Geert Wilders mordtruet

Sharia4Belgium. Sharia4Holland. Sharia4hvemsomhelst. Mordtrusler imod Geert Wilders – gerningsmand arresteret. Det efterhånden helt venstreekstremistiske Radio Netherlands Worldwide spørger om Sharia4Holland er en børnebande eller en terrortrussel. RNW er et af de mest syge medier, Europa har. Video:

Sharia4Belgium Threatens To Kill Geert Wilders, Demands Sharia For All

Sharia4Holland lashes out

Geert Wilders filed a complaint, according to the police. On Friday a speaker [for Sharia4Holland] on the Dam in Amsterdam called Wilders “this dog of the Romans” with whom “we will deal with” once The Netherlands has become a Muslim state. Also he advised to take warning “from the case Theo van Gogh”.

Sharia4Holland wants to implement sharia law in The Netherlands.

Police in Amsterdam-Amstelland and the public prosecutor started on Saturday their investigation of statements made by members of Shariah4Holland.

Earlier, on Sunday, VVD faction leader in Amsterdam Robert Flos critiqued the police for their performance [rather the lack of] during that speech at the National Monument. On AT5 TV station he said it was strange that the police did not act when speakers made death threats towards Wilders, which according to Flos [and the law] is a criminal offense.

The police did arrest a bystander, who tried to act. They rough-handed him while taking him away. Flos said he was shocked that “next to our monument such a message of un-freedom is preached”. According to AT5, Flos will ask questions of Mayor Eberhard van der Laan.

Man ser også Anjem Choudary fra Islam4UK tilsidst:

Opdateret.

Andre kilder: DutchNews, Radio Netherlands Worldwide, Jewish News One, Radio Netherlands Worldwide, The Irish Times, Gatestone Institute,

Mark Steyn om Geert Wilders

Steyn har skrevet forordet til Wilders’ nye bog:

The Spirit of Geert Wilders

By Mark Steyn – May 14, 2012

A foreword to Wilders’ Marked for Death.

When I was asked to write a foreword to Geert Wilders’ new book, my first reaction, to be honest, was to pass. Mr. Wilders lives under 24/7 armed guard because significant numbers of motivated people wish to kill him, and it seemed to me, as someone who’s attracted more than enough homicidal attention over the years, that sharing space in these pages was likely to lead to an uptick in my own death threats. Who needs it? Why not just plead too crowded a schedule and suggest the author try elsewhere? I would imagine Geert Wilders gets quite a lot of this.

And then I took a stroll in the woods, and felt vaguely ashamed at the ease with which I was willing to hand a small victory to his enemies. After I saw off the Islamic enforcers in my own country, their frontman crowed to The Canadian Arab News that, even though the Canadian Islamic Congress had struck out in three different jurisdictions in their attempt to criminalize my writing about Islam, the lawsuits had cost my magazine (he boasted) two million bucks, and thereby “attained our strategic objective — to increase the cost of publishing anti-Islamic material.” In the Netherlands, Mr. Wilders’ foes, whether murderous jihadists or the multicultural establishment, share the same “strategic objective” — to increase the cost of associating with him beyond that which most people are willing to bear. It is not easy to be Geert Wilders. He has spent almost a decade in a strange, claustrophobic, transient, and tenuous existence little different from kidnap victims or, in his words, a political prisoner. He is under round-the-clock guard because of explicit threats to murder him by Muslim extremists.

Mere HER i National Review Online. AINA her.

• Desuden kan man se et ret godt interview med Wilders hos The Daily Caller her.

Andre kilder: The Guardian,

Skandanistan

Det sted ligger jo her:

The Road to Skandanistan

Edward Cline – February 21, 2012

One shouldn’t wonder much about why Norway, Sweden, and Demark are willing to submit, like “Britainistan,” without so much as an audible whimper, to their steady Islamization, to their becoming de facto departments of a growing international caliphate. All three countries are welfare states that welcomed Muslim immigrants by the planeload over the decades to perform the work which entitlement-obsessed and welfare benefits-seduced Scandinavians no longer wished to perform. “Islamophobes” they were not. And still aren’t, even though their skyrocketing crime rates are directly attributable to immigrant and second-generation Muslims.

