the jihadists’ most potent psychological weapons is the double standard Muslims have imposed on the West. Temples and churches are destroyed and vandalized, Christians murdered and driven from the lands of Christianity’s birth, anti-Semitic lunacy propagated by high-ranking Muslim clerics, and Christian territory like northern Cyprus ethnically cleansed and occupied by Muslims. Yet the West ignores these depredations all the while it agonizes over trivial “insults” to Islam and Mohammed, and decries the thought-crime of “Islamophobia” whenever even factual statements are made about Islamic history and theology. This groveling behavior confirms the traditional Islamic chauvinism that sees Muslims as the “best of nations” destined by Allah to rule the world through violent jihad.
Even in the rarefied world of academic scholarship, this fear of offense has protected Islam from the sort of critical scrutiny every other world religion has undergone for centuries. Some modern scholars who do exercise their intellectual freedom and investigate these issues, like Christoph Luxenberg or Ibn Warraq, must work incognito to avoid the wrath of the adherents of the “Religion of Peace.” Now Robert Spencer, the fearless director of Jihad Watch and author of several books telling the truths about Islam obscured by a frightened academy and media, in his new book Did Muhammad Exist? challenges this conspiracy of fear and silence by surveying the scholarship and historical evidence for the life and deeds of Islam’s founder.
Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. Kan også læses her hos Free Republic.
Book Review: Did Muhammad Exist?, by Robert Spencer
April 23, 2012 – by Zombie
Scholars have for centuries been pursuing clues to “the historical Jesus” — evidence that the religious figure now known as Jesus Christ actually once existed as a real person. There have been hundreds, if not thousands, of popular books, documentaries, television programs, magazine articles, research papers, films and more on the search for the “real” Jesus. While this investigation into the ultimate origins of Christianity may have once long ago been controversial, it is by now quite commonplace and accepted as a standard part of religious studies, even when the researchers conclude (as they often do) that the evidence for the historicity of Jesus is skimpy at best.
But no similar investigations have ever been conducted on the historicity of Muhammad (a.k.a. Mohammed, depending on the Arabic transliteration). Why not?
Most people assume that no one bothers to investigate whether or not Muhammad was a real person for the same reason that no one bothers to investigate the reality of other religious founders such as Joseph Smith or Martin Luther or Anton LaVey — because the evidence for their existence is overwhelming, well-documented and unquestioned. Regardless of whether or not Muhammad’s teachings were moral or useful, everyone, even the most hardened infidels, of course accepts that he must have existed. Right?
Last night in Dearborn, Michigan, while the Islamic supremacists raged and fulminated, we held our Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference on Honor Killing. We told the whole truth about the justifications for honor killing in Islamic law, and other related instances of aspects of Islamic law advancing in the U.S. We stood determined to defend the principles of the equality of dignity of all people, and their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
It was a superb evening, thanks in large part to your support. The Islamic supremacist/Leftist smear and hate machine was out in force, holding a rally of their own earlier in the day and then attempting to storm our event and get in despite the fact that they had not registered. We had advertised for weeks that no one would be admitted without registering first. With their usual mendacity they have tried to spin this as our not allowing Muslims into the conference, but if no Muslims really got in, that was solely because no Muslims registered — if indeed there were indeed no Muslims inside. In any case, while these disturbances were roiling outside the door, our crack security detail, made possible by your kind and generous donations in response to our appeal Saturday, ensured that only those who registered got in, and that thuggish Leftist and Islamic supremacist brownshirts were unable to harm the speakers or attendees.
- Robert Spencer
Og selve konferencen:
Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference
Pamela Geller, Darwin Jiles, Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish, David Wood, Robert Muise, James Lafferty, Michael Coren, Magdi Khalil, Simon Deng
Og artikel:
Opposing honor killing is ‘Islamophobia’?
