Et kuriosum: Den særdeles katolske Ann Barnhardt har en stadigt voksende fanskare. Nu er der lavet en lille tegnefilm med nogle af Ann Barnhardts replikker. Barnhardt er ikke begejstret for Mitt Romney:
Ann Barnhardt blasts Mitt Romney
Watch as Ann gives Mitt a piece of her mind! To find out all about Ann, be sure to visit her You Tube channel
Og Warren Pollock interviewer Barnhardt for fjerde gang. Videoen er delt i to - fra 25. maj 2012:
Facebook
Social or Antisocial networking blocks true-humanistic-contact and relations with people. Do not confuse broadcasting these details with anything else but the culture of self absorption. Additionally you are handing the most intimate details of your life to a “Self Service Spy Ring.” Yes, you are giving the most vulnerable aspects of your life to the Government and the Corporate Oligarchy. You are helping those people working against your best interests. The Soviets dreamed of having an intelligence network of this camera by having local neighborhood spy rings. With Facebook you are doing this disservice to yourself.
Ann Barnhardt, a Constitutional Review w Solutions
Der følger en længere afhandling med, som jeg har sat under videoen. Den yderste højrefløj i USA er noget for sig. Der er ikke rigtig noget bidrag her, som en konservativ på vore breddergradder kan bruge til noget:
We the people of the United States Establish Justice? Totalitarian states are rich in law and short in justice. We live in an age “whereby our rights have been incrementally and consistently destroyed.” Ann Barnhardt; Ann Barnhardt reviews the “Bill of Rights” and the “Constitution” against the realities of the day here in the “First Republic of the United States.” Is it possible that years of legislation and malfeasance, by the corporate oligarchy, has had the effect of ……. Find out about the fate of the United States in this ground breaking interview by Warren Pollock of Ann Barnhardt at her best as an advocate for freedom. Ann and I host our own little “Tea Party,” but not the kind the establishment would want to have.
Lets put a few phrases to the test.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Mr Obama “You don’t need to go to any court to know you cannot be born in two places at once, except the court of logic.” Warren Pollock
Der linkes ivrigt til denne diskussion fra Sean Hannity Show, som er uploadet på YouTube i adskillige eksemplarer. The American Spectator skriver, at Williams er en snob og at Williams skylder Malkin en undskyldning. Den amerikanske justitsminister, Eric Holder, bør gå af, siger Malkin og Hannity. Williams synes ikke, der er noget galt med Obama-administrationen:
Michelle Malkin Slams Juan Williams on WH Leaks Scandal – 6/13/12
Sean Hannity show on 6/13/2012. Michelle Malkin and Juan Williams engage in a heated debate over AG Eric Holder’s appointment of so called, independent investigators into the leak of classified information by the Obama White House.
Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed two U.S. attorneys to investigate leaks of sensitive national security information. In so doing, he implicitly rejected calls by some Republicans for a special prosecutor (sometimes called an “independent counsel”) detached from normal Justice Department oversight. Holder’s decision likely forecloses further debate on the special-prosecutor route. It should not, however, foreclose continued bipartisan concern over the leaks themselves, or pressure from Congress to investigate these serious breaches of the secrecy properly surrounding intelligence activities.
Mere HER hos AEI eller her i The Washington Examiner.
Iran, USA, Finland – det hele er snart et fedt. Dhimmier har ikke flere rettigheder tilbage i Finland. Sandhed er ikke et gyldigt forsvar. Fornærmelsesparathed lurer alle vegne. Så kan man nemlig altid få sin vilje. Endnu et kørt løb. Sagt før og nu igen: vi skal forlade Europa nu. Og man skal ikke tage til USA:
Finland’s War on Free Speech
by Soeren Kern – June 11, 2012
“Stating of facts cannot and must not be criminal, even if they offend someone.” — Jussi Kristian Halla-aho, Finnish blogger convicted of defaming Islam.