All three countries are governed by leftist elites, by political parties that redistribute other people’s money and spread the wealth around a lot. The Left has made an alliance with Islam, which wants to spread its creed around across the board and impose its ideology on non-Muslims by guile or force. There are, however, two camps of the Left. There is the Left that hates the West as much as do the Muslims, and will do anything to destroy it, even if it means its own dhimmitude and demise under Sharia law and submission. One could not imagine another group in that part of the globe more dedicated to the destruction of their own country. “We will be multicultural and non-judgmental, even if it means our own deaths. It is the right thing to do. We will be virtuous, even if it means accepting penance for our culture being superior to Islamic culture.”

Mere HER hos Family Security Matters.

It’s Those Damned Danes Again

Nick Cohen – March 2012

It is a statement of the obvious to say that since the Ancient Greeks writers have known that the powerful are more dramatic than the rest of us. You do not need me to tell you that their decisions can improve or destroy individuals or nations; that what leaders do with power shows their character in the clearest light, and teaches the rest of us hard truths about human nature. Someone needs to tell the controllers of television, however. Their disdain for politics in part explains the collapse of British TV drama from world leader to also-ran.

Media managers still commission excellent one-off drama-documentaries — Peter Morgan’s films about the Blair years, for instance. But drama series come from the classics, or the tired detective genre or feel-good scripts written by and for Middle England because editors lack the imaginative intelligence to see their society in the round.

Mere HER i Standpoint Magazine.

Andre kilder: Document.no,

Video: Mark Steyn ad libitum

Man skal indtil C-Span for at se video:

In Depth with Mark Steyn

C-SPAN | BookTV | Feb 5, 2012

Author and columnist Mark Steyn talked about topics such as American culture, free speech, terrorism, the economy, and the worldwide demographic shift to Muslims. He responded to telephone calls and electronic commmunications.

Mark Steyn is a regular guest host of Rush Limbaugh’s radio show, a visiting fellow in journalism at Hillsdale College, and the author of nine books: Broadway Babies Say Goodnight: Musicals Then and Now (1997); The Face of the Tiger: And Other Tales from the New War (2002); From Head to Toe: An Anatomical Anthology (2004); America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It (2006); Mark Steyn’s Passing Parade: Obituaries & Appreciations (2006); Mark Steyn’s American Songbook (2008); A Song for the Season (2008); Lights Out: Islam, Free Speech and the Twilight of the West (2009); After America: Get Ready for Armageddon (2011).

Startes HER – åbner C-Spans hjemmeside – værten hedder Peter Slen. Varighed 2 timer og 56 minutter.

Uploadet 6. februar 2012:

Mark Steyn The Undocumented Anchorman Fills In For Rush Limbaugh On Post Super Bowl Sunday

Mark Steyn In For Rush Giving His Take Of The Clint Eastwood Halftime In America Ad

Mark Steyn In For Rush Giving Us Breaking News On Dead Zulu Singer Held Hostage By Zombies

Bruce Bawer om hunde, pressen, æresdrab, Norge og mere

Bawer er meget energisk for tiden. Herligt med noget kvalificeret læsestof:

Normalizing the Kingston Honor Killings

by Bruce Bawer on Feb 1st, 2012

Last month, after the Costa Concordia fiasco in Livorno, Gregoria De Falco – the port official who ordered the cartoonishly cowardly captain, Francesco Schettino, to get back on his ship and aid in the rescue effort – became an instant hero.  But De Falco’s wife dissented, saying it was “ridiculous” to call her husband a hero.  “The worrying thing,” she said, “is that people like my husband who simply do their duty every day, immediately become idols, personalities, heroes in this country. That is not normal.”