Pamela Geller tells of dueling conferences on either side of Shariah
by Pamela Geller – May 2, 2012
We held our AFDI/SIOA Jessica Mokdad Human Rights conference last Sunday in Dearborn, the first honor-killing conference of its kind. Hundreds converged upon the Hyatt to join Robert Spencer and me and a full roster of luminaries to educate, elucidate and shine a light on the ugly and brutal atrocities under the Shariah. As expected, the goons, thugs and Muslim supremacists were also out in force. It seems that Islamic supremacists support murder for “honor,” for these subversive groups energetically opposed our conference dedicated to exposing the plight of women under Islamic law on the first anniversary of the honor murder of a Muslim girl in Michigan, Jessica Mokdad.
When we first called the conference, which we did to increase awareness of honor killings and gendercide under the Shariah, the only attention the media paid to it at all was to give a platform to the Mokdad family, which was whining that Jessica’s name was being used. Such grief – so touching the way so many Muslims go into “protect Islam” mode and not “protect our girls.”
St. Elizabeth’s Church ligger i Dundonald – det er lige i omegnen af Belfast. Her er tale om en prædiken fra 22. april 2012. Den første del er ret traditionel, i anden del kommer Nazir-Ali ind på islam i England:
Sermon Audio: Bishop Michael Nazir Ali
Sunday morning 22nd April 2012
Preacher: Bishop Michael Nazir Ali
One of the most prominent figures in the Church of England has joined a landmark court case over the right of Christians to wear the cross.
The Rt Rev Michael Nazir Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester, has written to the European Court of Human Rights in support of Christians who claim they suffered discrimination at work when they were banned from displaying the symbol.
Marriage has had a good press lately. More people are marrying and more people are staying married. This is welcome news. I have recently met a number of community groups that promote marriage in schools, colleges and generally in society, an encouraging and hopeful experience for me. But of course while I welcome this greater interest in marriage, both in promoting it and defending it, it is impossible to do so unless we understand what marriage and the family are.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren to discuss his latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?
Desuden dette interview:
An Interview with Robert Spencer
by Barry Rubin – April 26, 2012
Spencer: What is the basic aim of the Jihad Watch site and of your books?
Spencer: The aim of all my work is to alert the public in the United States and around the world about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, with particular attention to the aspect of the threat that has been most obfuscated and obscured: its motives, goals, and root causes, as explained by the jihadis themselves. At Jihad Watch I post on a daily basis news stories showing jihad activity, both violent and stealthy, in the U.S. and worldwide. In my books I explore aspects of the issue in detail, most notably the chief motivating factors named by jihadis themselves: the Qur’an and the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
Rubin: How have your books fit together to portray the broad picture of the issues you are engaging with?
Spencer: In eleven books now I’ve covered the nature of the jihadist challenge to the Free World from a variety of angles. The principal books explore the life of Muhammad, showing why jihadis see him as a model and guide (The Truth About Muhammad); the texts of the Qur’an that incite Muslims to violence and hatred (The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran); the comparative capacity of Christianity and Islam to incite believers to violence (Religion of Peace?); the non-violent initiatives to assert elements of Islamic law in the West (Stealth Jihad); the jihad doctrine and how it is being put into practice in the modern world (Onward Muslim Soldiers). I’ve also written an introduction to the elements of Islam that make it problematic in the West, and a survey of the most celebrated episode of the “clash of civilizations” (The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)), as well as my new book, an examination of the historical value of the writings I explored in The Truth About Muhammmad: Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins.
The person who reads all these books would have, I believe, a comprehensive understanding of the motives and goals of jihadists and Islamic supremacists, as well as of the aspects of Islam that give rise to violence, terror, and supremacism, and the uniqueness of those aspects to Islam itself as compared to other religions.
Tyrkiet vil med i kalifatet – Gary Lane rapporterer:
Country of Concern: Turkey Suppressing Christian Worship
Five years have passed since one of Turkey’s most brutal murders of Christians. Today, there’s concern the country may once again be turning to a more Islamic society… The Christian Broadcasting Network CBN.
Der følger en artikel med:
Country of Concern: Turkey Suppressing Christian Worship
By Gary Lane
On April 18, 2007, three Christians were bound to their chairs, tortured, and stabbed repeatedly at a Bible print shop in Malatya — their throats slit.
Five years have now passed since the Malatya murders, an incident that was perhaps the most tragic and brutal murder of Christians in modern-day Turkey.