Finland’s Supreme Court has found a prominent politician guilty of defaming Islam for “Islamophobic” comments he made on his personal blog.
The ruling represents a major setback for free speech in a Europe that is becoming increasingly stifled by politically correct restrictions on free speech, particularly on issues related to Islam and Muslim immigration.
The Helsinki-based Supreme Court ruled on June 8 that Finns Party MP Jussi Kristian Halla-aho was guilty of “inciting hatred against an ethnic group” for blog posts he made in 2008 which compared Islam to paedophilia, and for sarcastic comments which insinuated that immigrants from Somalia are predisposed to stealing and living off welfare.
Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. Tidligere blogget om Jussi Kristian Halla-aho:
FN og EU er bekymrede. Journalister and bloggere arresteres af sikkerhedsstyrker i Iran: Sahameddin Bourghani, Hassan Fathi, Farshad Ghorbanpour, Ehsan Houshmand, Fatemeh Kheradmand, Saeed Madani, Shahram Manouchehri, Marzieh Rasouli, Arash Sadeghi og Mohammad Soleimani Nia. Der er næsten total medietavshed om situationen. Halalpressen finder vel ikke, at der er noget at kritisere. Mennesker, der korrumperer den islamiske “moral”. Historien passer meget dårligt til “narrativet” hos pressefolk:
Iran arrests journalists, to execute bloggers
by Joel Gehrke – January 26, 2012
Iranian courts have sentenced two bloggers to death for “spreading corruption,” and government security forces have arrested four other journalists, in the lead-up to the nation’s March elections.
“In the past two weeks, security forces have reportedly arrested four journalists,” the U.S. State Department said in a statement, “including Shahram Manouchehri, Sahamedin Bourghani, Parastoo Dokouhaki, and Marzieh Rasouli, and Iranian courts confirmed death sentences for bloggers Saeed Malekpour and Vahid Asghari, both of whom were not accorded due process and now face imminent execution on charges of ‘spreading corruption.’”
Mere HER i The Washington Examiner. Der kan læses mere hos International Freedom of Expression eXchange Network:
Terrordømt venstrefløjser på fri fod udøver chikane imod borgerlige bloggere. Malkin om en sand galning og fænomenet swatting - forbryderen hedder Brett Kimberlin:
Who will protect the freedom to blog?
by Michelle Malkin | June 11, 2012
Free speech is under fire. Online thugs are targeting bloggers (mostly conservative, but not all) who have dared to expose a convicted bomber and perjuring, vexatious litigant who is now enjoying a comfy life as a liberally subsidized social justice operative. Where do your elected representatives stand on this threat to our founding principles?
On Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) bravely stepped forward to press this vital issue. In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, Chambliss decried the “harassing and frightening actions” of Internet menaces who recently have gone after several conservative new media citizen journalists and activists.
Mere HER i The Marietta Daily Journal. National Review Online her. The Paramus Post her. Malkins blog gik i sort i protest:
Going dark to urge congressional action: Who will protect the freedom to blog?
By Michelle Malkin • June 8, 2012
My syndicated column today covers the crucial battle between truth-telling bloggers versus convicted bomber Brett Kimberlin and his band of malicious online thugs. In honor of the National Day of Blogger Silence called by Ace of Spades, this blog is going dark. (UPDATE: See Ace’s manifesto today here. Read Mandy Nagy’s here.) But far from shutting up, I’ll be spending the day calling, e-mailing, and tweeting members of Congress, GOP leaders, journalists, and influencers to ask them what they are doing to defend the First Amendment rights of bloggers. This is a day of action, not inaction. Below my column, I’ll list some contact info for elected officials who need to hear from you. Please join us and act for free speech. Thank you.
Convicted terrorist bomber and perjurer Brett Kimberlin is free while one of his many harassment victims remains under a judicial gag order for the crime of writing about Kimberlin’s violent criminal history. It’s a bizarre situation, as I reported on “The Source” TV show with Ezra Levant.