Wise lady.  But it’s not only in Italy, these days, that some people are awed when others simply do their duty.  Take last Sunday’s guilty verdicts in the Kingston, Ontario, honor-killing case.  On June 30, 2009, as Stephen Brown recounted here the other day, three teenage sisters and their father’s first wife were found dead in a car in the Rideau Canal.  Three weeks later, police arrested the girls’ father, Afghani-born real-estate tycoon Mohammad Shafia, their mother, Tooba Mohammad Yahya, and their brother, Hamed. All three have now been handed 25-year prison sentences for first-degree murder.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Reporters Without Credibility

by Bruce Bawer on Jan 30th, 2012

Founded in 1985, Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), also known as Reporters Without Borders, professes to be motivated by a profound devotion to freedom of expression.  The organization has apparently done good work on behalf of journalists in countries like Cuba and China, where press freedom simply doesn’t exist.  But RSF also issues an annual Press Freedom Index – the latest was released just the other day – in which it purports to rank countries according to the degree of freedom their journalists enjoy.  Let’s just say that the list doesn’t represent RSF at its finest.

As someone who frequently slams the New York Times, I’m glad to be able to say that Times reporter Andrew Rosenthal, writing about RSF’s new list last week, summoned precisely the right word to describe it: “ridiculous.” As Rosenthal put it: “Like US News & World Report with colleges, they freshen the list each year based on new developments, and – again like US News – they sometimes end up with a pecking-order that doesn’t quite mesh with reality.”

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Banning Dogs as Pets

by Bruce Bawer on Feb 7th, 2012

This is how it happens, folks.  Little by little.  Law by law.  The proponents of sharia get themselves elected to positions of power – and then, before too long, they start trying to subject the rest of us to it, bit by bit:

Hasan Küçük, Hague councilor for the Islam Democrats, says dogs should be banned as pets in the city, reports De Telegraaf. The Muslim party says that the animals belong in nature, not inside the house. Küçük says that keeping dogs is animal abuse and should therefore be criminalized.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. AINA her.

After the Oslo Massacre, an Assault on Free Speech

Norway’s left seeks to silence Islam’s critics by linking them to a mass murderer.

By Bruce Bawer – February 7, 2012

Last July 22, a powerful explosion rocked a government building in downtown Oslo, killing eight people. Later that day, 69 people, mostly teenagers, were shot to death by a lone gunman at a Labor Party camp on the nearby island of Utøya. By nightfall, police had a suspect in custody: a 32-year-old Norwegian named Anders Behring Breivik, who had apparently carried out both attacks on his own.

Contrary to nearly everyone’s original assumption that Islamic terrorists were behind the Oslo attack, a 1,500-page “manifesto” by Breivik showed that he opposed the mass immigration of Muslims into Norway and had targeted the Labor Party gathering because of the party’s role in shaping the country’s multicultural immigration policy.

Prøv først via Google News HER. Ellers her i The Wall Street Journal. Måske virker et af disse link – artiklen er låst inde – her eller her.

Nyårshilsen fra Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

I Will Remain Steadfast!

January 1, 2012

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff sends the following New Year’s message to everyone who has supported her over the last two years.

Dear Friends,

As many of you know, Sunday December 20 was a dark day for freedom of speech.

The Austrian justice system decided that the truth may not be spoken if it is deemed “excessive” (nota bene: and thus “denigrating” from the point of view of pious Muslims). Although the verdict was shocking, it did not come as a surprise.

Before I continue with my thoughts about the impact and implications of the ruling, I want to thank a few people:

Mere HER hos In Defence of Free Speech.

Bruce Bawer om Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Pressen ignorerer dommen i Østrig:

Unfit to Print

by Bruce Bawer on Dec 29th, 2011

The other day I took note here of a recent New York Times feature in which several prominent figures from the worlds of law and religion were invited to answer the question: Is religious freedom in America under threat?  I focused on one of the responses, entitled “A Campaign Against Patriotic Muslims,” in which Salam Al-Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, maintained that when it came to his coreligionists, the answer was a definite yes.  Al-Marayati painted a picture of an America awash in “anti-Islam groups” and “Muslim haters” who make life difficult for American Muslims, whom he depicted as overwhelmingly peaceful, freedom-loving, and terrorism-hating.  It didn’t seem to matter to the Times that Al-Marayati himself is a longtime associate of and apologist for terrorists.