Ret godt interview – tilsyneladende kun et par dage gammelt. Intervieweren hedder Nicholas Beecroft:
Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali- Christianity in Complexity. Rejuvenating Democracy, Identity and Authority
Videoen har en lang følgetekst:
Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali is one of the leading figures in the Church of England. He was the 106th Bishop of Rochester, for 15 years which made him the first non-white Diocesan Bishop in the Church of England. Prior to that he had been Bishop of Raiwind in Pakistan, his country of origin where he had a both Christian and Muslim family background. In 1999 he was elevated to the House of Lords. He has a prodigious academic record with much research into the role of Christianity in a pluralistic world, Christian-Muslim relations and on the teaching of Christianity in the modern world. Now he is President of the Oxford Centre for Training, Research, Advocacy and Dialogue. He courageously supports Christian leadership in many parts of the world where Christians suffer persecution.
Bishop Michael really understands the state we are in the Civilisational challenges we face and has the courage to speak the truth in the face of strong social pressure to stick to the Politically Correct hymn sheet.
In this interview, Bishop Michael addresses the State of Western Civilisation; it’s strengths; what’s working really well; the challenges we face. He describes his positive vision for the future- his version of heaven on earth. He believes that we need a spiritual foundation for life and that we are living on past spiritual capital and that Christianity is essential to start regenerating that spiritual capital.
Bishop Michael says what he thinks of being spiritual but not religious- whether or not that is an evolutionary step towards towards a global post-Ethnic pure form of spirituality without cultural and historical baggage. Could it be that the C of E is the first post postmodern religion which provides a lead for the others in recognizing their common path and accommodating all- the first post-postmodern, Integral, Global religion? He sets out his conditions for that to be possible.
He says we need a shared story of who we are, what we believe, our values and history. He tells his version of that story and his own identity. He celebrates the strengths of Britain and talks about how he personally views the history of the British Empire and how we relate to that today. Clearly he sees Christianity as absolutely the central pillar of our history, identity, culture and values.
Bishop MIchael comments upon the muted Western reaction to the persecution of Christians around the world. Why do the Western Elites turn a blind eye?
How do we defend our freedoms, democracy and way of life from those who want to force their authoritarian and absolutist way upon us at a time when the pseudoliberal elite have made it at least taboo if not illegal to engage in debate and assert that Western or British values are better and in any case are our own right in our own country?
What’s needed to sort out gang violence and social decay? How do we restore the healthy authority of a parent, teacher, policeman, doctor etc?
Det er næsten stand-up comedy, det her. Meget katolsk dame. Meget, meget islamkritisk. Om bla. Barnshardts videoer, præsident Obama, finanskrise, valg i USA, kriminalitet, obamacare, medier. Og “Goat humping”. Goat humping? Fra 10. april 2012:
Ann Barnhardt at Liberty On The Rocks
Ann Barnhardt graces the regulars (and irregulars) at Liberty on the Rocks, in Colorado Springs
Opdatering – youtubet 16. april 2012:
BigFurHat’s 99 Second Radio Show – Guest: Ann Barnhardt
Ann Barnhardt joins BigFurHat and does word association and turns down BigFurHat’s marriage proposal.
Opdatering 29. april 2012:
Necrophilia is Not a Joke
Ann Barnhardt – April 26, 2012
Last September I began delivering an hour-long presentation titled “Islamic Sexuality: A Survey of Evil” to local Tea Party, 9/12 and other patriot groups in Colorado. The good folks at FreedomTalkNetcast.com, after seeing this presentation in Pueblo, CO sprang into action and professionally videotaped and edited my next delivery of this lecture in Colorado Springs. It was promptly uploaded to my YouTube channel, “AnnBarnhardt”, in four parts and those four parts can be viewed at the following links:
Der bliver ikke lagt fingre imellem – Feder, når han er bedst:
Obama is the President of some Americans
By Don Feder – April 2, 2012
The Obama presented to voters during the 2008 campaign — the post-racial healer, the leader who could bridge the partisan gap and unite us — was a lie: a carefully crafted façade (complete with fake Greek pillars) to hide a radical determined to remake America in his image.
Obama isn’t the president of the American people, but of his people. Never has a president had more contempt for the majority of those he governs.