Kimberlin and his cadre of cyber-stalkers try to bully conservative bloggers into silence. They post personal information and home addresses of their targets to send the message that “we know where you live.”
Audio: Erick Erickson har offentliggjort en mp3 af opringningen til politiet på Red State her. Man finder et interview samme steds, – ligeledes som mp3.
Video om Brett Kimberlin:
Ezra Levant on Brett Kimberlin
This dude’s name has been popping up on a lot of blogs lately.
CNN discusses the Brett Kimberlin swatting cases with Erick Erickson
After Brett Kimberlin was criticized by conservative bloggers, they were targeted with swatting. Swatting is an attempt to trick an emergency service (such as a 9-1-1 dispatcher) into dispatching an emergency response team, usually by spoofing phone numbers over a VOIP system. The name is derived from SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics), one type of such team. Such action places law enforcement and citizens at risk and are criminal actions. In addition it reduces law enforcement officer (LEO) coverage and costs taxpayer money.
Justitsmord:
GBR – Aaron Walker on Kimberlin [5-25-2012]
Blogger Aaron Walker tells Glenn Beck his story on Brett Kimberlin terrorism
Fra Fox News 1. juni 2012 – man kan følge med i en delvis udskrift her hos The Investigative Project on Terrorism:
Steven Emerson: US waging a secret cyber war against Iran – June 1, 2012
Iran: Nuclear program reportedly targeted with sophisticated super virus. Trace Gallagher, Molly Henneberg, Peter Brookes & Steve Emerson on Fox News Studio B. Virus code names: Flame, Stuxnet, Olympic Games.
Jeg vil også lige have denne lidt ældre sag med, – den er slet ikke dårlig. Fra 14. januar 2012 – John Bachman interviewer:
Steve Emerson, National Security Expert – Obama Refuses To Confront Radical Islam
“Laser uranium enrichment is so attractive that that it will be implemented — and Iran will become the test case. What must be demanded is the complete opening of the country to appropriate inspection. Anything else would be too little – much too little.” Hans Ruhle
German nuclear weapons expert Hans Rühle warned in the daily Die Welt May 21 that Iran can enrich uranium using laser technology that is much harder to detect than centrifuges. Rühle headed the German Defense Ministry’s policy planning staff during the 1980s. In a widely-discussed commentary last February 17, he argued that Israel has the capacity to cripple Iran’s nuclear weapons program. He also presented evidence in Die Welt that Iran may have tested a nuclear weapon in North Korea.
“Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadihejad announced in 2010 the ‘good nuclear news’ that Iran then possessed laser technology for uranium enrichment. Iran would not use this technology immediately, Ahmadinejad insisted, but his extremely positive characterization of the new technological option casts strong doubt on Iran’s intentions and suggests that Iran’s voluntary restraint on enrichment is an attempt at diversion,” Rühle wrote in his May 21 analysis.
The White House wants credit for successes but blames Israel for failures, a New York Times exposé shows
By Lee Smith | June 6, 2012
It was quite a week for cyberwarfare. First came the revelation that Iran was suffering from a virus called Flame—apparently the most powerful spyware ever created, turning computers into virtual double-agents—which has already infected at least 1,000 computers, nearly all of them in Iran, the Palestinian territories, Sudan, Syria, and Lebanon.
Lidt udpluk af Sun News TVs seneste – fra 16. maj 2012:
Michael Coren with Clare Lopez: islamic anti-Semitism
“But it is certainly true – if you do look at islamic doctrine, law, and scripture as written – that Jew-hatred – anti-Semitism – is intrinsic, and it is so because of the example of the muslim prophet mohammad. And it began according to the historical record with his conflict with the Jews of the peninsula, which became the Saudi peninsula.”
Michael Coren with Shobhna Kapoor: Keep Omar Khadr out!
After they finish the well-deserved fawning all over Blazing Cat Fur and Five Feet of Fury (“Cat Fur! Cat Fur! Cat Fur!” may very well become the new “Marsha! Marsha! Marsha!”), Michael Coren and activist Shobhna Kapoor discuss the return of terrorist Omar Khadr to Canada and her efforts to stop it.