Another participant in the same Times feature was Noah Feldman​, a Harvard law professor.  Like Al-Marayati, Feldman claimed to be concerned about a plague of Islam-hatred in America.  Feldman complained about legislative proposals in Oklahoma and Tennessee that would “ban Islamic law from the courts — a measure that the American separation of church and state makes completely unnecessary.”  Feldman concluded: “It would be nice to say these proposed laws are un-American. But they are sadly reminiscent of our history of targeting vulnerable religious minorities out of bigotry and political expediency. We can only look forward to a day when anti-Islamic sentiment seems as archaic as these other old hatreds do today.”

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Denigrating Religious Stupidity

25 December 2011 – Henrik R. Clausen

While I was working on a polite essay ”What is ‘denigration’, really?”, events overtook the intended polite and analytical approach. At an Austrian court, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff had her conviction for ”Denigrating the teachings of a recognized religion” upheld. The court deemed that her uttering ”an excess of opinion” about Muhammad having sex with minors, and that doing so was subject to a fine of 480 euros, alternatively 60 days in jail.

Many of us consider freedom of expression is a fundamental right in itself. Expressions used in criminal ways, like committing fraud or inciting violence is indeed a matter for the courts, but a victimless crime where not even a single Muslim protested that his faith had been ‘denigrated’, surely cannot be subject to legal action, fines or jail time. In a free society, that is.

Mere HER hos Right Side News.

Video: Nina Shea & Paul Marshall hos The Heritage Foundation

Fra 9. november 2011 - solidt arbejde af Shea & Marshall:

Silenced: How Apostasy and Blasphemy Codes are Choking Freedom Worldwide

The 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie awakened many westerners to the danger of being charged with blasphemy in the Muslim world. Charges of “blasphemy,” “apostasy,” and “insulting Islam” are increasingly used by authoritarian governments and extremist forces within key Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) member states to acquire and consolidate power. These codes have proved effective in intimidating not only converts and heterodox groups, but also political and religious reformers.

In their newly released book, Silenced (Oxford University Press, 2011), Paul Marshall and Nina Shea provide the first survey of such accusations in the contemporary Muslim world, in international organizations, and in the West. These charges traditionally carry a punishment of death but are contested within Islam today, as described by the late Indonesian president Abdurrahman Wahid in the foreword to Silenced. Nevertheless, as Marshall and Shea describe, hundreds of victims, including political dissidents, religious reformers, journalists, writers, artists, movie makers, and religious minorities in many countries. They also document the political effects in Muslim societies of blasphemy and apostasy laws, as well as non-governmental fatwas and vigilante violence. And they examine in the West the move toward importing new blasphemy standards through bans on purported hate speech and Islamophobia, aggressively promoted by the OIC, and the increasing threat of violence to stifle commentary on Islam even in the absence of law.

Audio & artikler om justitsmordet på Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Ned May fra Gates of Vienna kommer ind i udsendelsen efter 15 minutter og fortæller om sagen imod Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. Fra Secure Freedom Radio den 22. december 2011:

Time To Stand Up For What America Stands For

With Nina Shea, Ned May, Diana West, and Clare Lopez

Are we failing to understand the nature of our enemies and blinding ourselves to the threats that they pose?  Today’s guests address this issue beginning with Nina Shea of the Center for Religious Freedom at the Hudson Institute.  Nina first explains the situation in Egypt where the Muslim Brotherhood is not being open about its agenda for the new Egyptian government.  It is likely though that broad restrictions and punishments for any expression against Islam will continue to be instituted.  These will target women, religious minorities, and political reformers, and further hinder the discussion about freedom of speech in Egypt by essentially taking it off the table.  This perverse agenda is only being exacerbated here in theUnited Stateswith the recent State Department conference with the Organization for Islamic Cooperation.

Ned May, blogger at the Gates of Vienna and Big Piece contributor, addresses the issue of Sharia law. Court cases inEuropehave proven that Sharia law is being upheld and thus the question is can the imposition of Sharia happen here too?  InAustria, an activist by the name of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff has been found guilty of hate speech.  Her case highlights the point that Muslims can defame Christians and Jews without facing prosecution, but under Sharia law all other faiths are prosecuted for exposing Islam.  Similarly in theUnited Kingdom, the courts have upheld Sharia law by forcing a Muslim mother to give her child up for adoption in order to prevent the mother’s father from carrying out honor killings.  It appears that Sharia law is taking precedent over the common law of European countries.