He’s the president of aggrieved minorities (and white proponents of “racial justice”), not of Americans who think in terms of justice, not race.
Michael Coren with Robert Spencer: islamic terrorism
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren via Skype to discuss the bombing of a Nigerian church during Easter celebrations by members of the Religion of Peace.
Og en artikel:
Framing Geller and Spencer For Murder
By Robert Spencer – April 09, 2012
Shaima Alawadi, murdered in her home, and for awhile, it was the fault of Pamela Geller and me. A hijab-wearing mother, in death Alawadi quickly became much more prominent than she had ever been in life. Paired with Trayvon Martin, she was made into the symbol of allegedly rampant anti-Muslim bigotry in the U.S., and the impetus for “Hoodie and Hijab” marches that protested the supposed dire predicament of racial and religious minorities in America today. There was only problem with all this handwringing and finger-pointing: Alawadi’s murder was not a hate crime at all.
This revelation Friday morning, along with the release of information that made it look much more likely that Alawadi was a victim of honor killing than of murderous “Islamophobia,” stopped a few of the more circumspect among the Islamic supremacists: the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) tweeted a claim that it had always had doubts about the “hate crime” claim. Islamic supremacist writer Reza Aslan, however, who had initially blamed Pamela Geller and me for the murder, reacted with scornful indifference to the news disproving his claims, and continued to promote Hoodie and Hijab rallies.
Fukuyama har en særegen opfattelse af Danmark, – vi får en ny udlægning hver gang. Islam er lidt af et tabu for Fukuyama, – der skal et spørgsmål til, før det emne kommer op.
Noget af denne forelæsning er hørt før, andet er nyt. Fra AEI den 2. april 2012 – lyden glipper et par sekunder, men bliver straks ordnet:
Hudson Institute, Stonegate Institute, Gatestone Institute. Hvad det så end er, de vil hedde, så laver stedets folk nogle gode artikler. Gatestone Institutes Soeren Kern følger blandt andet islamiseringen af Tyskland:
Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam
by Soeren Kern – January 12, 2012
German authorities have officially confirmed that they are monitoring German-language Internet websites that are critical of Muslim immigration and the Islamization of Europe.
According to Manfred Murck, director of the Hamburg branch of the German domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), his organization is studying whether German citizens who criticize Muslims and Islam on the Internet are fomenting hate and are thus criminally guilty of “breaching” the German constitution.
Muslims Converting Empty European Churches into Mosques
by Soeren Kern – January 16, 2012
Muslims in Europe are increasingly converting empty Christian churches into mosques.
The proliferation of mosques housed in former churches reflects the rise of Islam as the fastest growing religion in post-Christian Europe.
There are now more practicing Muslims than practicing Christians in many parts of Europe, not only in large urban centers, but also in smaller towns and cities across the continent.
As Islam replaces Christianity as the dominant religion in Europe, more and more churches are set to become mosques, which increasingly serve not only as religious institutions but also function as the foundational political building blocks for the establishment of separate, parallel Muslim communities in Europe that are based on Islamic Sharia law.
One of the oldest universities in Germany has opened the country’s first taxpayer-funded department of Islamic theology.
The Center for Islamic Theology at the University of Tübingen was inaugurated on January 16 and is the first of four planned Islamic university centers in Germany.
The German government claims that by controlling the curriculum, the school, which is to train Muslim imams and Islamic religion teachers, will function as an antidote to “hate preachers.”
Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. Denne dom nedenfor må da være en fejl? Den bliver sikkert omstødt:
German Court Bans Muslim Prayers in Schools
by Soeren Kern – December 15, 2011
Germany’s top administrative court has ruled that a Muslim student is not entitled to perform prayers at his school because the act has the potential to create “very severe conflicts.”
Germany’s Federal Administrative Court found that although the right to pray at school is guaranteed by religious freedom under the constitution (Grundgesetz), students lose that right if a conflict is created in the process.
The court also ruled that schools are not obligated to accommodate Muslims by providing them with separate prayer rooms.
Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. Se også Islam versus Europe:
Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.
Fra 10. april 2012:
Seneste kommentarer