Fra 14. maj 2012:
Ezra Levant: Iran’s nuclear threat
Ezra Levant and John Robson discuss Iran’s race to acquire nuclear weapons and the cluelessness of those who deny it.
Ezra Levant: Kansas says no to sharia
Uploader har valgt en artikel fra Time Magazine som følgetekst – link her.
Stakelbeck on Terror: Islamization in America (with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller)
CBN News Terrorism Analyst Erick Stakelbeck sits down with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, two leading voices in the fight against Islamization of the West.
Sultan Knish (Daniel Greenfield) paints Israel in 50 years
We read the headlines and each day brings the news that Israel appears to be standing over an abyss, between terrorism, nuclear weapons, international delegitimization, social problems and a host of other challenges, it’s not unreasonable to wonder whether Israel will survive.
But to look back at Israel’s history is to recognize that its situation has always been precarious, that it has always faced existential challenges that seemed on the verge of tearing it apart.
Israel has faced destruction time and time again, and while today’s threats are of a different character than in the past, they are a continuation of a small country’s long struggle against the historical imperatives of the West and the East.
Israel exists in defiance of history. In defiance of Longfellow’s exclamation in The Jewish Cemetery at Newport that, “What once has been shall be no more”. It is predictably unpredictable. There is no one set future for the Jewish state, only many possible futures.
On March 20, 2012, Daniel Greenfield, the inimitable blogger Sultan Knish – explored these possible futures, both the good and the bad, in relation to the trends in Israel and the world. Through these possible futures we began to see whether the Jewish state will be able to defy the prediction in Longfellow’s poem or whether it will once again become a Jewish cemetery.
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren to discuss his latest book, Did Muhammad Exist?
Desuden dette interview:
An Interview with Robert Spencer
by Barry Rubin – April 26, 2012
Spencer: What is the basic aim of the Jihad Watch site and of your books?
Spencer: The aim of all my work is to alert the public in the United States and around the world about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, with particular attention to the aspect of the threat that has been most obfuscated and obscured: its motives, goals, and root causes, as explained by the jihadis themselves. At Jihad Watch I post on a daily basis news stories showing jihad activity, both violent and stealthy, in the U.S. and worldwide. In my books I explore aspects of the issue in detail, most notably the chief motivating factors named by jihadis themselves: the Qur’an and the example of Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
Rubin: How have your books fit together to portray the broad picture of the issues you are engaging with?
Spencer: In eleven books now I’ve covered the nature of the jihadist challenge to the Free World from a variety of angles. The principal books explore the life of Muhammad, showing why jihadis see him as a model and guide (The Truth About Muhammad); the texts of the Qur’an that incite Muslims to violence and hatred (The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran); the comparative capacity of Christianity and Islam to incite believers to violence (Religion of Peace?); the non-violent initiatives to assert elements of Islamic law in the West (Stealth Jihad); the jihad doctrine and how it is being put into practice in the modern world (Onward Muslim Soldiers). I’ve also written an introduction to the elements of Islam that make it problematic in the West, and a survey of the most celebrated episode of the “clash of civilizations” (The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)), as well as my new book, an examination of the historical value of the writings I explored in The Truth About Muhammmad: Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins.
The person who reads all these books would have, I believe, a comprehensive understanding of the motives and goals of jihadists and Islamic supremacists, as well as of the aspects of Islam that give rise to violence, terror, and supremacism, and the uniqueness of those aspects to Islam itself as compared to other religions.
Fra Russia Today den 23. april 2012 – den anden deltager er kommunist og hedder Slavoj Zizek:
David Horowitz on World Tomorrow with Julian Assange
Julian Assange’s The World Tomorrow: Hassan Nasrallah
Hezbollah urged the Syrian opposition to engage in dialogue with Assad’s regime, but they refused. Hezbollah leader Sayyid Nasrallah confirmed this in his first interview in 6 years, the world premiere of Julian Assange’s ‘The World Tomorrow’ on RT.