Next Diana West, columnist at the Washington Examiner and author of The Death of the Grown-Up, examines how the doctrine of Sharia law is being enforced in theUnited States.  This submission to Sharia doctrine stems fromUS counterinsurgency doctrine in which our goal over the years has been to convince the Islamic people, inAfghanistan for example, that we are the “good guys”.  Unfortunately this concept has led to increased sensitivity to and accommodation for Islamic norms and practices that have saturated our military training.  This has also led to directives such as at the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) that dictate adherence to Islamic law and provide a means for the regulation of American freedoms.

Today’s show concludes with Clare Lopez, Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Policy and former CIA intelligence officer.  Clare explains some recent court cases and documents that point to the connection between the Iranian government and Al-Qaeda.  First, a judge ruled in favor of several family members of 9-11 victims because of proven evidence thatIranand Hezbollah provided support to Al-Qaeda for the terrorist attacks.  Law firms have joined together to assemble evidence that show this connection too.  TheU.S.people have a right to know the truth about 9-11 and theU.S.government has the responsibility to hold these members ofIran’s political leadership accountable for their actions.

Startes HER eller her - åbner Windows Media Player. Varighed 53 minutter.

The Persecution of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

by Jamie Glazov on Dec 26th, 2011

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a free speech activist who was charged last year in Austria with “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” for asserting that “Mohammed had a thing for little girls.” In February of this year she was convicted, and will have to pay a fine of up to €480. Just recently, on December 20, 2011, her conviction was upheld by the higher court. If she refuses to pay the fine, she may spend a maximum of two months in jail. She grew up and lived in Muslim countries and experienced Islam first-hand.

FP: Ms. Sabaditsch-Wolff, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

I would like to talk to you today about your trial and where it stands now. But let us begin with a bit of background about yourself.

Sabaditsch-Wolff: Thank you Jamie.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

A New ‘Silent Night’ Descends on Austria

Dec 23, 2011 – Diana West

Ah, to be in Vienna at Yuletide. Streets sparkle with the lights of the Christkindlmarkts, the traditional markets that spring up for the season. Skaters circle the rink outside the picturesque Rathaus (City Hall). Merrymakers warm their hands on cups of gluhwein (mulled wine). What could possibly be missing?

Freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech no longer exists in Austria, as definitively proven by the Vienna high court. This week, a judge upheld the conviction against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff on the following charge: “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion.” In simplest terms, this means that Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff speaks the truth about Islam, and in Austria, as in other nations across the Western world currently transitioning to sharia (Islamic law), speaking the truth about Islam is not tolerated, and, more and more, is against the law.

Mere HER hos Townhall. Kan også læses her hos WorldNetDaily.

“A Black Day for Austria”

by Soeren Kern – December 26, 2011

An Austrian appellate court has upheld the conviction of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a Viennese housewife and anti-Jihad activist, for “denigrating religious beliefs” after giving a series of seminars about the dangers of radical Islam.

The December 20 ruling shows that while Judaism and Christianity can be disparaged with impunity in postmodern multicultural Austria, speaking the truth about Islam is subject to swift and hefty legal penalties.

Although the case has major implications for freedom of speech in Austria, as well as in Europe as a whole, it has received virtually no press coverage in the American mainstream media.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.

Andre kilder: The New English Review, EuropeNews, In Defence of Free Speech, Geert Wilders Weblog,

Video: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff & Michael Coren

Midt i juletravlheden skal vi lige have denne med:

Michael Coren with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

By the time the verdict was handed down, it had become obvious that the court was absolutely determined that Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff must be found guilty of something. The playing of the tapes — which showed that many of the recorded statements that had been used against Elisabeth had in fact been uttered privately — made the prosecution realize that the original charge would never hold up. To attain the desired outcome, the judge added a second charge of her own devising. A juridical move of this sort would have been unimaginable (and illegal) in the United States and many other countries, but it is quite legal in Austria.

The charge on which Elisabeth was eventually convicted was ludicrous on the face of it. Not only did she never say that Muhammad’s actions constituted “pedophilia”, but Muhammad’s actions — which were undisputed by the court — included having sex with a nine-year-old girl. If she had said what she was accused of, it would have been nothing more than the simple truth, and unexceptional from the standpoint of any normal person.

But the folks who run the Austrian system of “justice” are not normal people. They concocted the absurd rationalization that remaining married to the little girl past the age of 18 meant that Muhammad did not exclusively target children with his sexual attentions; hence he was not a “pedophile” by the strict psychiatric definition. Thus Elisabeth was wrong, even though she did not say it, and even though no ordinary citizen would disagree with her if she had said it. Interestingly enough, this farrago of justice was made possible by the recognition of Islam as a state religion in 1912 through the law Islamgesetz, which had as itsprimary purpose the full integration of Bosnia-Herzegovina into the Austrian Empire. When Austria lost Bosnia in 1918, the law became irrelevant, but it has remained on the books until this day.

Video: Jacob Mchangama, Naser Khader, Bruce Bawer, Mark Durie, Nina Shea og flere

Fra The Federalist Society den 4. november 2011 – Naser Khader skal for øvrigt arbejde for Hudson Institute, skriver The Copenhagen Post. Nå, video:

Silenced: How Apostasy and Blasphemy Codes are Choking Freedom Worldwide

• Paul Marshall, Senior Fellow, Center for Religious Freedom, Hudson Institute
• Nina Shea, Director and Senior Fellow, Center for Religious Freedom, Hudson Institute
• Jonathan Bunch, Vice President & Director of State Courts, The Federalist Society

The Muslim World

• Prof. David F. Forte, Cleveland State University, Cleveland-Marshall School of Law
• Amjad Mahmood Khan, Attorney and National Director of Public Affairs, Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA
• Jacob Mchangama, Director of Legal Affairs, Center for Political Studies (Copenhagen, Denmark)
• Samuel Tadros, Research Fellow, Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom
• James P. Kelly III, Director of International Affairs, The Federalist Society

Growing Repression in the West

• Bruce Bawer, Best-Selling Author of While Europe Slept
• Paul Diamond, United Kingdom defense attorney in hate speech cases
• Mark Durie, Vicar, St. Mary’s Anglican Church (Melbourne, Australia)

Where Are the Muslim Moderates?

• Manda Zand Ervin, Founder & President, Alliance of Iranian Women and Member, American Islamic Leadership Coalition
• Naser Khader, former Member, Danish Parliament
• David B. Rivkin, Jr., Partner, Baker & Hostetler LLP

Om forfølgelsen af Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Der er ikke andet ord for det:

The Political Persecution of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

by Ned May on Nov 30th, 2011

Editor’s note: The following is the first installment of a series of articles following activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s battle against her own government, as they proceed to prosecute her for disseminating the truth about Islam.

On February 15, 2011, the Austrian Counterjihad activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted of “hate speech” in a Vienna courtroom for what she said in a private seminar about Muhammad and Islam.

The original charge was “incitement to hatred”. On the second day of her trial, the judge at her own discretion added a second charge, “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion.” Elisabeth was acquitted of the first charge, but convicted of the second. She was sentenced to pay a fine of €480. Her case is currently being appealed to Austria’s highest court. If the verdict is upheld, and she refuses to pay the fine, she will spend two months in jail.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine. Og anden del:

The Political Persecution of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

by Ned May on Dec 1st, 2011

Just before Christmas, an article about Elisabeth appeared in Wienerin, a glossy Austrian magazine similar to Vanity Fair. Some translated excerpts:

She is said to have incited hate against Muslims, and is before the court on a charge of incitement. But even a conviction will not silence Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. S. M. Steinitz accompanied the new figurehead of the Islam critics to Copenhagen. And witnessed how Sabaditsch-Wolff made her trial a manifesto — and gained in political influence.