Assange får kritik for sine programmer, – også fra venstrefløjen. Fra 24. april 2012:
Assange’s mainstream friends U-turn after show boom
The media that once praised Julian Assange, hailing him a hero for his work as a whistleblower, has now drastically changed its tune, after the debut of his talk show on RT. While some say it’s due to journalistic jealousy, others believe the U-turn is political. Laura Smith reports from London.
Russia Today har før haft Horowitz som gæst – fra 24. november 2010:
Will profiling make us safer?
Following outrage over TSA screenings, GOP Reps. Chaffetz And Hoekstra revived calls for profiling, Thom talks to David Horowitz about this.Following outrage over TSA screenings, GOP Reps. Chaffetz And Hoekstra revived calls for profiling, Thom talks to David Horowitz about this.
The Wichita Eagle har lige haft en artikel om en ny episode:
Der kommer hele tiden rapporter om valgsvindel i USA, sære Acorn aktiviteter, ligesom der er en lind strøm af beretninger, der fortæller at præsident Obama er endnu mere rød end ellers antaget. Anita Moncrief beretter om alle tre dele:
Anita Moncrief at C-PAC
Part 1 of Anita Moncrief’s speech at Americans For Prosperity Foundation’s Suite Tea Breakfast with Andrew Breitbart in Orlando, Florida, September 23, 2011.
Part 2 of Anita Moncrief’s speech at Americans For Prosperity Foundation’s Suite Tea Breakfast with Andrew Breitbart in Orlando, Florida, September 23, 2011.
Kim Møller fra Uriasposten har valgt: “Jeg prioriterer min integritet langt højere end en akademisk karriere. Så skulle jeg begynde at snakke folk efter munden, og det duer jeg slet ikke til.”
Han kritiserer islam, jager venstrefløjen og føler sig som en fri mand. Sappho har mødt manden, der fravalgte en akademisk karriere til fordel for Uriasposten, Danmarks mest læste blog.
Mere HER i Sappho. Sappho følger retssagen i Norge:
Steyn og Coren hyggesnakker en del her, men der kommer også lidt seriøs tale. Blandt andet kommer de ind på indavl, – fætter-kusineægteskaber. Jo flere gange, det bliver sagt højt, jo bedre. Måske ender det en dag med, at denne muslimske tragedie kan blive bragt til ophør via forbud.
Michael Coren with Mark Steyn: April 16, 2012
Mark Steyn is in studio with Michael Coren, gearing up for Steynamite next week.
Og lidt af de gode videoer fra canadiske Sun News TV, som betænksomme mennesker har uploadet på YouTube i ugens løb. Fra 13. april 2012:
Ezra Levant: Bras, burkas, and Saudi “art critics”
An art student who wears Muslim headdress is defending her right to freedom of expression after a photo she snapped was removed from public display at a British Columbia university.
Jonathan Halevi’s Arab Underground – Apr 11, 2012
Evidently there was an Everybody Draw Mohammad Day in Tunisia. Who knew?
Fra 11. april 2012:
Michael Coren with muslim atheist Kacem El Ghazzali
Kacem El Ghazzali is a muslim atheist (a “devert?”) who warns about the dangers of islam. You’ll never guess how in-bred paranoid islam has responded.
Daniel Greenfield (aka blogger “Sultan Knish”) on “The Chai95 Radio Hour” (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)
Blogger Daniel Greenfield (aka “Sultan Knish”; sultanknish.blogspot.com) talks with “Chai95 Radio Hour” host Adam Taxin and co-host Bob Guzzardi about suicidal Jewish liberals and Passover; the Left’s hijacking of Judaism; the mainstreaming of J Street; debt slavery; the Left’s effort to make symbols out of the death of Trayvon Martin; Trayvon Martin and “The Big Book Of American Racism”; Official Black America’s indifference to massacres of African Christians; how countries descend into chaos; and other topics.