The prosecutor apparently did not consider it necessary to prepare for the trial. No, he said, he had no questions for the defendant. The tape recording of her comments, the basis for the charge against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, 39, he had only heard “in excerpts.” On this tape, covertly recorded by a reporter in the fall of 2009, can be heard how Sabaditsch-Wolff — during her seminar “The Fundamentals of Islam” — says to a participant, among other things, “Cardinals rape in spite of their religion. Muslims rape because of their religion.” Sponsor of the seminar: the Freedom Education Institute. A charge was laid after a report appeared in the weekly magazine, NEWS.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Opdatering 5. december 2011 – del 3:

The Political Persecution of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

by Ned May on Dec 2nd, 2011

Editor’s note: The following is the third installment of a series of articles following activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s battle against her own government, as they proceed to prosecute her for disseminating the truth about Islam. Click the following to read Part I and Part II.

When court reconvened in February, events moved swiftly to a close.

Judge: The integration of Muslims is surely a question of particular public interest — you are allowed to be critical — but not incitement of hatred

[judge states the permitted utterances]

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Opdatering 20. december 2011 – 4. del:

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff: Thoughts Before Trial

by Ned May on Dec 19th, 2011

Tomorrow morning, Tuesday December 20th, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff will learn the results of her appeal to Austria’s highest court.   As described in this space a few weeks ago (See Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3), Elisabeth was charged last year with “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” for asserting that “Mohammed had a thing for little girls.” In February of this year she was convicted, and will have to pay a fine of up to €480. If she refuses to pay the fine, she may spend a maximum of two months in jail.

Mere HER i FrontPageMagazine.

Jerry Gordon interviewer Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Has the OSCE Succumbed to Shariah? An Interview with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

by Jerry Gordon – November 2011

As 2011 draws to a close, a constellation of events, in the Middle East, Europe and the US have thrust certain doctrinal precepts of Islam which endanger basic Western values such as freedom of speech, into public debate. Terms like Shariah, blasphemy and Islamophobia have entered the mainstream largely at the insistence of the Saudi-based 56-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Bat Ye’or has described this organization in her recent book as the focal point of a rising world-wide Caliphate.

Witness these events. On October 28th, The Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe  (OSCE) issued new guidelines for combating Islamophobia at a conference in Vienna followed by a two day forum on November 10 and 11th to discuss implementation at the Secretariat Headquarters at the Hofburg. On November 4th, The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies held an international symposium on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC to  address the topic of Silenced: “Are Global Trends to Ban Religious Defamation, Religious Insult, and Islamophobia a New Challenge to First Amendment Freedoms?” On November 11th, the first national conference “The Constitution or Shariah: Preserving Freedom,” was held in Nashville, Tennessee  with scholars and experts from the US, U.K., Australia and Nigeria addressing the issues of Shariah and the Islamization of America.

Mere HER i The New English Review. Man kan se et andet interview fra samme konference her:

• Video: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff & Bruce Lieske

Video: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff & Bruce Lieske

Om OSCE – Security and Cooperation in Europe. Fra 11. november 2011:

ACT! for America Interviews Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE Vienna

Andre kilder: EuropeNews, Tundra Tabloids,

Jyllands-Posten må vel udfases?

Vi kan jo ikke have terrortruede bygninger stående for tid og evighed. Allerede 2009 lukkede Jyllands-Posten sit trykkeri i Viby. Hele 107 trykkere mistede deres arbejde. Jyllands-Postens bygninger i København er mere eller mindre Politikens Hus nu, – avisen forlod også sine gode lokaler på Kongens Nytorv i 2009, skriver Berlingske Tidende. Jeg gætter på, at resten af forretningen også er under afvikling. Dele af virksomheden fusionerer vel med andre foretagender. Sælges. Skifter navn. Nedlægges. Rives ned. Medarbejderne spredes for alle vinde. Og så fremdeles indtil alle aktiver er realiseret. Tilsidst går avisen ind. Jyllands-Posten har heller ikke fornyet sin hjemmesidegrafik i årevis.

Det handler om menneskeliv. Hele lokalmiljøer rundt om bladets ejendomme er i farezonen. Det man man ikke glemme.