Det slår aldrig fejl. Hvert år efter Trykkefrihedsselskabets generalforsamling kommer der et surt opstød i Weekendavisen forfattet af Leif Blædel. Man kan næsten sætte uret efter det.
Michael Coren & Robert Spencer: The fight against islamofascism
Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch joins Michael Coren to discuss the clear and present danger of islam in the West.
Fed opsang her – fra 31. marts 2012:
Michael Coren: Shut up!
The March 31, 2012 of Michael Coren’s occasional “Shut Up!” feature.
Og tilbage til Spencer:
The Empire of Fear
By Robert Spencer – March 26, 2012
As I wrote last week, Muslim and non-Muslim analysts often tell us that Muslims hate the West for its decadence, its immorality, its lasciviousness, which they contrast unfavorably with the supposed morality and uprightness of the Islamic world. Often this boils down to a Muslim critique of Western “freedom,” especially as Bush and Obama pursued military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan ostensibly to bring Western-style freedom to those countries.
In line with that, the Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali, once complained that “Australian law guarantees freedoms up to a crazy level.” Yet genuine freedom is an indispensable prerequisite for any cultivation of real virtue. Even the post-Christian West makes it more possible to be virtuous than the apparently much more straitlaced Islamic world. With its stonings, amputations, death penalties for an array of offenses including apostasy, Islam has created not a framework in which people can become genuinely good, but an empire of fear. People don’t dare step out of line, not out of an authentic understanding that the path of moral and ethical uprightness is preferable to the alternative, much less out of love for God or a real desire to please him, but because they are afraid of what would happen to them if they did depart from Islam’s vision of morality.
Every time a Muslim commits murder in the name of Islam, the denial begins again: Western leaders and the mainstream media tie themselves into knots trying to explain what happened without making any reference to its guiding motivation.
Last week was no different: Muhammad Merah was a self-styled “Islamic warrior” who killed a rabbi and several children at a Jewish day school in Toulouse, France, in an attack that the international media widely reported initially as having been perpetrated by a neo-Nazi. When it became clear that Merah was actually a jihadist, the predictable denial began: French President Nicolas Sarkozy said that the attack had nothing to do with Islam, and the call echoed worldwide not to allow the murders to harm French “pluralism.”
Wegman’s, a supermarket in Rochester, New York, has set up a special checkout line for a hijab-wearing Muslim cashier, directing customers to go to other lines if they have pork or alcohol.
Islamic law forbids Muslims not just to eat, but to handle or sell pork or alcohol, and Wegman’s customers seemed happy to go along. One said, “I feel like if they’re going to hire her and she’s got to have the job, why shouldn’t we respect her. Just go to another cashier.” Another added: “I would respect her beliefs and go to the next line if I had alcohol.”
Robert Spencer interviews Nicolai Sennels: “Muslims are taught to be aggressive, insecure, irresponsible and intolerant”
By Robert Spencer on April 2, 2012
Nicolai Sennels regularly contributes to Jihad Watch, with articles on psychology and translations of Scandinavian and German news. To help you get to know Sennels better, we decided to do an interview.
Nicolai Sennels (born 1976) is a Danish psychologist. His first appearances in the Danish media concerned his unorthodox therapy methods that he developed as the only psychologist at Sønderbro, the youth prison (see here, here, here, here and here). He taught the young prisoners about mindfulness meditation and developed a special program on anger management. Sennels also developed a psychotherapeutic method that focused on teaching criminals with a low understanding of emotions and empathy how to take responsibility for their own behavior. In 2008, the prisoners of Sønderbro voted the facility as the best prison in Denmark. The leader of Social Services in the Copenhagen municipality concluded that this was due to the work of Nicolai Sennels (Amagerbladet, November 3, 2008).