Ikke at det hjælper. Jihadister kan sagtens finde andre danske mål. Staten importerer til stadighed flere og flere elementer af den potientielt sprængfarlige slags. Så: vi kan ikke længere have, at nogen siger, hvad vi andre tænker. Ytringsfriheden er forbi. Danmark er forbi. Vi finansierer vores egen undergang. Det er ikke kun Jyllands-Posten og ytringsfriheden, der udfases. Det er os, man vil af med. Endnu et signal til opbrud – vi må ud af Europa:

Charlie Hebdo

03.11.11

Mange vil mene, at dagens avis også burde have indeholdt den karrikaturtegning af profeten Muhammed, som efter al sandsynlighed er årsag til attentatet mod ugemagasinet Charlie Hebdos redaktion i Paris. Det gør den ikke.

Mere HER i Jyllands-Posten. Og Soeren Kern:

“100 Lashes If You Don’t Die Laughing”

Islam’s War on Free Speech

by Soeren Kern – November 3, 2011

The Paris offices of the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo were destroyed in an arson attack after it “invited” the Islamic Prophet Mohammed to be its “guest editor.”

The November 2 firebombing attack took place just hours before the magazine’s current issue — titled “Sharia Hebdo” (a reference to Islamic law), and featuring a cartoon of Mohammed on its cover — hit the news stands.

The attack marks a serious escalation of a long-running Islamic war on free speech and expression in Europe. In recent years, Muslim immigrants and their multicultural supporters in Europe have used a combination of lawsuits, verbal and physical harassment and even murder to silence debate about the rise of Islam there.

Mere HER hos Hudson New York.

Video: Ezra Levant & Nina Shea

Ezra Levant & Nina Shea on The Source – November 1, 2011

The OIC – Organization of Islamic Cooperation – is suppressing freedom of expression all over the Western world.

Sappho om Douglas Murray, svenskere, humanitærpopulister og mere

Først et portræt af Douglas Murray:

Douglas Murray – multikulturalismens vedholdende kritiker

30. oktober 2011 – artikel af Katrine Winkel Holm

Douglas Murray er en af Englands mest højprofilerede og elegante islamdebattører. Mød ham på Trykkefrihedsselskabets konference på lørdag.

Mere HER i Sappho. Sennels er rigtig god her:

Hvem skal betale regningen?

31. oktober 2011 – klumme af Nicolai Sennels

Regeringen vil øge indvandringen. Nicolai Sennels gennemgår hvad det kommer til at koste og spørger, hvem der skal betale.

Mere HER i Sappho. Straffes frafald fra islam af gammelsvenskerne? Ja da! Det er det, importen af fremmede går ud på:

Den svenske undtagelse

27. oktober 2011 – artikel af Sapphos redaktion

Er det udtryk for svensk dobbeltmoral, når man vil sende en frafalden muslim tilbage til Pakistan? Aktuel sag tyder på, at det er bedst at være muslim, hvis man vil søge asyl i Sverige.

Mere HER i Sappho.

Jesper Jespersen: EU-krisen fortsætter uændret

Det siger en af venstrefløjens mest markante økonomer:

Jesper Jespersen: EU-pakken løser ingen af de primære problemer – måske tværtimod

29.10.2011 – af Jesper Jespersen

Europas ledere vil snart blive indkaldt til et nyt topmøde. For det eneste, der står klart efter den forgangne uges EU-krisemøder er: for lidt, for uforpligtende og for sent. Eurokrisen blev ikke løst. Gælds- og bankkriserne blev ikke løst. [...]

Europa skal ikke være en stat. Nej! Mere HER i Ræson. Se eventuelt også The Daily Mail:

Silence on human rights…the price Europe must pay for China’s billions

• Campaigners fear EU will cave in to Chinese demands to tone down criticism of regime’s human rights record

Andre kilder: Ræson,

Video: Michael Rubin om styret i Iran

Foredraget skal ses i lyset af det nylige terrorforsøg i Washington imod bla. den saudiarabiske ambassadør. Rubin har før været bedre end her, men pyt. Uploadet 24. oktober 2011:

Michael Rubin: U.S. and Iran after the DC plot

Michael Rubin, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute spoke about the future of U.S. policy towards Iran at the National Security Lunch on Capitol Hill.

Video: Michael Coren spidder Tyrkiet

Fra 14. september 2011:

Michael Coren on Turkey’s neo-Ottomanism

With David Pryce-Jones of National Review.