CAIR Blocks Discussion of Islam – But Only Temporarily
by IPT News • Apr 5, 2012
Efforts by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to squash a lecture by writer Robert Spencer have been thwarted.
Spencer originally planned to speak April 18 at the New York law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel about his forthcoming book, Did Muhammad Exist? The talk was sponsored by the Middle East Forum (MEF), headed by Daniel Pipes.
CAIR issued an action alert March 29 calling on the firm to rescind its invitation, claiming the event would promote “Spencer’s claim that Islam’s Prophet Muhammad may never have existed.” Spencer’s book is based on his review of the 130-year scholarly tradition that raises fundamental questions
Mere HER hos The Investigative Project on Terrorism.
½½This week’s guest is Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center who is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century. Visit his blog at sultanknish.blogspot.com.
Hudson Institute, Stonegate Institute, Gatestone Institute. Hvad det så end er, de vil hedde, så laver stedets folk nogle gode artikler. Gatestone Institutes Soeren Kern følger blandt andet islamiseringen af Tyskland:
Germany Attempts to Silence Criticism of Islam
by Soeren Kern – January 12, 2012
German authorities have officially confirmed that they are monitoring German-language Internet websites that are critical of Muslim immigration and the Islamization of Europe.
According to Manfred Murck, director of the Hamburg branch of the German domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV), his organization is studying whether German citizens who criticize Muslims and Islam on the Internet are fomenting hate and are thus criminally guilty of “breaching” the German constitution.
Muslims Converting Empty European Churches into Mosques
by Soeren Kern – January 16, 2012
Muslims in Europe are increasingly converting empty Christian churches into mosques.
The proliferation of mosques housed in former churches reflects the rise of Islam as the fastest growing religion in post-Christian Europe.
There are now more practicing Muslims than practicing Christians in many parts of Europe, not only in large urban centers, but also in smaller towns and cities across the continent.
As Islam replaces Christianity as the dominant religion in Europe, more and more churches are set to become mosques, which increasingly serve not only as religious institutions but also function as the foundational political building blocks for the establishment of separate, parallel Muslim communities in Europe that are based on Islamic Sharia law.
One of the oldest universities in Germany has opened the country’s first taxpayer-funded department of Islamic theology.
The Center for Islamic Theology at the University of Tübingen was inaugurated on January 16 and is the first of four planned Islamic university centers in Germany.
The German government claims that by controlling the curriculum, the school, which is to train Muslim imams and Islamic religion teachers, will function as an antidote to “hate preachers.”
Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. Denne dom nedenfor må da være en fejl? Den bliver sikkert omstødt:
German Court Bans Muslim Prayers in Schools
by Soeren Kern – December 15, 2011
Germany’s top administrative court has ruled that a Muslim student is not entitled to perform prayers at his school because the act has the potential to create “very severe conflicts.”
Germany’s Federal Administrative Court found that although the right to pray at school is guaranteed by religious freedom under the constitution (Grundgesetz), students lose that right if a conflict is created in the process.
The court also ruled that schools are not obligated to accommodate Muslims by providing them with separate prayer rooms.
Mere HER hos Gatestone Institute. Se også Islam versus Europe:
25 år for Danmark – Et interview med Ole Hasselbalch
25 år for Danmark – Et interview med Ole Hasselbalch. Omhandlende foreningens virke gennem årene og den politiske situation i dagens Danmark.
Interviewer; Harry Vinter – Den Danske Forening
I 1983 åbnede Folketinget grænserne. Mange advarede – men forgæves. Resultatet var en fremmed-invasion uden sidestykke. Fire år senere skabtes så på tværpolitisk grundlag Den Danske Forening med det formål “på folkestyrets grund, uafhængigt af økonomiske og politiske interesser at sikre dansk kultur, sprog og levevis”.
Et klart mønster tegner sig. Konservative medier får etiketten ‘højreorienteret’, hvorimod venstreorienterede får ‘uafhængig’, ‘velanset’ eller ‘troværdig’.
Seneste kommentarer